Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is There a Metabolism of an Urban Ecosystem? An Ecological Critique

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
AMBIO Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The energy and material flows of a city are often described as urban metabolism (UM), which is put forward as a way to link a city’s ecology and economy. UM draws parallels to the biology of individual organisms, yet the analogy is misapplied. In striving to be interdisciplinary, UM makes this organismic comparison rather than identifying the city as an ecosystem, thereby ignoring developments in ecological theory. Using inappropriate rhetoric misdirects researchers, which influences scientific investigation—from problem statements to interpretations. UM is valuable in quantifying the city’s use of natural resources but does not achieve a comprehensive, integrated analysis of the urban ecosystem. To realize an interdisciplinary, perhaps transdisciplinary, understanding of urban ecology, researchers need to emphasize the essential tenets of material flows analysis, view the city as an ecosystem, and use language that properly reflects current knowledge, theory, and conceptual frameworks in the foundational disciplines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akiyama, T. 1994. Urban metabolism and sustainability. AUICK Newsletter 17. http://www.auick.org/database/apc/apc017/apc01701.html. Accessed 26 July 2005.

  • Baccini, P. 1997. A city’s metabolism: Towards the sustainable development of urban systems. Journal of Urban Technology 4: 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, L.A., D. Hope, Y. Xu, J. Edmonds, and L. Lauver. 2001. Nitrogen balance for the Central Arizona-Phoenix (CAP) ecosystem. Ecosystems 4: 582–602.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyden, S., S. Millar, K. Newcombe, and B. O’Neill. 1981. The ecology of a city and its people: The case of Hong Kong, 437. Canberra: Australian University Press.

  • Boyle, G., S. Ishii, S.K. Karn, P.J. Marcotullio, K. Suzuki, M. Abu Yusuf, and S. Zandaryaa. 2003. Defining an ecosystem approach to urban management and policy development, 22. United Nations University-Institute of Advanced Studies, Tokyo.

  • Brown, J.H. 1991. New approaches and methods in ecology. In Foundations of ecology, ed. L.A. Real, and J.H. Brown, 445–455. Chicago: The University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burney, G.M. 2004. Summary of RCP(04)606: An Overview of the literature on urban environments. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, Urban Environments Well-Being and Health, RCP(04)612, Westminster, 9.

  • Chapin, F.S., G.M. Woodwell, J.T. Randerson, E.B. Rastetter, G.M. Lovett, D.D. Baldocchi, D.A. Clark, M.E. Harmon, et al. 2006. Reconciling carbon-cycle concepts, terminology, and methods. Ecosystems 9: 1041–1050.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J.P., A. Kinzig, N.B. Grimm, W.F. Fagan, D. Hope, J. Wu, and E.T. Borer. 2000. A new urban ecology. American Scientist 88: 416–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A., N. Marchettini, and A. Facchini. 2004. Developing the urban metabolism approach into a new urban metabolic model. In The sustainable city III: Urban regeneration and assessment, ed. N. Marchettini, C.A. Brebbia, E. Tiezza, and L.C. Wadhwa, 31–40. Southamptom: WIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craige, B.J. 2001. Eugene Odum: Ecosystem ecologist and environmentalist, 226. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H.E. 1968. On economics as a life science. Journal of Political Economy 76: 392–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelis, D.L., and J.C. Waterhouse. 1987. Equilibrium and nonequilibrium concepts in ecological models. Ecological Monographs 57: 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker, E.H., S. Elliott, F.A. Smith, D.R. Blake, and F.S. Rowland. 2000. Energy and material flow through the urban ecosystem. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 25: 685–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld, J. 2003. Putting a spotlight on metaphors and analogies in industrial ecology. Journal of Industrial Ecology 7: 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Kowalski, M. 1998. Society’s metabolism: The intellectual history of materials flow analysis, part I, 1860–1970. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2: 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Kowalski, M. 2003. On the history of industrial metabolism. In Perspectives on industrial ecology, ed. D. Bourg, and S. Erkman, 35–45. Vienna: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gandy, M. 2004. Rethinking urban metabolism: Water, space and the modern city. City 8: 363–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn-Lewin, D.C., R.K. Peet, and T.T. Veblen. 1992. Plant succession: Theory and prediction, 368. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golley, F.B. 2003. Urban ecosystems and the twenty-first century—a global imperative. In Understanding urban ecosystems: A new frontier for science and education, ed. A.R. Berkowitz, C.H. Nilon, and K.S. Hollweg, 401–416. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, M.E. 1998. Transforming nature—ethics, invention, and discovery, 408. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Graedel, T.E. 1999. Industrial ecology and the ecocity. The Bridge 29: 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, N.B., J.M. Grove, S.T.A. Pickett, and C.L. Redman. 2000. Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. BioScience 50: 571–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, N.B., S.H. Faeth, N.E. Golubiewski, C.L. Redman, J.G. Wu, X.M. Bai, and J.M. Briggs. 2008. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319: 756–760.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Groffman, P.M., N.L. Law, K.T. Belt, L.E. Band, and G.T. Fisher. 2004. Nitrogen fluxes and retention in urban watershed ecosystems. Ecosystems 7: 393–403.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haberl, H. 2005. From LTER to LTSER. The socio-economic dimension of long-term socio-ecological research. IHDP Newsletter: 14.

  • Haberl, H., M. Fischer-Kowalski, F. Krausmann, H. Weisz, and V. Winiwarter. 2004. Progress towards sustainability? What the conceptual framework of material and energy flow accounting (MEFA) can offer. Land Use Policy 21: 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks, C.H., R. Obernosterer, D. Muller, S. Kytizia, P. Baccini, and P.H. Brunner. 2000. Material flow analysis: a tool to support environmental policy decision making. Case studies on the city of Vienna and the Swiss lowlands. Local Environment 5: 311–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heynen, N., M. Kaika, and E. Swyngedouw. 2006. Urban political ecology: Politicizing the production of urban natures. In In the nature of cities: Urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism, ed. N. Heynen, M. Kaika, and E. Swyngedouw, 1–20. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, R.A. 1999. Ecosystem metabolism. In Encyclopedia of environmental science, ed. D.E. Alexander, and R.W. Fairbridge, 172–175. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S.-L., and W.-L. Hsu. 2003. Materials flow analysis and emergy evaluation of Taipei’s urban construction. Landscape and Urban Planning 63: 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, J.P., P.M. Groffman, N.B. Grimm, L.A. Baker, and R.V. Pouyat. 2006. A distinct urban biogeochemistry? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21: 192–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C.A., J. Cuddihy, and J. Engel-Yan. 2007. The changing metabolism of cities. Journal of Industrial Ecology 11: 43–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsland, S.E. 1991. Foundational papers: Defining ecology as a science. In Foundations of ecology, ed. L.A. Real, and J.H. Brown, 1–13. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krausmann, F., H. Haberl, K.-H. Erb, and M. Wackernagel. 2004. Resource flows and land use in Austria 1950–2000: Using the MEFA framework to monitor society-nature interaction for sustainability. Land Use Policy 21: 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, B. 2011. The metaphoric web: Environmental metaphors and sustainability. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifset, R. 2004. Probing metabolism. Journal of Industrial Ecology 8: 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likens, G.E. 1992. The ecosystem approach: Its use and abuse, 166. Ed. O. Kinne. Oldendorf: Ecology Institute.

  • Marcogliese, D.J. 2005. Parasites of the superorganism: Are they indicators of ecosystem health? International Journal for Parasitology 35: 705–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe, K., J.D. Kalma, and A.R. Aston. 1978. The metabolism of a city: The case of Hong Kong. Ambio 7: 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P.W.G. 1999. Sustainability and cities: Extending the metabolism model. Landscape and Urban Planning 44: 219–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E.P. 1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164: 262–270.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E.P., and G.W. Barrett. 2005. Fundamentals of ecology, 598. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patten, B.C., and E.P. Odum. 1981. The cybernetic nature of ecosystems. The American Naturalist 118: 886–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S.T.A., W.R.J. Burch, S.E. Dalton, T.W. Foresman, J.M. Grove, and R.A. Rowntree. 1997. A conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas. Urban Ecosystems 1: 185–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S.T.A., M.L. Cadenasso, J.M. Grove, C.H. Nilon, R.V. Pouyat, W.C. Zipperer, and R. Costanza. 2001. Urban ecological systems: Linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32: 127–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S.T.A., M.L. Cadenasso, and J.M. Grove. 2004. Resilient cities: Meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms. Landscape and Urban Planning 69: 369–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S.T.A., M.L. Cadenasso, J.M. Grove, P.M. Groffman, L.E. Band, C.G. Boone, W.R. Burch, C.S.B. Grimmond, et al. 2008. Beyond urban legends: An emerging framework of urban ecology, as illustrated by the Baltimore Ecosystem Study. BioScience 58: 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S.T.A., J. Kolasa, and C.G. Jones. 1994. Ecological understanding, 206. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouyat, R.V., P.M. Groffman, I. Yesilonis, and L. Hernandez. 2002. Soil carbon pools and fluxes in urban ecosystems. Environmental Pollution 116: S107–S118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Redman, C.L. 1999. Human dimensions of ecosystem studies. Ecosystems 2: 296–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruth, M. 1993. Integrating economics, ecology and thermodynamics, 251. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sahely, H.R., S. Dudding, and C.A. Kennedy. 2003. Estimating the urban metabolism of Canadian cities: Greater Toronto Area case study. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 30: 468–483.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. 2006. Metabolic urbanization: The making of cyborg cities. In In the nature of cities: Urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism, ed. N. Heynen, M. Kaika, and E. Swyngedouw, 21–40. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansley, A.G. 1935. The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology 16: 284–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNU-IAS Urban Ecosystems Management Group. 2004. Cities as drivers of sustainable development. United Nations University-Institute of Advanced Studies, Barcelona, Spain, 7.

  • Warren-Rhodes, K., and A. Koenig. 2001. Escalating trends in the urban metabolism of Hong Kong: 1971–1997. Ambio 30: 429–438.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolman, A. 1965. The metabolism of cities. Scientific American 213: 179–190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to those who shared their thoughts on earlier versions of this work, including Joan Martinez Alier, John Ward, and Mitch Pavao-Zuckerman and others who attended conference presentations. I appreciate discussions on the ecological perspective with Nancy Grimm, Mary Cadenasso, and Peter Groffman. Bryan Walpert and others provided helpful comments on manuscript drafts. The thorough and insightful comments offered by several reviewers helped strengthen the argument.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy Golubiewski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Golubiewski, N. Is There a Metabolism of an Urban Ecosystem? An Ecological Critique. AMBIO 41, 751–764 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0232-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0232-7

Keywords

Navigation