Epiphytic Algae and Lichen Cover in Boreal Forests—A Long-Term Study Along a N and S Deposition Gradient in Sweden
- 175 Downloads
- 5 Citations
Abstract
The aim was to describe spatiotemporal patterns of colonization of spruce branches by algae and lichens and the relationship with decreasing deposition of N and S. Coverage was estimated annually over 10 years for four Swedish Integrated Monitoring catchments with varying deposition levels. Initial hypotheses were that algal coverage would be positively correlated with deposition and that lichen coverage would be negatively correlated with S and positively with N deposition. Data were analyzed using regression, ANOVA, and partial least square regression. The results showed a temporal decrease in the coverage of algae but an increase in colonization rates, while lichens showed less uniform patterns. Within catchments, algae and lichen coverages were positively correlated with mainly S deposition. Across catchments, coverage of algae increased, while the coverage of lichens decreased with increasing N and S deposition. Colonization rates of both algae and lichens showed weak correlations with both spatial and temporal trends in N and S deposition. Thus, while N and S deposition had an effect on the colonization and coverage of algae and lichens, other factors are also important.
Keywords
Epiphytes Algae Lichen Nitrogen Sulfur Long-term IndicatorNotes
Acknowledgments
Sven Bråkenhielm, Lage Bringmark and Staffan Åkerblom and Tommy Pettersson are thanked for inventories. The monitoring program is financed by the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Brendan McKie and anonymous reviewers gave valuable comment on the manuscript.
References
- Anon. 1998. Manual for Integrated Monitoring, compiled by im programme centre. Manual Revision group and Editorial group. http://www.environment.fi/default.asp?node=6329&lan=en. Accessed 16 Sep 2011.
- Anon. 2011. Sweden’s Environment problems and protection 1960–2010. Stockholm: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
- Atmar, W., and B.C. Patterson. 1993. The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat. Oecologia 96: 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bacic, T., P. Baas, and L.J.M. Van Der Eerden. 1992. Needle wax surface structure of Pinus sylvestris as affected by ammonia. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 41: 167–181.Google Scholar
- Bobbink, R., M. Ashmore, S. Braun, and W. Flückiger. 2003. Empirical nitrogen critical loads for natural and semi-natural ecosystems: 2002 update. Background document for expert workshop on empirical critical loads for nitrogen on (semi-) natural ecosystems. In Empirical critical loads for nitrogen, eds. B. Achermann and R. Bobbink, 43–170. Berne: Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape.Google Scholar
- Bråkenhielm, S. 1990. Vegetation monitoring in the PMK reference areas. Activity report of 1990. Stockholm: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
- Bråkenhielm, S., and L. Qinghong. 1995. Spatial and temporal variability of algal and lichen epiphytes on trees in relation to pollutant deposition in Sweden. Water, Air, and Soil pollution 79: 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carignan, V., and M.-A. Villard. 2002. Selecting indicator species to monitor ecological integrity: A review. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 78: 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cristofolini, F., P. Giordani, E. Gottardini, and P. Modenesi. 2008. The response of epiphytic lichens to air pollution and subsets of ecological predictors: A case study from the Italian Prealps. Environmental Pollution 151: 308–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dettki, H., P. Klintberg, and P. Esseen. 2000. Are epiphytic lichens in young forests limited by local dispersal. Ecoscience 7: 317–325.Google Scholar
- Ellis, C.J., and B.J. Coppins. 2010. Integrating multiple landscape-scale drivers in the lichen epiphyte response: Climatic setting, pollution regime and woodland spatial-temporal structure. Diversity and Distributions 16: 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Esseen, P.-A., and K.-E. Renhorn. 1996. Epiphytic biomass in managed old-growth boreal forests: Effect of branch quality. Ecological Applications 6: 228–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Esseen, P.-A., and K.-E. Renhorn. 1998. Edge effects on an epiphytic lichen in fragmented forests. Conservation Biology 12: 1307–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fenn, M.E., S. Jovan, F. Yuan, L. Geiser, T. Meixner, and B.S. Gimeno. 2008. Empirical and simulated critical loads for nitrogen deposition in California mixed conifer forests. Environmental Pollution 155: 492–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Geiser, L.H., S.E. Jovan, D.A. Glavich, and M.K. Porter. 2010. Lichen-based critical loads for atmospheric nitrogen deposition in Western Oregon and Washington Forests, USA. Environmental Pollution 158: 2412–2421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Göransson, A. 1990. Alger, lavar och barruppsättning hos unggranar längs en kvävegradient från Sverige till Holland: en pilotstudie. In Report, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 3741 (in Swedish). Stockholm: NaturvårdsverketGoogle Scholar
- Gries, C. 1996. Lichens as indicators of air pollution. In Lichen biology, ed. T.H. Nash III, 240–254. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Hänninen, O., J. Ruuskanen, and J. Oksanen. 1993. A method for facilitating the use of algae growing on tree trunks as bioindicators of air quality. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 28: 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hauck, M. 2010. Site factors controlling epiphytic lichen abundance in northern coniferous forests. Flora—Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants 206: 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hawksworth, D., and F. Rose. 1970. Qualitative scale for estimating sulphur dioxide air pollution in England and Wales using epiphytic lichens. Nature 227: 145–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hilmo, O. 1994. Distribution and succession of epiphytic lichens on Picea abies branches in a boreal forest, Central Norway. The Lichenologist 26: 149–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hoffmann, L. 1989. Algae of terrestrial habitats. The Botanical Review 55: 77–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hultengren, S., P.-O. Martinsson, and J. Stenström. 1991. Lavar och Luftföroreningar—Känslighetsklassning och indexberäkning av epifytiska lavar. Naturvårdsverket Rapport 3967.Google Scholar
- Hultengren, S., H. Gralén, and H. Pleijel. 2004. Recovery of the epiphytic lichen flora following air quality improvement in south-west Sweden. Water, Air, and Soil pollution 154: 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jeran, Z., T. Mrak, R. Jacimovic, F. Batic, D. Kastelec, R. Mavsar, and P. Simoncic. 2007. Epiphytic lichens as biomonitors of atmospheric pollution in Slovenian forests. Environmental Pollution 146: 324–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Johansson, O., A. Nordin, J. Olofsson, and K. Palmqvist. 2010. Responses of epiphytic lichens to an experimental whole-tree nitrogen-deposition gradient. New Phytologist 188: 1075–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krupa, S.V. 2003. Effects of atmospheric ammonia (NH3) on terrestrial vegetation: A review. Environmental Pollution 124: 179–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Larsen Vilsholm, R., P.A. Wolseley, U. Søchting, and P.J. Chimonides. 2009. Biomonitoring with lichens on twigs. The Lichenologist 41: 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liska, J., and T. Herben. 2008. Long-term changes of epiphytic lichen species composition over landscape gradients: An 18 year time series. The Lichenologist 40: 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liu, Q., and S. Bråkenhielm. 1995a. Response of epiphytic lichens and algae to sulphur and nitrogen deposition—Separation of signal from noise. In Acid regin ’95?, eds. P. Grennfelt, H. Rodhe, E. Thörnelöf, and J. Wisniewski. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Liu, Q. 1997. Variation partitioning by partial redundancy analysis (RDA). Environmetrics 8: 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liu, Q., and S. Bråkenhielm. 1995b. A statistical approach to decompose ecological variation. Water, Air, and Soil pollution 85: 1587–1592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Löfgren, S., M. Aastrup, L. Bringmark, H. Hultberg, L. Lewin-Pihlblad, L. Lundin, G. Pihl Karlsson, and B. Thunholm. 2011. Recovery of soil water, groundwater and runoff from acidification at the Swedish Integrated Monitoring sites. Ambio. doi: 10.1007/s13280-011-0207-8.
- Marti, J. 1983. Sensitivity of lichen phycobionts to dissolved air pollutants. Canadian Journal of Botany 61: 1642–1653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nilsson, J., and P. Grennfelt (eds.). 1998. Critical loads for sulphur and nitrogen. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.Google Scholar
- Økland, R.H. 1990. Vegetation ecology: theory, methods and applications with reference to Fennoscandia. Sommerfeltia Supplements 1: 1–233.Google Scholar
- Peveling, E., H. Burg, and K.B. Tenberge. 1992. Epiphytic algae and fungi on spruce needles. Symbiosis 12: 173–187.Google Scholar
- Poggio, L. 2002. Epiphytic algae on Norway spruce needles in Sweden: Geographical distribution, time-trends and influence of site factors. Uppsala: Sveriges lantbruksuniveristet.Google Scholar
- Poikolainen, J., M. Kuusinen, K. Mikkola, and M. Lindgren. 1998a. Mapping of the epiphytic lichens on conifers in Finland in the years 1985–1986 and 1995. Chemosphere 36: 1073–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Poikolainen, J., H. Lippo, M. Hongisto, E. Kubin, K. Mikkola, and M. Lindgren. 1998b. On the abundance of epiphytic green algae in relation to the nitrogen concentrations of biomonitors and nitrogen deposition in Finland. Environmental Pollution 102(Suppl. 1): 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Skye, E. 1979. Lichens as biological indicators of air pollution. Annual Review of Phytopathology 17: 325–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Søchting, U. 1997. Epiphyllic cover on spruce needles in Denmark. Annales Botanici Fennici 34: 157–164.Google Scholar
- Sparrius, L.B. 2007. Response of epiphytic lichen communities to decreasing ammonia air concentrations in a moderately polluted area of The Netherlands. Environmental Pollution 146: 375–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thomsen, M.G. 1992. Epifyttisk belegg på barnåler i Norge i relasjon til nitrogendeposisjon og klima. Rapport Skogforsk 23, 1–11 (in Norwegian with English summary).Google Scholar
- Umetrics, 2009. Simca-P+ 12. User guide and tutorial. Umeå, Sweden.Google Scholar
- van Dobben, H.F., and C.J.F. ter Braak. 1998. Effects of atmospheric NH3 on epiphytic lichens in the Netherlands: the pitfalls of biological monitoring. Atmospheric Environment 32: 551–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- van Dobben, H.F., and C.J.F. ter Braak. 1999. Ranking of epiphytic lichen sensitivity to air pollution using survey data: a comparison of indicator scales. The Lichenologist 31: 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- van Herk, C.M. 1999. Mapping of ammonia pollution with epiphytic lichens in the Netherlands. The Lichenologist 31: 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- van Herk, K. 2004. A changing lichen flora. In Lichens in a changing pollution environment. English Nature Research Reports eds. Lambley, P., Wolseley, P., English Nature, pp. 13-20.Google Scholar
- van Herk, C.M., E.A.M. Mathijssen-Spiekman, and D. de Zwart. 2003. Long distance nitrogen air pollution effects on lichens in Europe. The Lichenologist 35: 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wolseley, P.A., and K.V. Pryor. 1999. The potential of epiphytic twig communities on Quercus petraea in a Welsh woodland site (Tycanol) for evaluating environmental changes. The Lichenologist 31: 41–61.Google Scholar