Governance of Water Resources in the Phase of Change: A Case Study of the Implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive in Sweden
- 542 Downloads
In this article, focusing on the ongoing implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive, we analyze some of the opportunities and challenges for a sustainable governance of water resources from an ecosystem management perspective. In the face of uncertainty and change, the ecosystem approach as a holistic and integrated management framework is increasingly recognized. The ongoing implementation of the Water Framework Directive (WFD) could be viewed as a reorganization phase in the process of change in institutional arrangements and ecosystems. In this case study from the Northern Baltic Sea River Basin District, Sweden, we focus in particular on data and information management from a multi-level governance perspective from the local stakeholder to the River Basin level. We apply a document analysis, hydrological mapping, and GIS models to analyze some of the institutional framework created for the implementation of the WFD. The study underlines the importance of institutional arrangements that can handle variability of local situations and trade-offs between solutions and priorities on different hierarchical levels.
KeywordsEcosystem management GIS Hydrological mapping Information management Stakeholder participation
This study was funded by the Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies and the EU BONUS-program. We thank Ingela Andersson, Frida Franzén, Tore Söderqvist, and Dan Warghagen for interesting discussions and comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments on the manuscript.
- Bergström, S., S. Hellström, and J. Andréasson. 2006. Water levels and discharges in the water systems of Lake Vänern and Lake Mälaren—Hydrologic white paper to the Commission on Climate and Vulnerability in Sweden. SMHI Reports Hydrology, RH No. 20. (in Swedish).Google Scholar
- Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke. (eds.). 2003. Navigating Social-Ecological Systems Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge University Press. 393 pp.Google Scholar
- Böhme, K. 2002. Nordic Echoes of European Spatial Planning. Nordregio, Report 2002:8, Stockholm.Google Scholar
- Chalmers, N., and C. Fabricius. 2007. Expert and generalist local knowledge about land-cover change on South Africa’s wild coast: Can local ecological knowledge add value to science? Ecology and Society. 12:10. http//:www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art10/.
- Convention on Biodiversity (CBD). 1998. Report of the workshop on the Ecosystem Approach. Lilongwe, Malawi. 26–28 January, 1998. UNEP/COP/4/Inf.9.Google Scholar
- Daily, G. (ed.). 1997. Natures’ services. Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
- Dale, V.H., S. Brown, R.A. Haeuber, N.T. Hobbs, N. Huntley, R.J. Naiman, W.E. Ribesame, M.G. Turner, et al. 2000. Ecological principles and guidelines for managing the use of land. Ecological Applications 10: 639–670.Google Scholar
- ESRI. 2008. ArcGIS (Version 9.3) GIS Application. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
- European Parliament, Council. 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC (Water Framework Directive). Google Scholar
- European Commission. 2003. Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (200/60/EC), Guidance document no. 8, Public Participation in relation to the Water Framework Directive. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
- Falkenmark, M., and C. Folke. 2000. How to bring ecological services into integrated water resources management. AMBIO 29: 351–352.Google Scholar
- Folke, C., F. Berkes, J. Colding, and U. Svedin. 1998. The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions. IHDP Working Paper No. 2. International Human Dimensions Program on Global Environmental Change, Bonn, Germany. Available online at:http://www.ihdp.uni-bonn.de/html/publications/workingpaper/wp02m.htm.
- Gadgil, M., P. Olsson, F. Berkes, and C. Folke. 2003. Exploring the role of local ecological knowledge in ecosystem management: Three casestudies. In Navigating social–ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change, ed. F. Berkes, J. Colding, and C. Folke, 189–209. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Gunderson, L., and C.S. Holling, (eds.) 2002. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. I Washington D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
- Hedin, S., A. Dubois, R. Ikonen, P. Lindblom, S. Nilsson, V.-P. Tynkkynen, M. Viehhauser, Ü. Leisk et al. 2007. The Water Framework Directive in the Baltic Sea Region Countries—vertical implementation, horizontal integration and transnational cooperation. Nordregio. 2007: 2 Stockholm. 176 pp.Google Scholar
- HELCOM (Helsinki commission). 2008. Convention on the protection of the marine environment of the Baltic Sea area. Including the amendments to its Annexes adopted by the Helsinki Commission in 2000, 2001, 2003 and 2007. Helsinki Commission, Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission. www.helcom.fi.
- Jöborn, A., I. Danielsson, B. Arheimer, A. Jonsson, M.H. Larsson, L.J. Lundqvist, M. Löwgren, and K. Tonderski. 2005. Integrated water management for eutrophication control: Public participation, pricing policy, and catchment modeling. AMBIO 34: 482–488.Google Scholar
- Kern, K., and T. Löffelsend. 2004. Governance beyond the nation-state: Transnationalization and Europeization of the Baltic Sea region. Discussion Paper SP IV 2004-105. Social Science Research Center. Berlin.Google Scholar
- Lantmäteriet. 2010a. GSD terrain elevation databank. Lantmäteriet, Gävle (retrieved May 10, 2010, grant I 2010/0044, https://butiken.metria.se/digibib/index.php).
- Lantmäteriet. 2010b. GSD topographic map. Lantmäteriet, Gävle (retrieved May 10, 2010, grant I 2010/0044, https://butiken.metria.se/digibib/index.php).
- Lantmäteriet. 2010c. GSD property Map. Lantmäteriet, Gävle (retrieved May 10, 2010, grant I 2010/0044, https://butiken.metria.se/digibib/index.php).
- Länsstyrelsen Västmanlands län, Vattenmyndigheten Norra Östersjön. 2009a. Programme of Measures. The Northern Baltic Sea River Basin District 2009–2015 (in Swedish).Google Scholar
- Länsstyrelsen Västmanlands län, Vattenmyndigheten Norra Östersjön. 2009b. Management Plan. The Northern Baltic Sea River Basin District 2009–2015 (in Swedish).Google Scholar
- Länsstyrelsen Västmanlands län, Vattenmyndigheten Norra Östersjön. 2009c. Environmental quality standards. The Northern Baltic Sea River Basin District 2009 (in Swedish).Google Scholar
- Meinzen-Dick, R. 2007. Beyond panaceas in water institutions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 15200–15205.Google Scholar
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (MA). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington D.C., USA.Google Scholar
- Neuendorf, K.A. 2002. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Nilsson, S. 2006. Managing water according to river basins. Information management, institutional arrangements and strategic policy support—with focus on the EU Water Framework Directive. TRITA-LWR. PhD Thesis 1030.Google Scholar
- Ostrom, E. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Quinn, P., K. Beven, and R. Lamb. 1995. The ln(a/tanß) index: How to calculate it and how to use it within the TOPMODEL framework. Hydrological Processes 9: 161–182.Google Scholar
- Reid, W., F. Berkes, T.J. Wilbanks, and D. Capistrano. 2006. Bridging scales and knowledge systems. Concepts and applications in ecosystem assessment. Island Press. Covelo. 351 pp.Google Scholar
- SMHI. 2010. GSD river basin data, Swedish water archive. SVAR 2008. (retrieved Mar 18, 2010, © Lantmäteriet Gävle 2010. Permission I 2010/0056, http://produkter.smhi.se/svar/svar2008.htm).
- Tarboton, D.G., K.A.T. Schreuders, D.W. Watson, and M.E. Baker. 2009. Generalized terrain-based flow analysis of digital elevation models. 18th World IMACS Congress and MODSIM09 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, ed. R. S. Anderssen, R. D. Braddock, and L.T.H. Newham. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand and International Association for Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, July 2009: 2000–2006.Google Scholar
- Young, O. 2002. The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar