Advertisement

AMBIO

, Volume 39, Issue 8, pp 567–579 | Cite as

The Expansion of Farm-Based Plantation Forestry in Vietnam

  • Mats Sandewall
  • Bo Ohlsson
  • R. Kajsa Sandewall
  • Le Sy Viet
Report

Abstract

This study targets plantation forestry by farm households (small holders), which is increasing globally and most rapidly in China and Vietnam. By use of an interdisciplinary approach on three study sites in Vietnam, we examined the trends in farmers’ tree planting over time, the various pre-requisites for farm-based plantation forestry and its impact on rural people’s livelihood strategies, socio-economic status, income and security. The findings indicated a change from subsistence to cash-based household economy, diversification of farmers’ incomes and a transformation of the landscape from mainly natural forests, via deforestation and shifting cultivation, to a landscape dominated by farm-based plantations. The trend of transformation, over a period of some 30 years, towards cash crops and forestry was induced by a combination of policy, market, institutional, infrastructural and other conditions and the existence of professional farming communities, and was most rapid close to the industrial market.

Keywords

Smallholder households Livelihood strategies Landscape Land use Policy Market 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the input by Formas, Sida and SLU in funding the study. We also appreciate Dr Phung van Khoa, Vietnam Forestry University and Dr Bruce Campbell, CIFOR, for their important comments and backstopping, Dr Jeremy Flower-Ellis for professional editorial assistance and the officials and farmers of the districts of Doan Hung, Ham Yen and Muong Khuong for their indispensible contribution and hospitality.

References

  1. Angelsen, A., and S. Wunder. 2003. Exploring the forest-poverty link: Key concepts, issues and research implications. CIFOR Occasional Paper No 40.Google Scholar
  2. Anon. 2005. State forest enterprise reform in Vietnam. Review of policy and implementation framework for decree 200. EASRD (World Bank), Technical Note.Google Scholar
  3. Arnold, M., and P. Dewee. 1998. Rethinking approaches to tree management by farmers, Natural Resources Perspectives, No. 26. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
  4. Barney, K. 2005. China and forest trade in the Asia Pacific Region: Implications for forests and livelihoods. Central plans and global exports: Tracking Vietnam’s forestry commodity chains and export links to China. Washington: Forest Trends.Google Scholar
  5. Byron, R.N. 2001. Keys to smallholder forestry in developing countries in the tropics. In Sustainable farm forestry in the tropics. socio-economic analysis and policy, ed. Harrison, S.R., and J.L Herbohn. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  6. CARE International, Vietnam. 1994. Review of farmer perspectives and assessment of smallholder forestry systems in relation to World Food Programme Project 4304 Reforestation in Coastal Vietnam. c/o UNDP, Ha Noi.Google Scholar
  7. Carle, J., and P. Holmgren. 2009. Wood from planted forests—A global outlook 2005–2030. Forest Products Journal 58(12): 6–18.Google Scholar
  8. Castella, J.-C., S. Boissau, N. Hai Thanh, and P. Novosad. 2006. Impact of forest land allocation on land use in a mountainous province of Vietnam. Land Use Policy, 23(2):147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Donovan, D., T. Rambo, J. Fox, L.T. Cuc, and T.D. Vien. 1997. Development trends in Vietnam’s Northern Mountain Region, an overview and analysis, vol. 1. Hanoi: National Publishing House.Google Scholar
  10. FAO. 2005. Global forest resources assessment 2005. FAO Forestry Paper 147, Rome.Google Scholar
  11. FAO. 2006. Global planted forests thematic study: Results and analysis. Planted forests and Trees Working Paper FP38E. Rome.Google Scholar
  12. Fisher, R.J., S. Maginnis, W.J. Jackson, E. Barrow, and S. Jeanrenaud. 2005. Poverty and conservation. Landscapes, people and power. Gland and Cambridge: IUCN.Google Scholar
  13. Gomiero, T., D. Pettenella, G.P. Trieu, and G.P. Paoletti. 2000. Vietnamese uplands: Environmental and socio-economic perspective of forest land allocation and deforestation process. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2(2): 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harrison, S.R., J.L. Herbohn, C.A. Tisdell, and D. Lamb. 2000. Timber production and biodiversity tradeoffs in plantation forestry. In: Sustainable Small-scale Forestry. Socio-economic Analysis and Policy, ed. Harrison J.L. et al. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  15. Jong de, W., D.D. Sam, and T.V. Hung. 2006. Forest rehabilitation in Vietnam. Histories, realities and future. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.Google Scholar
  16. Koninck, R. 1999. Deforestation in Vietnam. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Center.Google Scholar
  17. MARD. 2006. National forest development strategy 2006–2020. Hanoi: MARD.Google Scholar
  18. McElwee, P. 2008. Forest environmental income in Vietnam: Household socioeconomic factors influencing forest use. Environmental Conservation 35(2): 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McElwee, P. 2009. Reforesting “Bare Hills” in Vietnam: Social and environmental consequences of the 5 Million Hectare Reforestation Program. AMBIO 38: 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meyfroidt, P., and E.F. Lambin. 2009. Forest transition in Vietnam and displacement of deforestation abroad. PNAS Early Edition approved 27 July 2009 (www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0904942106).
  21. Ohlsson, B., M. Sandewall, K. Sandewall, and N.H. Phon. 2005. Government plans and farmers intentions—a study on forest land use planning in Vietnam. AMBIO 34: 248–255.Google Scholar
  22. Phuc, T.X. 2003. Widening the gap between the rich and the poor. Impacts of forest land allocation in a Dao community in Northern Vietnam. Conference Paper, Chieng Mai.Google Scholar
  23. Sam, D.D., and L.Q. Trung. 2001. Forest policy trends in Vietnam. In: Policy Trend Report 2001, 69–73.Google Scholar
  24. Sandewall, K., T.T. Binh, and A. Tollefsen. 2004. Changes in land use and people’s livelihoods in Vietnam’s northern mountain region. Paper presented at the international symposium “The changing Mekong: Pluralistic societies under siege”, Khon Kaen University, Thailand, July 2004.Google Scholar
  25. SIDA. 1987. Forestry work and rural development associated with the Bai Bang project.Google Scholar
  26. Sikor, T. 2001. The allocation of forest land in Vietnam—Did it cause expansion of forests in the North-West? Forest Policy and Economics 2: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sikor, T., and U. Apel. 1998. The possibilities for community forestry in Vietnam. Asia Forestry Network, Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
  28. Sikor, T., and D.M. Truong. 2002. Acricultural policy and land use changes in a Black Thai Commune of Northern Vietnam, 1952–1997. Mountain Research and Development 22(3): 248–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sjaastad, E., A. Angelsen, P. Vedeld, and J. Bojö. 2005. What is environmental income? Ecological Economics 55: 37–46.Google Scholar
  30. Sunderlin, W.D., and H. Thu Ba. 2005. Poverty alleviation and forests in Vietnam. Bogor: CIFOR.Google Scholar
  31. The Socialist Republic of Vietnam. 2004. The Comprehensive Poverty Reduction and Growth Strategy (CPRGS), Ha Noi, November. Approved by PM May 2002 and November 2003.Google Scholar
  32. Varis, O. 2008. Poverty, economic growth, deprivation and Water: The cases of Cambodia and Vietnam. AMBIO 37: 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vedeld, P., A. Angelsen, E. Sjaastad, and G.K. Berg. 2004. Counting on the environment. Forest incomes and the rural poor. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mats Sandewall
    • 1
  • Bo Ohlsson
    • 2
  • R. Kajsa Sandewall
    • 3
  • Le Sy Viet
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Forest Resource ManagementSLUUmeåSweden
  2. 2.SLUVästeråsSweden
  3. 3.SLUUmeåSweden
  4. 4.Vietnam Forestry UniversityHanoiVietnam

Personalised recommendations