Advertisement

AMBIO

, Volume 39, Issue 7, pp 515–523 | Cite as

Charging for Nature: Marine Park Fees and Management from a User Perspective

  • Maria C. Uyarra
  • Jennifer A. Gill
  • Isabelle M. Côté
Report

Abstract

User fees can contribute to the financial sustainability of marine protected areas (MPAs), yet they must be acceptable to users. We explore changes in the fee system and management of Bonaire National Marine Park (BNMP) from the perspective of users. Responses from 393 tourists indicated that 90% were satisfied with park conditions and considered current user fees reasonable. However, only 47% of divers and 40% of non-divers were prepared to pay more. Diver willingness-to-pay (WTP) appears to have decreased since 1991, but this difference could be due in part to methodological differences between studies. Although current fees are close to diver maximum stated WTP, revenues could potentially be increased by improving the current fee system in ways that users deem acceptable. This potential surplus highlights the value of understanding user perceptions toward MPA fees and management.

Keywords

Contingent valuation Willingness-to-pay Tourism Marine protected areas Bonaire Caribbean 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the BNMP and especially Elsmarie Beukenboom, Ramón de León and Kerenza Rannou for providing data, logistical, and intellectual support; Leslie Laplace (Bonaire Flamingo Airport) for permission to conduct questionnaire surveys at the airport; Andrew Watkinson for guidance with study design; Brett Day and Jokin del Amo for help with methods; Ben Holt, Fernando Simal, Pauline Keynes, and Siomara Albertus for support in the field; Tim Daw and Julie Hawkins for comments on the manuscript, and all the tourists for completing our survey during their holiday time. M.C. Uyarra was funded by Fundación Caja Madrid and the Sir Philip Reckitt Trust.

References

  1. Arin, T., and R.A. Kramer. 2002. Divers’ willingness to pay to visit marine sanctuaries: An exploratory study. Ocean and Coastal Management 45: 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asafu-Adjaye, J., and S. Tapsuwan. 2008. A contingent valuation study of scuba diving benefits: Case study in Mu Ko Similan Marine National Park, Thailand. Tourism Management 29: 1122–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bak, R.P.M., and G. Nieuwland. 1995. Long-term change in coral communities along depth gradients over leeward reefs in the Netherlands-Antilles. Bulletin of Marine Science 56: 609–619.Google Scholar
  4. Bak, R.P., G. Nieuwland, and E.H. Meesters. 2005. Coral reef crisis in deep and shallow reefs: 30 years of constancy and change in reefs of Curaçao and Bonaire. Coral Reefs 24: 475–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barker, N.H.L., and C.M. Roberts. 2008. Attitudes and preferences of divers towards regulations. In New frontiers in marine tourism: Diving experiences, sustainability, management, ed. B. Garrod, and S. Gössling, 171–188. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  6. Bateman, I.J., I.H. Langford, R.K. Turner, K.G. Willis, and G.D. Garrod. 1995. Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies. Ecological Economics 12: 161–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. BNMP. 2009. Bonaire National Marine Park. http://www.bmp.org/index.html.
  8. Burke, L., and J. Maidens. 2004. Reefs at risk in the Caribbean. Washington: World Resource Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Cesar, H., L. Burke, and L. Pet-Soede. 2003. The economics of worldwide coral reef degradation. Arnhem: Cesar Environmental Economics Consulting (CEEC).Google Scholar
  10. Costanza, R., R. Darge, R. Degroot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, et al. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dearden, P., M. Bennett, and R. Rollins. 2007. Perceptions of diving impacts and implications for reef conservation. Coastal Management 35: 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Depondt, F., and E. Green. 2006. Diving user fees and the financial sustainability of marine protected areas: Opportunities and impediments. Ocean and Coastal Management 49: 188–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dharmaratne, G.S., F.Y. Sang, and L.J. Walling. 2000. Tourism potentials for financing protected areas. Annals of Tourism Research 27: 590–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dixon, J.A., L.F. Scura, and T. Vanthof. 1993. Meeting ecological and economic goals—marine parks in the Caribbean. Ambio 22: 117–125.Google Scholar
  15. Edwards, P.E.T. 2009. Sustainable financing for ocean and coastal management in Jamaica: The potential for revenues from tourist user fees. Marine Policy 33: 376–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fernandes, L. 1995. Integrating economic, environmental, and social issues in an evaluation of Saba Marine Park, N.A., Caribbean Sea. Honolulu: Honblue.Google Scholar
  17. Garrod, B., and S. Gössling. 2008. New frontiers in diving tourism: Diving experiences, sustainability, management, 3–31. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  18. Geoghegan, T. 1998. Financing protected ares management: Experiences from the Caribbean. http://www.canari.org/finance.pdf.
  19. Green, E., and R. Donnelly. 2003. Recreational scuba diving in Caribbean marine protected areas: Do the users pay? Ambio 32: 140–144.Google Scholar
  20. Hanemann, W.M. 1994. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. Journal of Economic Perspective 8: 19–43.Google Scholar
  21. Hasler, H., and J.A. Ott. 2008. Diving down the reefs? Intensive diving tourism threatens the reefs of the northern Red Sea. Marine Pollution Bulletin 56: 1788–1794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hawkins, J.P., C.M. Roberts, T. Van’t Hof, K. De Meyer, J. Tratalos, and C. Aldam. 1999. Effects of recreational scuba diving on Caribbean coral and fish communities. Conservation Biology 13: 888–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jobbins, G. 2006. Tourism and coral-reefs-based conservation: Can they coexist? In Coral reef conservation, ed. I.M. Côté, and J.D. Reynolds, 237–263. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Madhoo, Y.N. 2007. Estimating the budgetary impact of higher willingness to pay for residential water using CVM: A case study of Mauritius. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution 4: 57–64.Google Scholar
  25. McCartney, A. 2006. The social value of seascapes in the Jurien Bay Marine Park: An assessment of positive and negative preferences for change. Journal of Agricultural Economics 57: 577–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McManus, J.W. 1994. The Spratly Islands—a marine park. Ambio 23: 181–186.Google Scholar
  27. Mmopelwa, G., D.L. Kgathi, and L. Molefhe. 2007. Tourists’ perceptions and their willingness to pay for park fees: A case study of self-drive tourists and clients for mobile tour operators in Moremi Game Reserve, Botswana. Tourism Management 28: 1044–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mora, C. 2008. A clear human footprint in the coral reefs of the Caribbean. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275: 767–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oliveira, P., and P.T. Pereira. 2008. Who values what in a tourism destination? The case of Madeira Island. Tourism Economics 14: 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parsons, G.R., and S.M. Thur. 2008. Valuing changes in the quality of coral reef ecosystems: A stated preference study of SCUBA diving in the Bonaire National Marine Park. Environmental & Resource Economics 40: 593–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pendleton, L.H. 1995. Valuing coral-reef protection. Ocean and Coastal Management 26: 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peters, H., and J.P. Hawkins. 2009. Access to marine parks: A comparative study in willingness to pay. Ocean and Coastal Management 52: 219–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reid-Grant, K., and M.G. Bhat. 2009. Financing marine protected areas in Jamaica: An exploratory study. Marine Policy 33: 128–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Spurgeon, J. 2004. Valuation of coral reefs: The next 10 years. In Economic valuation and policy priorities for sustainable management of coral reefs, ed. M. Ahmed, K.C. Ciew, and H. Cesar, 50–58. Penang: The WorldFish Center.Google Scholar
  35. STINAPA. 2009. Financial report 2008. Kralendijk: Stichting Nationale Parken Nederlandse Antillean.Google Scholar
  36. Svensson, P., L.D. Rodwell, and M.J. Attrill. 2008. Hotel-managed marine reserves: A willingness to pay survey. Ocean and Coastal Management 51: 854–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. TCB. 2009. Bonaire tourism annual statistics report 2008. Kralendijk: Tourism Corporation Bonaire.Google Scholar
  38. Thur, S.M. 2010. User fees as sustainable financing mechanisms for marine protected areas: An application to the Bonaire National Marine. Ambio 34: 63–69.Google Scholar
  39. Togridou, A., T. Hovardas, and J.D. Pantis. 2006. Determinants of visitors’ willingness to pay for the National Marine Park of Zakynthos, Greece. Ecological Economics 60: 308–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Townsend, C. 2008. Interpretation and environmental education as conservation tools. In New frontiers in marine tourism: Diving experiences, sustainability, management, ed. B. Garrod, and S. Gössling, 189–200. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  41. UNWTO. 2008. Tourism highlights 2008 edition. The World Tourism Organisation. http://www.unwto.org/facts/eng/pdf/highlights/UNWTO_Highlights08_en_LR.pdf.
  42. Uyarra, M.C. 2002. Evaluation of the potential economic impacts of climate change on the tourism industry on two Caribbean islands: Bonaire and Barbados. MSc thesis, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.Google Scholar
  43. Uyarra, M.C. 2009. Managing tourism for coral reef conservation. PhD thesis, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.Google Scholar
  44. Uyarra, M., A. Watkinson, and I.M. Côté. 2009. Managing dive tourism for the sustainable use of coral reefs: Validating diver perceptions of attractive site features. Environmental Management 43: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Van’t Hof, T. 1997. New guide to the Bonaire Marine Park. Kralendijk: Harbour Village Beach Resort.Google Scholar
  46. Venkatachalam, L. 2004. The contingent valuation method: A review. Environmental Impact Assessment 24: 89–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Walsh, R.G., J.B. Loomis, and R.A. Gillman. 1984. Valuing option, existence and bequest demands for wilderness. Land Economics 60: 14–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. White, P.C.L., A.C. Bennett, and E.J.V. Hayes. 2001. The use of willingness-to-pay approaches in mammal conservation. Mammal Review 31: 151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Williamson, S.H. 2009. Six ways to compute the relative value of a U.S. dollar amount, 1774 to present. http://www.measuringworth.com/uscompare/.
  50. Yeo, B.H. 2004. The recreational benefits of coral reefs: A case study of Palau Payar Marine Park, Kedah, Malaysia. In Economic valuation and policy priorities for sustainable management of coral reefs, ed. M. Ahmed, C.K. Chong, and H. Cesar, 108–117. Penang: The WorldFish Center.Google Scholar
  51. Zakai, D., and N.E. Chadwick-Furman. 2002. Impacts of intensive recreational diving on reef corals at Eilat, northern Red Sea. Biological Conservation 105: 179–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria C. Uyarra
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jennifer A. Gill
    • 1
  • Isabelle M. Côté
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations