, Volume 39, Issue 7, pp 496–503 | Cite as

Recent Changes in Body Size of the Eurasian Otter Lutra lutra in Sweden

  • Yoram Yom-Tov
  • Anna Roos
  • Peter Mortensen
  • Øystein Wiig
  • Shlomith Yom-Tov
  • Thrine M. Heggberget


We studied geographical and temporal body size trends among 169 adult museum specimens of the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) collected in Sweden between 1962 and 2008, whose sex, year of collection, and locality were known. Skull size and body mass increased significantly in relation to the year of collection, and skull size (but not body mass) was significantly and negatively related to latitude, contrasting Bergmann’s rule and the trend found for Norwegian otters. Latitudinal differences in body size between the two countries may be due to differences in food availability. The temporal increase in body size among Swedish otters resembled that observed for Norway otters, though Swedish otters are smaller with respect to their Norwegian counterparts. Latitude and year represent a combination of environmental factors, including ambient temperature in the year of collection as well as the number of days of ice coverage. We replaced the above factors with mean annual temperature or the number of days of ice coverage, and found that each of these factors explains a similar proportion of the variation in body size as did latitude and year. We hypothesize that this temporal increase in body size is related to a combination of factors, including reduced energy expenditure resulting from increasing ambient temperature, and increased food availability from longer ice-free periods.


Eurasian otter Lutra lutra Sweden Body size Ambient temperature Ice coverage Food availability Global warming 



Thanks are due to Olavi Grönwall for his warm hospitality to YYT and SYT during their visit to the NRM and to Per Ericson for his valuable support. We are grateful to Eli Geffen for advice and comments, to Naomi Paz for editing this article, and to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions. YYT and SYT would like to thank Nick Davies for his hospitality during their sabbatical in Cambridge, England. We are grateful to Else-Marie Wingqvist of the Swedish Meteorological Service and to Mark Lomas of Sheffield University for their help in obtaining climate data. We acknowledge the financial support of a SYNTHESYS grant to YYT (SE-TAF-1844) made available by the European Community Research Infrastructure Action under the FP6 Structuring the European Research Area Programme, and the Israel Cohen Chair of Environmental Zoology to YYT.


  1. Arrendal, J., C.W. Walker, A.K. Sundqvist, L. Hellborg, and C. Vilà. 2004. Genetic evaluation of an otter translocation program. Conservation Genetics 5: 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ask, L., and H. Westerberg (eds.). 2008. Fiskbestånd och miljö i hav och sötvatten - Ressurs- och miljööversikt 2008, 180 pp. Fiskeriverket (The Swedish Board of Fisheries) (in Swedish).
  3. Bechshøft, T.Ø., C. Sonne, F.F. Rigét, Ø. Wiig, and R. Dietz. 2008. Differences in growth, size and sexual dimorphism in skulls of East Greenland and Svalbard polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Polar Biology 31: 945–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bister, M., and A. Roos. 2006. Uttern I Sverige 2006. V ärldsnaturfondet WWF, 40 pp (in Swedish).Google Scholar
  5. Creighton, G.K. 1980. Static allometry of mammalian teeth and the correlation of tooth size and body size in contemporary mammals. Journal of Zoology 191: 435–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Erlinge, S. 1968. On the ecological significance of Bergmann’s rule L. Oikos 19: 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gosler, A.G., J.J.D. Greenwood, and C.M. Perrin. 1995. Predation risk and the cost of being fat. Nature 377: 621–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gustafson, L., and I. Ahlen (eds.). 1996. National atlas of Sweden, Vol. 16. Geography of plants and animals. Stockholm: Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Heggberget, T.M. 1993. Marine-feeding otters (Lutra lutra) in Norway: Seasonal variation in prey and reproductive timing. Journal of Marine Biology Association of the United Kingdom 73: 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heggberget, T.M., M.I. Solem, and F. Holmstrøm. 2007. Fallvilt og avlivede dyr av oter - Årsrapport for 2006. [Collected dead otters—annual report 2006]. In Norwegian with English abstract. NINA Rapport. 243.Google Scholar
  11. Holmquist, C., and O. Funcke. 2006. Vattenbruk i Sverige 2005. Aquaculture in Sweden in 2005. Sveriges officiella statistik, statistiska meddelanden. In Swedish with parts in English. JO 60 SM 0601, 17 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Johnsen, S. 1928. Rovdyr og rovfuglstatistikken i Norge [Statistics for carnivores and birds of prey in Norway]. In Norwegian - Bergen Mus. Årbok 1929, Nat. vid. Rekke 2:1–118 + Tables.Google Scholar
  13. Johnston, D.R. 1991. Measurement of weasel body size. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69: 2277–2279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kjønhaug, A.F. 2006a. Produksjon av laks og regnbueørret 2005 [Production of salmon and rainbow trout 2006]. In T. Svåsand, K. Boxaspen, E. Dahl, and L.L. Jørgensen, ed. Norwegian with English summary. In Kyst og havbruk 2006. Fisken og havet, særnr. 2-2006.Google Scholar
  15. Kjønhaug, A.F. 2006b. Produksjon av torsk 2005 [Production of cod 2005]. In Norwegian with English summary. In T. Svåsand, K. Boxaspen, E. Dahl, and L.L. Jørgensen, ed. Kyst og havbruk 2006.Google Scholar
  16. Kruuk, H. 1995. Wild otters: predation and populations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Laidre, K.L., J.A. Estes, M.T. Tinker, J. Bodkin, D. Monson, and D. Schneider. 2006. Patterns of growth and body condition in sea otters from the Aleutian archipelago before and after the recent population decline. Journal of Animal Ecology 75: 978–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McNab, B.K. 1971. On the ecological significance of Bergmann’s rule. Ecology 52: 845–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meiri, S., Y. Yom-Tov, and E. Geffen. 2007. What determines conformity to Bergmann’s rule? Global Ecology and Biogeography 16: 788–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Millien, V., S.K. Lyons, L. Olson, F.S. Smith, T. Wilson, and Y. Yom-Tov. 2006. Ecotypic variation in the context of global climate change: revisiting the rules. Ecology Letters 9: 853–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pertoldi, C., A.B. Madsen, E. Randi, A. Braun, and V. Loeskschcke. 1998. Variation of skull morphometry of Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra) in Denmark and Germany. Annales Zoologici Fennici 35: 87–94.Google Scholar
  22. Raab, B. 1995. Water temperature and ice. In National Atlas of Sweden, Vol. 14. Climate, lakes and rivers, ed. B. Raab, and H. Vedin, 136–141. Stockholm: Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute.Google Scholar
  23. Räisänen, A., U. Hansson, A. Ullerstig, R. Döscher, L.P. Graham, C. Jones, H.E.M. Meier, P. Samuelsson, and U. Willén. 2003. European climate in the late twenty-first century: regional simulations with two driving global models and two forcing scenarios. Climate Dynamics 22: 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rask, M., M. Appelberg, T. Hesthagen, J. Tammi, U. Beier, and A. Lappalainen. 2000. Fish survey of Nordic lakesspecies composition, distribution, effects of environmental changes. Tema nord 2000, 508, 58 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Roos, A., E. Greyerz, M. Olsson, and F. Sandgren. 2001. The otter (Lutra lutra) in Sweden—population trends in relation to ∑DDT and total PCB concentrations during 1968–99. Environmental Pollution 111: 457–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sagiv, S.K., P.E. Tolbert, L.M. Altshul, and S.A. Korrick. 2007. Organochlorine exposures during pregnancy and infant size at birth. Epidemiology 18: 120–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Scholander, P.F. 1956. Climatic rules. Evolution 10: 339–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sjöåsen, T. 1997. Movements and establishment of reintroduced European otters Lutra lutra. Journal of Applied Ecology 34: 1070–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith, F.A., H. Browning, and U.L. Shepherd. 1998. The influence of climate change on the body mass of woodrats Neotoma in arid region of New Mexico, USA. Ecography 21: 140–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tveito, O.E., E. Førland, R. Heino, I. Hanssen-Bauer, S.H. Alexandersson, B. Dahlström, A. Dreb, C. Kern-Hansen, T. Jónsson, E. Vaarby Laursen, and Y. Westman. 2000. Nordic temperature maps. DNMIReport 09/00 Klima, 55 pp (in Swedish).Google Scholar
  31. Yom-Tov, Y. 2003. Body sizes of carnivores commensal with humans have increased over the past 50 years. Functional Ecology 17: 323–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yom-Tov, Y., T.M. Heggberget, Ø. Wiig, and S. Yom-Tov. 2006. Body size changes in the Norwegian otter: The possible effects of food availability and global warming. Oecologia 150: 155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yom-Tov, Y., S. Yom-Tov, D. MacDonald, and E. Yom-Tov. 2007. Population cycles, global warming and changes in body size of the lynx in Alaska. Oecologia 152: 239–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoram Yom-Tov
    • 1
  • Anna Roos
    • 2
  • Peter Mortensen
    • 3
  • Øystein Wiig
    • 4
  • Shlomith Yom-Tov
    • 1
  • Thrine M. Heggberget
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Contaminant ResearchSwedish Museum of Natural HistoryStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Department of Vertebrate ZoologySwedish Museum of Natural HistoryStockholmSweden
  4. 4.National Center for Biosystematics, Natural History MuseumUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  5. 5.Norwegian Institute for Nature ResearchTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations