, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 336–339 | Cite as

Fighting Corruption to Save the Environment: Cameroon’s Experience

  • Kelvin S.-H. Peh
  • Ofir Drori

The despair of losing battle against corruption in sub-Saharan Africa has recently made the headline of the International Herald Tribune (Dugger 2009). Such interest in the fight against corruption in tropical developing countries is based on the following socio-economic rationale: a reduction in accountability and transparency will enhance poverty and hinder economic and social developments in these poor countries (Kaufmann 1997). However, what lesser known is that corruption has also a negative impact on both a country’s environmental protection and conservation efforts.

A global index which measured the countries’ environmental performance (EPI) showed that the more corrupt a country is perceived to be, the poorer its environmental performance (Esty et al. 2008). The index uses 25 indicators such as water stress, conservation risk, forestry growing stock, intensive cropland and greenhouse gasses emissions per capita. It also takes into account the environmental burden of disease,...


Social Capital Environmental Performance Corruption Perception Index Corrupt Practice Illegal Hunter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This research is supported by Marie Curie EST Fellowship awarded to KSHP. We also thank all the supporters of the Last Great Ape Organization, Cameroon.


  1. Barrett, C.B., C.C. Gibson, B. Hoffman, and M.D. McCubbins. 2006. The complex links between governance and biodiversity. Conservation Biology 20: 1358–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caux Round Table. 2009. 2009 Social capital achievement country ranking.
  3. Dugger, C.W. 2009. Battle to halt graft scourge in Africa ebbs. International Herald Tribune, Jun 10, p. A1.Google Scholar
  4. Esty, D.C., M.A. Levy, C.H. Kim, A. De Sherbinin, T. Srebotnjak, and V. Mara. 2008. 2008 Environmental performance index. New Haven: Yale Center for Environment law and Policy.Google Scholar
  5. Ferraro, P. 2005. Corruption and conservation: The need for empirical analyses. A response to Smith & Walpole. Oryx 39: 257–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hobbs, G. 2000. What is social capital?
  7. Katzner, T.E. 2005. Corruption—a double-edged sword for conservation? A response to Smith & Walpole. Oryx 39: 260–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kaufmann, D. 1997. Corruption: The facts. Foreign Policy 107: 114–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kwang Komenta, R. 2006. Transparency supports anti-corruption efforts. Cameroon Tribune, Mar 15, p. 4.Google Scholar
  10. Laurance, W.F. 2004. The perils of payoff: Corruption as a threat to global biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19: 399–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mo Ibrahim Foundation. 2009. The Ibrahim index of African governance.
  12. Peh, K.S.-H. 2008. Cameroon’s lessons in conservation for sub-Saharan Africa. BioScience 58: 678–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Smith, R.J., R.D.J. Muir, M.J. Walpole, A. Balmford, and N. Leader-Williams. 2003. Governance and the loss of biodiversity. Nature 426: 67–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Smith, R.J., and M.J. Walpole. 2005. Should conservationists pay more attention to corruption? Oryx 39: 251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. The Last Great Ape Organization. 2009. LAGA—the Last Great Ape Organization.
  16. Transparency International. 2008. TI corruption perceptions index.
  17. Vubem, F. 2006. State officials drilled on anti-corruption mechanisms. Cameroon Tribune, Mar 3, p. 10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Geography, Earth and Biosphere InstituteUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.Anti-corruption OrganizationYaoundéCameroon

Personalised recommendations