Advertisement

AMBIO

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 269–278 | Cite as

Effects of Modern Forest Management on Winter Grazing Resources for Reindeer in Sweden

  • Sonja Kivinen
  • Jon Moen
  • Anna Berg
  • Åsa Eriksson
Report
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

Boreal forests in Sweden are exploited in a number of ways, including forestry and reindeer husbandry. In the winter, reindeer feed mainly on lichens, and lichen-rich forests are a key resource in the herding system. Commercial forestry has mainly negative effects on reindeer husbandry, and conflicts between these two industries have escalated over the last century. This article reviews the effects of modern forest management practices on the winter resources available for reindeer husbandry. Forestry affects reindeer husbandry at both the stand level and the landscape level and over various time scales. Clear-cutting, site preparation, fertilization, short rotation times, and forest fragmentation have largely resulted in a reduced amount of ground growing and arboreal lichens and restricted access to resource. This article also discusses alternative forestry practices and approaches that could reduce the impacts of forestry on reindeer husbandry, both in the short and long term.

Keywords

Reindeer herding Lichens Forestry Boreal forest 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgment

This study was financed by Sveaskog, the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning, and by the Academy of Finland.

References

  1. Åhman, G., and B. Åhman. 1984. Effects of forest fertilization on nitrate and crude protein content in some important reindeer forage species. Rangifer 4: 43–53.Google Scholar
  2. Ahti, T. 1961. Taxonomic studies on reindeer lichens (Cladonia, subgenus Cladina). Annales Botanici Societatis’Vanamo’ 32: 1–160.Google Scholar
  3. Anon. 2006. Samernas sedvanemarker - Sami customary lands. SOU 2006:14, Stockholm (in Swedish).Google Scholar
  4. Apps, C., B.N. McLellan, T.A. Kinley, and J.P. Flaa. 2001. Scale-dependent habitat selection by Mountain Caribou, Columbia Mountains, British Columbia. The Journal of Wildlife Management 65: 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg, A., L. Östlund, J. Moen, and J. Olofsson. 2008. A century of logging and forestry in a reindeer herding area in northern Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management 256: 1009–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boström, M. 2004. Available reindeer pasture on Myrtillus-, Calluna/Empetrum- and lichen land approx 50 years after a fire/prescribed burning. Master’s Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Silviculture, 23 pp. (in Swedish).Google Scholar
  7. Bråkenhielm, S., and Q. Liu. 1998. Long-term effects of clear-felling on vegetation dynamics and species diversity in a boreal pine forest. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bråkenhielm, S., and H. Persson. 1980. Vegetation dynamics in developing Scots pine stands in central Sweden. Ecological Bulletins 32: 139–152.Google Scholar
  9. Danell, Ö. 2005. Renskötselns robusthet - behov av nytt synsätt för att tydliggöra rennäringens förutsättningar och hållbarhet i dess socioekologiska sammanhang—The robustness of reindeer husbandry—need for a new approach to elucidate opportunities and sustainability of the reindeer industry in its socio-ecological context. Rangifer Report 10: 39–49 (in Swedish).Google Scholar
  10. Dettki, H. 1998. Dispersal of fragments of two pendulous lichen species. Sauteria 9: 123–132.Google Scholar
  11. Elfving, B., T. Ericsson, and O. Rosvall. 2001. The introduction of lodgepole pine for wood production in Sweden—a review. Forest Ecology and Management 141: 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eriksson, O. 1980. Effects of forest fertilization on the cratering intensity of reindeer. In Proceedings of the 2nd international reindeer/caribou symposium, Röros, Norway, 1979, 26–40.Google Scholar
  13. Eriksson, O., and T. Raunistola. 1990. Impact of soil scarification on reindeer pastures. Rangifer Special Issue 3: 99–106.Google Scholar
  14. Eriksson, O., and T. Raunistola. 1993. Impact of forest fertilizers on winter pastures of semi-domesticated reindeer. Rangifer 13: 203–214.Google Scholar
  15. Esseen, P.-A., B. Ehnström, L. Ericson, and K. Sjöberg. 1997. Boreal forests. Ecological Bulletins 46: 16–47.Google Scholar
  16. Esseen, P.-A., K.-E. Renhom, and R. Pettersson. 1996. Epiphytic lichen biomass in managed and old-growth boreal forests: Effect of branch quality. Ecological Applications 6: 228–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fries, C., O. Johansson, B. Pettersson, and P. Simonsson. 1997. Silvicultural models to maintain and restore natural stand structures in Swedish boreal forests. Forest Ecology and Management 94: 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gauslaa, Y., K. Palmqvist, K.A. Solhaug, H. Holien, O. Hilmo, L. Nybakken, L.C. Myhre, and M. Ohlson. 2007. Growth of epiphytic old forest lichens across climatic and successional gradients. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 37: 1832–1845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Golding, D.L., and R.H. Swanson. 1986. Snow distribution patterns in clearings and adjacent forest. Water Resources Research 22: 1931–1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hannerz, M., and B. Hånell. 1997. Effects on the flora in Norway spruce forests following clearcutting and shelterwood cutting. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heggeberget, T., E.M. Gaare, and J.P. Ball. 2002. Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) and climate change: Importance of winter forage. Rangifer 22: 13–32.Google Scholar
  22. Helle, T., and J. Aspi. 1984. Prescribed burning from the viewpoint of reindeer husbandry. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae 120: 97–101.Google Scholar
  23. Helle, T., J. Aspi, and S.-S. Kilpelä. 1990. The effects of stand characteristics on reindeer lichens and range use by semi-domesticated reindeer. Rangifer Special Issue 3: 107–114.Google Scholar
  24. Huusko, U. 2008. Poro ja poronhoito talousmetsissä – Reindeer and reindeer husbandry in managed forests, 31. Rovaniemi: Lapin Metsäkeskus (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  25. Hyvärinen, M., B. Walter, and R. Koopmann. 2003. Impact of fertilisation on phenol content and growth rate of Cladina stellaris: A test of the carbon-nutrient balance hypothesis. Oecologia 134: 176–181.Google Scholar
  26. Jonsson Čabrajić, A. 2009. Modeling lichen performance in relation to climate: scaling from thalli to landscapes. PhD Thesis, Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, Umeå, 38 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Kellner, O. 1993. Effects on associated flora of sylvicultural nitrogen fertilization repeated at long intervals. Journal of Applied Ecology 30: 563–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kivinen, S., A. Berg, J. Moen, L. Östlund, and J. Olofsson. 2009. Fragmentation and landscape transformation in a reindeer husbandry area in Sweden. Submitted manuscript.Google Scholar
  29. Kumpula, J., A. Colpaert, and M. Anttonen. 2007. Does forest harvesting and linear infrastructure change the usability value of pastureland for semi-domesticated reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus)? Annales Zoologici Fennici 44: 161–178.Google Scholar
  30. Lidén, M., M. Pettersson, U. Bergsten, and T. Lundmark. 2005. Artificial dispersal of endangered epiphytic lichens: A tool for conservation in boreal forest. Biological Conservation 118: 431–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lundmark, L. 1982. Uppbörd, utarmning, utveckling. Det samiska fångstsamhällets övergång till rennomadism i Lule lappmark - Levies, impoverishment, development. The transition of the Sami hunter community to reindeer nomadism in Lule Lappmark. Arkiv för studier i arbetarrörelsens historia. Lund (in Swedish).Google Scholar
  32. Makkonen, S., R.S.K. Hurri, and M. Hyvärinen. 2007. Differential responses of lichen symbionts to enhanced nitrogen and phosphorus availability: An experiment with Cladina stellaris. Annals of Botany 99: 877–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moen, J. 2008. Climate change: Effects of the ecological basis for reindeer husbandry in Sweden. Ambio 37: 304–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moen, J., R. Andersen, and A.W. Illius. 2006. Living in a seasonal environment. In Large herbivore ecology, ecosystem dynamics and conservation, ed. K. Danell, P. Duncan, R. Bergström, and J. Pastor, 50–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moen, J., and Ö. Danell. 2003. Reindeer in the Swedish mountains: An assessment of grazing impacts. Ambio 32: 397–402.Google Scholar
  36. Morneau, C., and S. Payette. 1989. Postfire lichen-spruce woodland recovery at the limit of the boreal forest in northern Quebec. Canadian Journal of Botany 67: 2770–2782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nieppola, J. 1992. Long-term vegetation changes in stands of Pinus sylvestris in southern Finland. Journal of Vegetation Science 3: 475–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nilsson, C., O. Engelmark, J. Cory, A. Forsslund, and E. Carlborg. 2008. Differences in litter cover and understorey flora between stands of introduced lodgepole pine and native Scots pine in Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management 255: 1900–1905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nohrstedt, H.-Ö. 2001. Response of coniferous forest ecosystems on mineral soils to nutrient additions: A review of Swedish experiences. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 16: 555–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. O’Brien, D., M. Manseau, A. Fall, and M.-J. Fortin. 2006. Testing the importance of spatial configuration of winter habitat for woodland caribou: An application of graph theory. Biological Conservation 130: 70–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Olsson, B.A., and O. Kellner. 2006. Long-term effects of nitrogen fertilization on ground vegetation in coniferous forests. Forest Ecology and Management 237: 458–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Olsson, B.A., and H. Staaf. 1995. Influence of harvesting intensity of logging residues on ground vegetation in coniferous forests. Journal of Applied Ecology 32: 640–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Örlander, G., and A. Gemmel. 1989. Markberedning – Soil preparation. Sveriges Skogsvårdsförbunds Tidskrift 3: 1–53 (in Swedish).Google Scholar
  44. Östlund, L., O. Zackrisson, and A.L. Axelsson. 1997. The history and transformation of a Scandinavian boreal forest landscape since the 19th century. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27: 1198–1206.Google Scholar
  45. Ottosson-Löfvenius, M., M. Kluge, and T. Lundmark. 2003. Snow and soil frost depth in two types of shelterwood and clear-cut area. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 18: 54–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Palmqvist, K., and B. Sundberg. 2000. Light use efficiency of dry matter gain in five macro-lichens: Relative impact of microclimate and species-specific traits. Plant, Cell & Environment 23: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pitman, R.M. 2006. Wood ash use in forestry—a review of the environmental impacts. Forestry 79: 563–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Roturier, S., S. Bäcklund, M. Sundén, and U. Bergsten. 2007. Influence of ground substrate on establishment of reindeer lichen after artificial dispersal. Silva Fennica 41: 269–280.Google Scholar
  49. Roturier, S., and U. Bergsten. 2006. Influence of soil scarification on reindeer foraging and damage to planted Pinus sylvestris seedlings. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 21: 209–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Roturier, S., and M. Roué. 2009. Of forest, snow and lichen: Sámi reindeer herders’ knowledge of winter pastures in northern Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management 258: 1960–1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sandström, C., J. Moen, C. Widmark, and Ö. Danell. 2006. Progressing toward co-management through collaborative learning: Forestry and reindeer husbandry in dialogue. International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management 2: 326–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stevenson, S. 1990. Managing second-growth forests as caribou habitat. Rangifer 3: 139–144.Google Scholar
  53. Sulyma, R., and D.S. Coxson. 2001. Microsite displacement of terrestrial lichens by feather moss mats in late seral pine-lichen woodlands of North-central British Columbia. The Bryologist 4: 505–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Swedish Forest Agency. 2009. Swedish statistical yearbook of forestry. Official statistics of Sweden, 392. Jönköping.Google Scholar
  55. Thomas, D.C., S.J. Barry, and G. Alaie. 1996. Fire–caribou–winter range relationships in northern Canada. Rangifer 16: 57–67.Google Scholar
  56. Vistnes, I., and C. Nellemann. 2008. The matter of spatial and temporal scales: A review of reindeer and caribou response to human activity. Polar Biology 31: 399–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Widmark, C. 2006. Forestry and reindeer husbandry in Sweden—the development of a land use conflict. Rangifer 26: 43–53.Google Scholar
  58. Zackrisson, O. 1977. Influence of forest fire on the North Swedish boreal forest. Oikos 29: 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sonja Kivinen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jon Moen
    • 2
  • Anna Berg
    • 3
  • Åsa Eriksson
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Environmental ScienceUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  3. 3.Department of Forest Ecology and ManagementSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUmeåSweden
  4. 4.Department of Forest Resource ManagementSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options