Abstract
The life of impoverished people can be damaged by adverse environmental conditions, but these people can also be harmed by environmental conservation programs, particularly when the guiding policy ignores their needs. To improve the social and economic effectiveness of environmental protection, governments must understand that the ultimate goal of environmental protection is to improve human livelihoods, not just restore vegetation. The elimination of poverty by the development of sustainable, long-term enterprises is a precondition for successful ecological restoration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, W.M., R. Aveling, D. Brockington, B. Dickson, J. Elliott, et al. 2004. Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science 306: 1146–1149.
Agudelo, C., B. Rivera, J. Tapasco, and R. Estrada. 2003. Designing policies to reduce rural poverty and environmental degradation in a hillside zone of the Colombian Andes. World Development 11: 1921–1931.
Balmford, A., J.L. Moore, T. Brooks, N. Burgess, L.A. Hansen, et al. 2001. Conservation conflicts across Africa. Science 291: 2616–2619.
Bonabeau, E. 2002. Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99: 7280–7287.
Börner, J., A. Mendoza, and S.A. Vosti. 2007. Ecosystem services, agriculture, and rural poverty in the Eastern Brazilian Amazon: Interrelationships and policy prescriptions. Ecological Economics 64: 356–373.
Cao, S., L. Chen, and Z. Liu. 2009a. An investigation of Chinese attitudes towards the environment: Case study using the Grain for Green Project. Ambio 38: 55–64.
Cao, S., X. Wang, and G. Wang. 2009b. Lessons learned from China’s fall into the poverty trap. Journal of Policy Model 31: 298–307.
Cao, S., C. Xu, L. Chen, and X. Wang. 2009c. Attitudes of farmers in China’s northern Shaanxi Province towards the land-use changes required under the Grain for Green Project, and implications for the program’s success. Land Use Policy 26: 1182–1194.
China Statistics Bureau. 2006. Statistical Yearbook of China. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
Drechsler, M., F. Watzold, K. Johst, H. Bergmann, and J. Settele. 2007. A model-based approach for designing cost-effective compensation payments for conservation of endangered species in real landscapes. Biological Conservation 140: 174–186.
Engel, S., S. Pagiola, and S. Wunder. 2008. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecological Economics 65: 663–674.
Jiang, G. 2005. Stamp out the erroneous understanding of desertification control. Science and Culture 8: 14–18. (in Chinese).
Jiao, J. 2005. Rural education and duality economic society. Study and Exploration 158: 171–178. (in Chinese).
Kareiva, P. 2008. Ominous trends in nature recreation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 2757–2758.
Kates, R.W., and P. Dasgupta. 2007. African poverty: A grand challenge for sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 16747–16750.
Kerr, J. 2002. Watershed development, environmental services, and poverty alleviation in India. World Development 30: 1387–1400.
Li, F., W. Li, and M. Liu. 2008. Forest eco-compensation mechanisms: A survey. Ecological Economics 4: 115–126.
Liu, J., and J. Diamond. 2008. Revolutionizing China’s environmental protection. Science 319: 37–38.
Mez-Pompa, A.G., and A. Kaus. 1999. From pre-Hispanic to future conservation alternatives: Lessons from Mexico. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96: 5982–5986.
Pagiola, S., A. Arcenas, and G. Platais. 2005. Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World Development 33: 237–253.
Sachs, J.D., and W.V. Reid. 2006. Investments toward sustainable development. Science 312: 1002.
Sanchez, P., C. Palm, J. Sachs, G. Denning, R. Flor, et al. 2007. The African millennium villages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 16775–16780.
Sanchez, P.A., and M.S. Swaminathan. 2005. Cutting world hunger in half. Science 307: 357–359.
Scarborough, V.L. 2003. How to interpret an ancient landscape. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100: 4366–4368.
SFA. 2007. China forestry development report. Beijing: China Forestry Press.
Team of Social Harmony. 2005. Social harmony construction and plan as a whole development of rural and urban. Economic Research Consultants 1885: 13–19. (in Chinese).
Wang, G., J.L. Innes, J. Lei, S. Dai, and S.W. Wu. 2007. China’s forestry reforms. Science 318: 1556–1557.
Wang, C., and G. Zei. 2006. Another big hydropower base in China—Nujiang River hydropower base. Water Power 32(5): 1–4. (in Chinese).
Xin, H. 2008. China’s environmental challenges: A green fervor sweeps the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Science 321: 633–635.
Xu, J., Y. Yu, C. Xie, C. Li, B. Chen, et al. 2003. Impact of natural forestry conservation to collectivity forestry and community economic development. Forest Economy 6: 28–32. (in Chinese).
Zhang X. 2004. Thinking of the large water power engineering facilities (dams) from the perspective of economics. Quantitative and Technical Economics 7: 66–75 (in Chinese).
Zhou, J., Z. Pen, S. Fei, D. Li, Q. Sun, and L. Qi. 2007. A discussion on compensation of forest ecological engineering benefit. Journal of Forest Research 18(2): 157–164.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Science and Technology Project of Forestry of China (2006BAD03A0302). We thank Geoffrey Hart in Canada for his help in writing this article. We are also grateful for the comments and criticisms of an anonymous reviewer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cao, S., Chen, L. & Zhu, Q. Remembering the Ultimate Goal of Environmental Protection: Including Protection of Impoverished Citizens in China’s Environmental Policy. AMBIO 39, 439–442 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0043-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0043-2