Advertisement

AMBIO

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 85–90 | Cite as

Climate Change and Peak Oil: The Urgent Need for a Transition to a Non-Carbon-Emitting Society

  • Josep Peñuelas
  • Jofre Carnicer
Synopsis

The strong environmental effects of greenhouse gas emissions derived from oil use and the negative socioeconomic consequences of future oil scarcity make it urgent that we shift to alternative affordable energy sources. Here we briefly overview the multiple economic, technological, and political pathways that should be implemented immediately to achieve this global energetic transition. We discuss how states could empower their national strategies to improve the efficiency in energy generation, transmission, and consumption and thus progressively reduce carbon emissions. At the international level, we suggest that governments should strongly promote multilateral and bilateral cooperative agreements on energy and climate policies. In addition, we suggest that states should promote the creation of a United Nations international program to facilitate and coordinate a worldwide ordered and nontraumatic transition to low-carbon and energy-efficient economies. Finally, we advocate for a...

Keywords

Carbon Taxis International Energy Agency Renewable Electricity Current Financial Crisis Geological Carbon Sequestration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Sergi Armengol, Salvador Pueyo, Miguel Muñiz, and Aglaia and Daniel Gómez for useful suggestions. This research is funded by grants from the Spanish Government (CGL2006-04025/BOS and Consolider project Montes CSD2008-00040), the Catalan Government (SGR 2009-458), and Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (PIF08-006-3).

References

  1. Agrawal, R., N.R. Singh, F.H. Ribeiro, and W.N. Delgass. 2007. Sustainable fuel for the transportation sector. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 4828–4833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armand, M., and J.-M. Tarascon. 2008. Building better batteries. Nature 451: 652–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belyaev, L.S., O.V. Marchenko, and S.V. Solomin. 2005. A study of wind energy contribution to global change mitigation. International Journal of Energy Technology and Policy 3: 324–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bisquert, J. 2008. The two sides of solar energy. Nature Photonics 2: 648–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brandt, A.R. 2007. Testing Hubbert. Energy Policy 35: 3074–3088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, C., and J.H. Laherrère. 1998. The end of cheap oil. Scientific American 278: 78–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Canadell, J.G., C. Le Quere, M.R. Raupach, C.B. Field, E.T. Buitenhuis, P. Ciais, T.J. Conway, N.P. Gillett, et al. 2007. Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 18866–18870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Canadell, J.G., and M.R. Raupach. 2008. Managing forests for climate change mitigation. Science 320: 1456–1457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cavallo, A.J. 2004. Hubbert’s petroleum production model: An evaluation and implications for world oil production forecasts. Natural Resources Research 13: 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cavallo, A.J. 2007. When the oil supply runs out. Science 316: 980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coll-Mayor, D., M. Paget, E. Lightner, and M. Sanchez-Jimenez. 2006. Visions of future power grids: Synergies for collaboration between the European Union and United States. International Journal of Distributed Energy Resources 3: 1–7.Google Scholar
  12. Dietz, S., and N. Stern. 2008. Why economic analysis supports strong action on climate change: A response to the Stern review’s critics. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2: 94–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dreber, A., and M.A. Nowak. 2008. Gambling for global goods. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 2261–2262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Energy Information Administration. 2008. International energy outlook. Washington: US Department of Energy, 250 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Field, C.B., J.E. Campbell, and D.B. Lobell. 2008. Biomass energy: The scale of the potential resource. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23: 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Funk, C., M.D. Dettinger, J.C. Michaelsen, J.P. Verdin, M.E. Brown, M. Barlow, and A. Hoell. 2008. Warming of the Indian Ocean threatens eastern and southern African food security but could be mitigated by agricultural development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 11081–11086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldberg, D.S., T. Takahashi, and A.L. Slagle. 2008. Carbon dioxide sequestration in deep-sea basalt. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 9920–9925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gullison, R.E., P.C. Frumhoff, J.G. Canadell, C.B. Field, D.C. Nepstad, K. Hayhoe, R. Avissar, L.M. Curran, et al. 2007. Tropical forests and climate policy. Science 316: 985–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haines, A., K.R. Smith, D. Anderson, P.R. Epstein, A.J. McMichael, I. Roberts, P. Wilkinson, J. Woodcock, et al. 2007. Policies for accelerating access to clean energy, improving health, advancing development, and mitigating climate change. Lancet 370: 1264–1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoffert, M.I., K. Caldeira, G. Benford, D.R. Criswell, C. Green, H. Herzog, A.K. Jain, H.S. Kheshgi, et al. 2002. Advanced technology paths to global climate stability: Energy for a greenhouse planet. Science 298: 981–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hubbert, M.K. 1949. Energy from fossil fuels. Science 109: 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hubbert, M.K. 1956. Nuclear energy and the fossil fuels. Houston, TX: Shell Development Company, 40 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007a. The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 989 pp.Google Scholar
  24. IPCC. 2007b. Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 976 pp.Google Scholar
  25. International Energy Agency. 2008a. World energy outlook. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/International Energy Agency, 578 pp.Google Scholar
  26. International Energy Agency. 2008b. Deploying Renewables. Paris, France: OECD/IEA, 200 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Jackson, R.B., E.G. Jobbágy, R. Avissar, S.B. Roy, D.J. Barrett, C.W. Cook, K.A. Farley, D.C. Le Maitre, et al. 2005. Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 310: 1944–1947.Google Scholar
  28. Jacobson, M.Z., W.G. Colella, and D.M. Golden. 2005. Cleaning the air and improving health with hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles. Science 308: 1901–1905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keith, D.W., M. Ha-Duong, and J.K. Stolaroff. 2006. Climate strategy with CO2 capture from the air. Climatic Change 74: 17–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kelemen, P.B., and J. Matter. 2008. In situ carbonation of peridotite for CO2 storage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 17295–17300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kerr, R.A. 2008. World oil crunch looming? Science 322: 1178–1779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kharecha, P.A., and J.E. Hansen. 2008. Implications of “peak oil” for atmospheric CO2 and climate. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 22: GB3012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kiers, E.T., R.R.B. Leakey, A. Izac, J.A. Heinemann, E. Rosenthal, D. Nathan, and J. Jiggins. 2008. Agriculture at a crossroads. Science 320: 320–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kindermann, G., M. Obersteiner, B. Sohngen, J. Sathaye, K. Andrasko, E. Rametsteiner, B. Schlamadinger, S. Wunder, et al. 2008. Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 10302–10307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lewis, N.S. 2007. Toward cost-effective solar energy use. Science 315: 798–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lobell, D.B., M.B. Burke, C. Tebaldi, M.D. Mastrandrea, W.P. Falcon, and R.L. Naylor. 2008. Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science 319: 607–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mao, W.L., and H. Mao. 2004. Hydrogen storage in molecular compounds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101: 708–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marnay, C. 2008. Microgrids and heterogeneous power quality and reliability. International Journal of Distributed Energy Resources 4: 281–295.Google Scholar
  39. Maugeri, L. 2004. Oil: Never cry wolf. Why the petroleum age is far from over. Science 304: 1114–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Metcalf, G.E. 2009. Designing a carbon tax to reduce US greenhouse gas emissions. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 3: 63–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Milinski, M., R.D. Sommerfeld, H.-J. Krambeck, F.A. Reed, and J. Marotzke. 2008. The collective-risk social dilemma and the prevention of simulated dangerous climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 2291–2294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nordhaus, W.D. 2007. To tax or not to tax: Alternative approaches to slowing global warming. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 1: 26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. OECD. 2005. Environmentally harmful subsidies: Challenges for reform. OECD Publishing, 160 pp.Google Scholar
  44. Paccala, S., and R. Socolow. 2004. Stabilization wedges: Solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science 305: 968–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Patchkovskii, S., J.S. Tse, S.N. Yurchenko, L. Zhechkov, T. Heine, and G. Seifert. 2005. Graphene nanostructures as tunable storage media for molecular hydrogen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 10439–10444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pielke, J. 2009. An idealized assessment of the economics of air capture of carbon dioxide in mitigation policy. Environmental Science & Policy 12: 216–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Potocnik, J. 2007. Renewable energy sources and the realities of setting and energy agenda. Science 315: 810–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Prins, G., and S. Rayner. 2007. Time to ditch Kyoto. Nature 449: 973–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ragauskas, A.J., C.K. Williams, B.H. Davison, G. Britovsek, J. Cairney, C.A. Eckert, W.J. Frederick, J.P. Hallet, et al. 2006. The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science 311: 484–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ramathan, V., and Y. Feng. 2008. On avoiding dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system: Formidable challenges ahead. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 14245–14250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ropenus, S., and K. Skytte. 2007. Regulatory review and barriers for the electricity supply system for distributed generation in the EU-15. International Journal of Distributed Energy Resources 3: 243–257.Google Scholar
  52. Service, R.S. 2007. Is it time to shoot for the sun? Science 309: 548–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shrag, D.P. 2007. Preparing to capture carbon. Science 315: 812–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stephanopoulos, G. 2007. Challenges in engineering microbes for biofuels production. Science 315: 801–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stern, N. 2006. The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 712 pp.Google Scholar
  56. United Nations. 2008a. Cross-border energy trade and its impact on the poor: Synthesis report. Bangkok, Thailand: United Nations Publications, 120 pp.Google Scholar
  57. United Nations. 2008b. The millennium development goals report. United Nations Publications, 53 pp.Google Scholar
  58. Van Vuuren, D.P., M. Meinshausen, G.-K. Plattner, F. Joos, K.M. Strassmann, S.J. Smith, T.M. Wigley, S.C.B. Raper, et al. 2008. Temperature increase of 21st century mitigation scenarios. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 15258–15262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Victor, D.G., J.H. House, and S. Joy. 2005. A Madisonian approach to climate policy. Science 309: 1820–1821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wara, M. 2007. Is the global carbon market working? Nature 445: 595–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Global Ecology Unit CSIC-CEAB-CREAF, CREAF, Edifici CUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBellaterraSpain

Personalised recommendations