The Costs of Meeting the Environmental Objectives for the Baltic Sea: A Review of the Literature
- 286 Downloads
The environmental targets of the recently agreed Baltic Sea Action Plan (BSAP) targets are likely associated with a considerable cost, which motivates a search for low-cost policies. The following review shows there is a substantial literature on cost-efficient nutrient reduction strategies, including suggestions regarding low-cost abatement, but actual policies at international and national scale tend to be considerably more expensive due to lack of instruments that ensure a cost-efficient allocation of abatement across countries and sectors. Economic research on the costs of reducing hazardous substances and oil spill damages in the Baltic Sea is not available, but lessons from the international literature suggest that resources could be used more efficiently if appropriate analysis is undertaken. Common to these pollution problems is the need to ensure that all countries in the region are provided with positive incentives to implement international agreements.
KeywordsBaltic Sea Action Plan (BSAP) Costs Review Eutrophication Hazardous substances
Financial support from the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency is gratefully acknowledged. The author is also indebted to two anonymous referees for helpful comments.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- Aps, R., J. Kotta, R. Leiger, G. Martin, T. Saat, Ü. Suursaar, et al. 2007. Net environmental benefit analysis—linking ecological values in the decision making process on oil spill response in the Gulf of Finland (Baltic Sea). ICES CM 2007/C:10, 16 pp.Google Scholar
- Arheimer, B., J. Andréasson, S. Fogelberg, H. Johnsson, C.B. Pers, and K. Persson. 2005. Climate change impact on water quality: Model results from Southern Sweden. AMBIO 34(7): 559–566.Google Scholar
- Bigano, A. and Sheehan, P. 2006. Assessing the risk of oil spills in the Mediterranean: The case of the route from the Black Sea to Italy. FEEM Working Paper No. 32. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Trieste.Google Scholar
- COWI. 2007. Economic analysis of the BSAP with focus on eutrophication. Final report. April 2007, 112 pp.Google Scholar
- De Cerreño, A.L.C., M. Panero, and S. Boehme. 2002. Pollution prevention and management strategies for mercury in the New York/New Jersey harbor. New York Academy of Sciences, New York, 116 pp.Google Scholar
- EC. 2008. Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive). As available 9/5/2008 at http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:164:0019:0040:EN:PDF, 22 pp.
- Elofsson, K., and I.-M. Gren. 2004. Cost-effectiveness in Swedish environmental policy—an evaluation. Ekonomisk Debatt 3: 57–68 (In Swedish).Google Scholar
- Etkin, D.S. 2000. Worldwide analysis of marine oil spill cleanup cost factors. Paper presented at 23rd Arctic and Marine Oilspill Program Technical Seminar, Winchester.Google Scholar
- Gaiser, T., M. Henseler, K. Zardava, C. Kiourtsidis, J. Ganoulis, A. Printz, et al. 2007. Estimating the effects of the EU Common Agricultural Policy on ground and surface water quality: A case study in the Neckar Basin. Paper presented at the conference on the science and education of land use: A transatlantic, multidisciplinary and comparative approach (TALUC). The Westin Washington DC City Center (USA), 24–26.09.2007.Google Scholar
- Gren, I.-M. 2000. Cost-effective nutrient reductions to the Baltic Sea. In Managing a Sea, ed. Gren, I.-M., K. Turner and F. Wulff, 152 pp. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Gren, I-M. 2008a. Costs and benefits from nutrient reductions to the Baltic Sea. Report 5877. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm.Google Scholar
- Gren, I.-M. 2008b. Cost effectiveness and fairness of the HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan against eutrophication. Vatten 64: 273–281.Google Scholar
- HELCOM. 2007a. HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan. HELCOM Ministerial Meeting, Krakow, Poland, 15 Nov 2007.Google Scholar
- HELCOM. 2007b. Towards a Baltic Sea unaffected by hazardous substances. HELCOM Overview 2007. HELCOM Ministerial Meeting, Krakow, Poland, 15 Nov 2007.Google Scholar
- HELCOM. 2007c. Towards a Baltic Sea with environmentally friendly maritime activities. HELCOM Ministerial Meeting, Krakow, Poland, 15 Nov 2007.Google Scholar
- Krupnick, A., Austin, D., Morton, B., McConnell, V., Stoessell, T. and Cannon, M. 2005. The Chesapeake Bay and the control of NOx emissions: A policy analysis. Discussion paper RFF-DP-98-46. Resources for the future.Google Scholar
- Laugesen, J., Møskeland, T., Kelley, A., Jensen, T., 2001. Technical report, analysis of measures for removal of contaminated sediments in Kristiansandsfjorden. Den Norske Veritas (DNV), Høvik (In Norwegian).Google Scholar
- Nowicki, P., van Meijl, H., Knierim, A. Banse, M., Helming, J., Margraf, O., Matzdorf, B. Mnatsakanian, R. et al. 2007. Scenar 2020—Scenario study on agriculture and the rural world. Contract No. 30-CE-0040087/00-08. European Commission, Directorate-General Agriculture and Rural Development, Brussels.Google Scholar
- Ollikainen, M., and J. Honkatukia. 2001. Towards efficient pollution control in the Baltic Sea: An anatomy of current failure with suggestions for change. AMBIO 30(4): 245–253.Google Scholar
- Östblom, G. 2007. Nitrogen and sulphur outcomes of a carbon emissions target excluding traded allowances—an input—output analysis of the Swedish Case, Working Paper No 101. National Institute of Economic Research, Stockholm.Google Scholar
- Peirce, M., Jones, H., Passant, N. and Holland, M. 2002. Cost Curves for the Abatement of Heavy Metal, PAH and Dioxin Emissions. Report produced for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, the National Assembly for Wales, the Scottish Executive and the Department of the Environment in Northern Ireland. AEAT/R/ENV/0159 Issue 1. AEA Technology Environment, Abingdon, Oxfordshire.Google Scholar
- Schou, J.S., Neye, S.T. Lundhede, T. Martinsen, L. and Hasler, B. 2006. Modelling Cost-efficient reductions of nutrient loads to the Baltic Sea. Model specification, Data and Cost functions. NERI Technical Report No. 592. NERI, Copenhagen. 69 p.Google Scholar
- Selin, H., and S.D. VanDeveer. 2004. Baltic Sea hazardous substances management: Results and challenges. AMBIO 33(3): 153–160.Google Scholar
- Vandeven, J.A., and S.L. McGinnis. 2004. Cost-effectiveness of removing amalgam from dental wastewater. Journal of Californian Dentists Association 32(7): 564–573.Google Scholar