Advertisement

Genes & Genomics

, Volume 40, Issue 7, pp 755–766 | Cite as

Transcriptome analysis for identifying possible gene regulations during maize root emergence and formation at the initial growth stage

  • Sun-Goo Hwang
  • Kyung-Hee Kim
  • Byung-Moo Lee
  • Jun-Cheol Moon
Research Article

Abstract

The root plays an important role during plant development and growth, i.e., the plant body maintenance, nutrient storage, absorption of water, oxygen and nutrient from the soil, and storage of water and carbohydrates, etc. The objective of this study was attempted to determine root-specific genes at the initial developmental stages of maize by using network-based transcriptome analysis. The raw data obtained using RNA-seq were filtered for quality control of the reads with the FASTQC tool, and the filtered reads were pre-proceed using the TRIMMOMATIC tool. The enriched BINs of the DEGs were detected using PageMan analysis with the ORA_FISHER statistical test, and genes were assigned to metabolic pathways by using the MapMan tool, which was also used for detecting transcription factors (TFs). For reconstruction of the co-expression network, we used the algorithm for the reconstruction of accurate cellular networks (ARACNE) in the R package, and then the reconstructed co-expression network was visualized using the Cytoscape tool. RNA-seq. was performed using maize shoots and roots at different developmental stages of root emergence (6–10 days after planting, VE) and 1 week after plant emergence (V2). A total of 1286 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected in both tissues. Many DEGs involved in metabolic pathways exhibited altered mRNA levels between VE and V2. In addition, we observed gene expression changes for 113 transcription factors and found five enriched cis-regulatory elements in the 1-kb upstream regions of both DEGs. The network-based transcriptome analysis showed two modules as co-expressed gene clusters differentially expressed between the shoots and roots during plant development. The DEGs of one module exhibited gene expressional coherence in the maize root tips, suggesting that their functional relationships are associated with the initial developmental stage of the maize root. Finally, we confirmed reliable mRNA levels of the hub genes in the potential sub-network related to initial root development at the different developmental stages of VE, V2, and 2 weeks after plant emergence.

Keywords

Maize Root Initial developmental stage Differentially expressed genes RNA-Seq 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (Grant No. NRF-2015R1D1A4A01015702) as well as a grant from the Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, and Forestry (IPET) through Golden Seed Project, funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (213009-05-2-SB710), and the “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development” (Project No. PJ012649022018) of Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

13258_2018_687_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (259 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 1. Quality of RNA-seq data used in this study. (a) Box plot of FPKM values for all the genes after the normalization processing of raw data. (b) Hierarchical clustering of both samples, including the genes detected using RNA-seq. (PPTX 258 KB)
13258_2018_687_MOESM2_ESM.pptx (186 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 2. WGCNA analysis of DEGs. (a) A scale-free topology for the power adjacency function parameter. The left panel shows the scale-free fit index (y-axis) as a function of the soft-thresholding power (x-axis). The right panel displays the scale-free topology plot with a power adjacency function parameter of 5. (b) Hierarchical clustering of both modules. (PPTX 185 KB)
13258_2018_687_MOESM3_ESM.pptx (1.5 mb)
Supplementary Fig. 3. Expression patters of 3 potential hub genes retrieved from MaizeGDB (http://maizegdb.org/). Color represents the different transcript levels of gene in different maize tissues. (PPTX 1583 KB)
13258_2018_687_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx (25 kb)
Supplementary Table 1. List of CEL files obtained from NCBI GEO. (XLSX 24 KB)
13258_2018_687_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx (12 kb)
Supplementary Table 2. Mapped reads by Illumina high-throughput sequencing. (XLSX 11 KB)

References

  1. Ariel F, Diet A, Verdenaud M, Gruber V, Frugier F, Chan R, Crespi M (2010) Environmental regulation of lateral root emergence in Medicago truncatula requires the HD-Zip I transcription factor HB1. Plant Cell 22:2171–2183CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Baâtour O et al (2012) Effect of growth stages on phenolics content and antioxidant activities of shoots in sweet marjoram (Origanum majorana L.) varieties under salt stress. Afr J Biotechnol 11:16486–16493Google Scholar
  3. Bailey TL, Machanick P (2012) Inferring direct DNA binding from ChIP-sEq. Nucleic Acids Res 40:e128CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B (2014) Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai HG et al (2012) Mapping QTLs for root system architecture of maize (Zea mays L.) in the field at different developmental stages. Theor Appl Genet 125:1313–1324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chae K, Gonong BJ, Kim SC, Kieslich CA, Morikis D, Balasubramanian S, Lord EM (2010) A multifaceted study of stigma/style cysteine-rich adhesin (SCA)-like Arabidopsis lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) suggests diversified roles for these LTPs in plant growth and reproduction. J Exp Bot 61:4277–4290CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Coneva V et al (2014) Metabolic and co-expression network-based analyses associated with nitrate response in rice. Bmc Genomics 15:1056CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Fan K et al (2014) Molecular evolution and expansion analysis of the NAC transcription factor in Zea mays. PLoS ONE 9:e111837CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Gautier L, Cope L, Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA (2004) affy—analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level. Bioinformatics 20:307–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Guingo E, Hébert Y, Charcosset A (1998) Genetic analysis of root traits in maize. Agronomie 18:225–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guo DS et al (2015) The WRKY transcription factor WRKY71/EXB1 controls shoot branching by transcriptionally regulating RAX genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 27:3112–3127CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. He XJ et al (2016) Comparative RNA-seq analysis reveals that regulatory network of maize root development controls the expression of genes in response to N stress. PLoS ONE 11:e0151697CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2009) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4:44–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim SG, Kim SY, Park CM (2007) A membrane-associated NAC transcription factor regulates salt-responsive flowering via FLOWERING LOCUS T in Arabidopsis. Planta 226:647–654CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lan P, Li WF, Lin WD, Santi S, Schmidt W (2013) Mapping gene activity of Arabidopsis root hairs. Genome Biol 14:R67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Langfelder P, Horvath S (2008) WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform 9:559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lin WD, Liao YY, Yang TJW, Pan CY, Buckhout TJ, Schmidt W (2011) Coexpression-based clustering of Arabidopsis root genes predicts functional modules in early phosphate deficiency signaling. Plant Physiol 155:1383–1402CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu J, Li J, Chen F, Zhang F, Ren T, Zhuang Z, Mi G (2008) Mapping QTLs for root traits under different nitrate levels at the seedling stage in maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Soil 305:253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Loudet O, Gaudon V, Trubuil A, Daniel-Vedele F (2005) Quantitative trait loci controlling root growth and architecture in Arabidopsis thaliana confirmed by heterogeneous inbred family. Theor Appl Genet 110:742–753CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Makkena S, Lamb RS (2013) The bHLH transcription factor SPATULA regulates root growth by controlling the size of the root meristem. Bmc Plant Biol 13:1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Mano Y, Muraki M, Fujimori M, Takamizo T, Kindiger B (2005) Identification of QTL controlling adventitious root formation during flooding conditions in teosinte (Zea mays ssp. huehuetenangensis) seedlings. Euphytica 142:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Manoli A, Sturaro A, Trevisan S, Quaggiotti S, Nonis A (2012) Evaluation of candidate reference genes for qPCR in maize. J Plant Physiol 169:807–815CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Margolin AA, Nemenman I, Basso K, Wiggins C, Stolovitzky G, Dalla Favera R, Califano A (2006) ARACNE: An algorithm for the reconstruction of gene regulatory networks in a mammalian cellular context. BMC Bioinform 7:S7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. O’Keeffe K (2009) Maize growth & development. NSW Department of Primary Industries, State of New South WalesGoogle Scholar
  25. Pace J, Gardner C, Romay C, Ganapathysubramanian B, Lubberstedt T (2015) Genome-wide association analysis of seedling root development in maize (Zea mays L.). BMC Genomics 16:47CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Peng H et al (2015) Transcriptomic changes during maize roots development responsive to Cadmium (Cd) pollution using comparative RNAseq-based approach. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 464:1040–1047CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Raun AL, Borum J, Sand-Jensen K (2010) Influence of sediment organic enrichment and water alkalinity on growth of aquatic isoetid and elodeid plants. Freshwater Biol 55:1891–1904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ravid U, Ikan R, Sachs RM (1975) Structures related to jasmonic acid and their effect on lettuce seedling growth. J Agr Food Chem 23:835–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Russell RS (1978) Plant root systems: their function and interaction with the soil. Soil Sci 125:272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ryan PR, Kochian LV (1993) Interaction between aluminum toxicity and calcium uptake at the root apex in near-isogenic lines of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) differing in aluminum tolerance. Plant Physiol 102:975–982CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Sack FD (1991) Plant gravity sensing. Int Rev Cytol 127:193–252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Salazar-Henao JE, Lin WD, Schmidt W (2016) Discriminative gene co-expression network analysis uncovers novel modules involved in the formation of phosphate deficiency-induced root hairs in Arabidopsis. Sci Rep 6:26820CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Schiefelbein JW, Benfey PN (1991) The development of plant roots: new approaches to underground problems. Plant Cell 3:1147–1154CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Sekhon RS, Lin HN, Childs KL, Hansey CN, Buell CR, de Leon N, Kaeppler SM (2011) Genome-wide atlas of transcription during maize development. Plant J 66:553–563CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Shannon P et al (2003) Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 13:2498–2504CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Staswick PE, Su W, Howell SH (1992) Methyl jasmonate inhibition of root growth and induction of a leaf protein are decreased in an Arabidopsis thaliana mutant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:6837–6840CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Thimm O et al (2004) MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J 37:914–939CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Tomic S, Gabdoulline RR, Kojic-Prodic B, Wade RC (1998) Classification of auxin related compounds based on similarity of their interaction fields: extension to a new set of compounds. Internet J Chem 1:26Google Scholar
  39. Trapnell C, Pachter L, Salzberg SL (2009) TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-seq. Bioinformatics 25:1105–1111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Trapnell C et al (2012) Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc 7:562–578CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Usadel B et al (2006) PageMan: an interactive ontology tool to generate, display, and annotate overview graphs for profiling experiments. BMC Bioinform 7:535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wei KF, Zhong XJ (2014) Non-specific lipid transfer proteins in maize. BMC Plant Biol 14:281CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Wei HR, Yordanov YS, Georgieva T, Li X, Busov V (2013) Nitrogen deprivation promotes Populus root growth through global transcriptome reprogramming and activation of hierarchical genetic networks. New Phytol 200:483–497CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Yilmaz A, Nishiyama MY, Fuentes BG, Souza GM, Janies D, Gray J, Grotewold E (2009) GRASSIUS: a platform for comparative regulatory genomics across the grasses. Plant Physiol 149:171–180CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Zimmermann P, Hirsch-Hoffmann M, Hennig L, Gruissem W (2004) GENEVESTIGATOR. Arabidopsis microarray database and analysis toolbox. Plant Physiol 136:2621–2632CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Zou ZW, Ishida M, Li F, Kakizaki T, Suzuki S, Kitashiba H, Nishio T (2013) QTL analysis using SNP markers developed by next-generation sequencing for identification of candidate genes controlling 4-methylthio-3-butenyl glucosinolate contents in roots of radish, Raphanus sativus L. PLoS ONE 8:e53541CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Genetics Society of Korea and Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Plant Genomics Laboratory, Department of Applied Plant SciencesKangwon National UniversityChuncheonRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Life ScienceDongguk University-SeoulSeoulRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Agriculture and Life Sciences Research InstituteKangwon National UniversityChuncheonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations