Complete genome sequence of uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolate UPEC 26-1
- 13 Downloads
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common infections in humans, predominantly caused by uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC). The diverse genomes of UPEC strains mostly impede disease prevention and control measures. In this study, we comparatively analyzed the whole genome sequence of a highly virulent UPEC strain, namely UPEC 26-1, which was isolated from urine sample of a patient suffering from UTI in Korea. Whole genome analysis showed that the genome consists of one circular chromosome of 5,329,753 bp, comprising 5064 protein-coding genes, 122 RNA genes (94 tRNA, 22 rRNA and 6 ncRNA genes), and 100 pseudogenes, with an average G+C content of 50.56%. In addition, we identified 8 prophage regions comprising 5 intact, 2 incomplete and 1 questionable ones and 63 genomic islands, suggesting the possibility of horizontal gene transfer in this strain. Comparative genome analysis of UPEC 26-1 with the UPEC strain CFT073 revealed an average nucleotide identity of 99.7%. The genome comparison with CFT073 provides major differences in the genome of UPEC 26-1 that would explain its increased virulence and biofilm formation. Nineteen of the total GIs were unique to UPEC 26-1 compared to CFT073 and nine of them harbored unique genes that are involved in virulence, multidrug resistance, biofilm formation and bacterial pathogenesis. The data from this study will assist in future studies of UPEC strains to develop effective control measures.
KeywordsUPEC UTI Genome annotation Genome sequencing Genomic islands Pathogenic genes
This work was supported by research fund of Chungnam National University (2015). Also, it was supported by Chungnam National University Hospital Research Fund, 2013.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
- Brenner DJ (1984) Family I. Enterobacteriaceae Rahn 1937, Nom. fam. cons. Opin. 15, Jud. Com. 1958, 73; Ewing, Farmer, and Brenner 1980, 674; Judicial Commission 1981, 104. In: Krieg NR, Holt JG (eds) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, 1st edn. The Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore, pp 408–420Google Scholar
- Escherich T (1886) Die Darmbakterien des Säuglings und ihre Beziehungen zur Physiologie der Verdauung. Ferdinand Enke, Stuttgart, pp 63–74Google Scholar
- Lee JH, Subhadra B, Son YJ, Kim DH, Park HS, Kim JM, Koo SH, Oh MH, Kim HJ, Choi CH (2016) Phylogenetic group distributions, virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance properties of uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from patients with urinary tract infections in South Korea. Lett Appl Microbiol 62:84–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scheutz F, Strockbine NA (2005) Genus I. Escherichia Castellani and Chalmers 1919. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. Springer, New York, pp 607–624Google Scholar
- Vila J, Pal T (2010) Update on antibacterial resistance in low-income countries: factors favoring the emergence of resistance. Open Infect Dis J 4:38–54Google Scholar
- Welch RA (2005) 3.3.3 The genus Escherichia. In: Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer K-H, Stackebrandt E (eds) The prokaryotes, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 62–71Google Scholar
- Welch RA, Burland V, Plunkett G 3rd, Redford P, Roesch P, Rasko D, Buckles EL, Liou SR, Boutin A, Hackett J et al (2002) Extensive mosaic structure revealed by the complete genome sequence of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:17020–17024CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar