The Nucleus

, Volume 61, Issue 1, pp 29–34 | Cite as

Characterization of Tulbaghia violacea (Tulbaghieae, Allioideae, Amaryllidaceae) from India: a cytogenetic and molecular approach

  • Abhishek Sadhu
  • Sreetama Bhadra
  • Maumita Bandyopadhyay
Original Article


Tulbaghia violacea, called ‘wild garlic’, is a native of Africa, though it is widely cultivated all over the world for its medicinal and horticultural importance. Absence of the genus from Indian floras and taxonomic surveys, as well as lack of proper molecular and cytogenetic characterizations, have instigated questions regarding origin and divergence of the Indian counterpart from its African relatives. In the present study, morphotaxonomical identification of Indian T. violacea was carried out, along with its karyomorphological characterization, 2C nuclear genome content determination, and analysis of ITS sequence. Mitotic study revealed that this species possessed 2n = 2x = 12 somatic chromosomes, two of which had secondary constrictions, whereas unstable meiotic chromosomal behavior was observed in flower buds, as reported earlier. 2C nuclear DNA content of T. violacea (44.51 ± 0.06 pg) was reported for the first time using flow cytometry, as was the ITS sequence data, from India.


Tulbaghia violacea Chromosome DNA content Internal transcribed spacer 



Authors acknowledge the Young Scientist Project, Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, for financial assistance. Dr. Jaroslav Doležel (Laboratory of Molecular Cytogenetics and Cytometry, Institute of Experimental Botany, Czech Republic) is acknowledged for his kind contribution with flow cytometry standard plant seeds. The Director, Centre for Research in Nanoscience & Nanotechnology (CRNN), University of Calcutta is acknowledged for providing BD FACSVerse™ Flow Cytometer instrument used in this study.


  1. 1.
    Angiosperm Phylogeny Group [APG III]. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot J Linn Soc. 2009;161:105–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benham S. Tulbaghia: a survey of the species in cultivation. Plantsman. 1993;15:89–110.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bennett MD. Nuclear DNA content and minimum generation time in herbaceous plants. Proc R Soc Lond (Biol). 1972;181:109–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blattner FR. Direct amplification of the entire ITS region from poorly preserved plant material using recombinant PCR. Biotechniques. 1999;27:1180–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burbidge RB. Cytotaxonomic studies in the genus Tulbaghia. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; 1970.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Doležel J, Sgorbati S, Lucretti S. Comparison of three DNA fluorochromes for flow cytometric estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants. Physiol Plant. 1992;85:625–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Doležel J, Bartoš J. Plant DNA flow cytometry and estimation of nuclear genome size. Ann Bot. 1995;95:99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Doležel J, Bartoš J, Voglmayr H, Greilhuber J. Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human. Cytometry. 2003;51:127–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Doyle J, Doyle JL. Genomic plant DNA preparation from fresh tissue—CTAB method. Phytochem Bull. 1987;19:11–5.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dutta M, Bandyopadhyay M. Karyomorphological study and report of B chromosome in Allium griffithianum Boiss. from India. Nucleus. 2014;57:209–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Greilhuber J. ‘Self-tanning’—a new and important source of stoichiometric error in cytophotometric determination of nuclear DNA content in plants. Plant Syst Evol. 1988;158:87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harvey WH. Tulbaghia violacea. Violet-flowered Tulbaghia. Bot Mag. 1837;64:t.3555.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huang X, Madan A. CAP3: a DNA sequence assembly program. Genome Res. 1999;9:868–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15. Accessed 10 Jul 2016.
  16. 16.
    Ingle J, Timmis JN, Sinclair J. Relationship between satellite deoxyribonucleic acid, ribosomal ribonucleic acid gene redundancy, and genome size in plants. Plant Physiol. 1975;55:496–501.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lakshmi N. Spontaneous chromosome breakage and inversion heterozygosity in a clone of Tulbaghia violacea Harv. Cytologia. 1988;53:157–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lyantagaye SL. Ethnopharmacological and phytochemical review of Allium species (sweet garlic) and Tulbaghia species (wild garlic) from Southern Africa. Tanzan J Sci. 2011;37:58–72.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mookerjea A. Cytology of Amaryllids as an aid to the understanding of evolution. Caryologia. 1955;7:1–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sadhu A, Bhadra S, Bandyopadhyay M. Novel nuclei isolation buffer for flow cytometric genome size estimation of Zingiberaceae: a comparison with common isolation buffers. Ann Bot. 2016;118:1057–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stafford GI, Wikkelsø MJ, Nancke L, Jäger AK, Möller M, Rønsted N. The first phylogenetic hypothesis for the Southern African endemic genus Tulbaghia (Amaryllidaceae, Allioideae) based on plastid and nuclear DNA sequences. Bot J Linn Soc. 2016;181:156–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vosa CG. A revised cytotaxonomy of the genus Tulbaghia. Caryologia. 2000;53:83–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Archana Sharma Foundation of Calcutta 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abhishek Sadhu
    • 1
  • Sreetama Bhadra
    • 1
  • Maumita Bandyopadhyay
    • 1
  1. 1.Plant Molecular Cytogenetics Laboratory, Centre of Advanced Study, Department of BotanyUniversity of CalcuttaKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations