Dynamic Games and Applications

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 379–400 | Cite as

Stochastic Differential Games for Which the Open-Loop Equilibrium is Subgame Perfect

  • Ricardo Josa-Fombellida
  • Juan Pablo Rincón-Zapatero


It is generally admitted that a correct forecasting of uncertain variables needs Markov decision rules. In a dynamic game environment, this belief is reinforced if one focuses on credible actions of the players. Usually, subgame perfectness requires equilibrium strategies to be constructed on Markov rules. It comes as a surprise that there are interesting classes of stochastic differential games where the equilibrium based on open-loop strategies is subgame perfect. This fact is well known for deterministic games. We explore here the stochastic case, not dealt with up to now, identifying different game structures leading to the subgame perfectness of the open-loop equilibrium.


Stochastic differential game Open-loop strategies Feedback strategies Markov Perfect Nash Equilibrium 

Mathematics Subject Classification

49N70 49N90 91A23 



We gratefully acknowledge the constructive comments of two anonymous referees and the associate editor. Support from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Spain), grants ECO 2014-56384-P, MDM 2014-0431, and Comunidad de Madrid, MadEco-CM S2015/HUM-3444 is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. 1.
    Başar T, Olsder GJ (1999) Dynamic noncooperative game theory. Classics in applied mathematics. SIAM, PhiladelphiazbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clemhout S, Wan HY Jr (1974) A class of trilinear differential games. J Optim Theory Appl 14(4):419–424MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dockner E, Feichtinger G, Jørgensen S (1985) Tractable classes of nonzero-sum open-loop Nash differential games: theory and examples. J Optim Theory Appl 45(2):179–197MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dockner EJ, Jørgensen S, Van Long N, Sorger G (2000) Differential games in economics and management science. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fershtman C (1987) Identification of classes of differential games for which the open loop is a degenerate feedback nash equilibrium. J Optim Theory Appl 55(2):217–231MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fershtman C (1989) Fixed rules and decision rules: time consistency and subgame perfection. Econ Lett 30(3):191–194MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fleming WH, Rishel RW (1975) Deterministic and stochastic optimal control. Springer, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jørgensen S (1985) An exponential differential game which admits a simple Nash solution. J Optim Theory Appl 45(3):383–396MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jørgensen S, Martín-Herrán G, Zaccour G (2003) Agreeability and time consistency in linear-state differential games. J Optim Theory Appl 119(1):49–63MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jørgensen S, Martín-Herrán G, Zaccour G (2010) The Leitmann–Schmitendorf advertising differential game. Appl Math Comput 217(3):1110–1116MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kamien MI, Schwartz NL (1991) Dynamic optimization: the calculus of variations and optimal control in economics and management, 2nd edn. North-Holland, AmsterdamzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mehlmann A (1988) Applied differential games. Plenum Press, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reinganum JF (1981) Dynamic games of innovation. J Econ Theory 25(1):21–41MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reinganum JF, Stokey N (1985) Oligopoly extraction of a common property natural resource: the importance of the period of commitment in dynamic games. Int Econ Rev 26(1):161–173MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yeung DWK (2001) Infinite-horizon stochastic differential games with branching payoffs. J Optim Theory Appl 111(2):445–460MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa and IMUVAUniversidad de ValladolidValladolidSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de EconomíaUniversidad Carlos III de MadridGetafeSpain

Personalised recommendations