KI - Künstliche Intelligenz

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 185–191 | Cite as

An Interactive Narrative Format for Clinical Guidelines

  • Marc Cavazza
  • Fred Charles
  • Alan Lindsay
  • Jonathan Siddle
  • Gersende Georg
Research Project

Abstract

Clinical guidelines are standardised documents, which summarise best practice in complex medical situations. Their target audience comprises health professionals, or in some cases patient groups, for whom they constitute important sources of patient education. These documents are characterised by a rich knowledge content, which also relies on a complex, largely implicit background. At the heart of guidelines is a set of recommendations describing expected behaviour throughout specific, evolving contexts. Such complex documents can be challenging to assimilate, in particular their patient education versions. The need to contextualise information and visualise behaviours and their consequences suggests the use of virtual environments, as in serious gaming. However, knowledge representation in serious games are often limited and the overall implementation mainly empirical. On the other hand, interactive narratives technologies have demonstrated their ability to embed complex behavioural knowledge and support principled behaviour responding to dynamic contexts. This is why they support the exploration of complex situations, their rehearsal, and the understanding of expected behaviour through what-if interaction. The narrative perspective also provides better user guidance than a pure simulation system, allowing mixed-initiative access to information. The translation of medical protocols as interactive narratives is faced with a number of knowledge representation challenges, in particular for the representation of non-compli-ance and the consequences of incorrect behaviour. Another technical issue is the need to represent both common sense and domain knowledge, and articulate their representation with the Planning domain that forms the backbone of the interactive narrative. As part of the Open FET project MUSE (FP7-296703), we are developing a proof-of-concept prototype exploring the above aspects, and embedding the logical structure of guidelines into a real-time interactive narrative, which provides a principled simulation of the situations faced by patients, which preserves causal and deontic constraints. This paper describes the knowledge engineering process supporting the development of this prototype, from the analysis of patient guidelines to the use of planning representations supporting the interactive narrative.

Keywords

Interactive narratives Natural language processing Patient education 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been funded in part through the Open FET MUSE project (FP7-296703). The contents of this paper only reflect the authors opinions and not necessarily the official position of Haute Autorité de Santé.

References

  1. 1.
    Alvarez N, Sanchez-Ruiz A, Cavazza M, Shigematsu M, Prendinger H (2014) Narrative balance management in an intelligent biosafety training application for improving user performance. Int J Artif Intel Educ pp 1–25Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aylett R, Vala M, Sequeira P, Paiva A (2007) FearNot!-an emergent narrative approach to virtual dramas for anti-bullying education. In: Virtual Storytelling. Using Virtual Reality Technologies for Storytelling, pp 202–205. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bradbrook K, Winstanley G, Glasspool D, Fox J, Griffiths R (2005) AI planning technology as a component of computerised clinical practice guidelines. In: Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, pp 171–180. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cavazza M, Charles F (2013) Towards interactive narrative medicine. In: Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 20: NextMed/MMVR20 184, pp 59–65Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cavazza M, Charles F, Mead S (2002) Character-based interactive storytelling. Intel Syst 17(4):17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Charon R (2001) The patient-physician relationship, narrative medicine: a model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust. JAMA 286(15):1897–1902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Christian D, Young M (2004) Comparing cognitive and computational models of narrative structure. In: Ferguson G, McGuinness D (eds.) Proceedings of 19th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2004), pp 385–390. San Jose, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ellaway RH, Topps D (2009) Rethinking fidelity, cognition and strategy: Medical simulation as gaming narratives. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 17: NextMed: Design For/the Well Being 142, p 82Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Georg G, Cavazza M (2007) Integrating document-based and knowledge-based models for clinical guidelines analysis. In: Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, pp 421–430. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Georg G, Jaulent MC (2007) A document engineering environment for clinical guidelines. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM symposium on Document engineering, pp 69–78. ACMGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gerevini A, Long, D (2005) Plan constraints and preferences in PDDL3. The Language of the Fifth International Planning Competition. Tech. Rep. Technical Report, Department of Electronics for Automation, University of Brescia, Italy 75Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Graesser AC, Franklin SP (1990) QUEST: A cognitive model of question answering. Discourse Process 13(3):279–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Graesser AC, Hemphill D (1991) Question answering in the context of scientific mechanisms. J Memory Lang 30(2):186–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lok B, Ferdig RE, Raij A, Johnsen K, Dickerson R, Coutts J, Stevens A, Lind DS (2006) Applying virtual reality in medical communication education: current findings and potential teaching and learning benefits of immersive virtual patients. Virtual Real 10(3–4):185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marsella SC, Johnson WL, LaBore C (2000) Interactive pedagogical drama. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Autonomous agents, pp 301–308. ACMGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Porteous J, Cavazza M, Charles F (2010) Applying planning to interactive storytelling: Narrative control using state constraints. ACM Trans Intel Syst Technol (TIST) 1(2):10Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Safeer RS, Keenan J (2005) Health literacy: the gap between physicians and patients. Am Fam Phys 72(3):463–468Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Si M, Marsella S, Miller L (2010) Interactive stories for health interventions. In: Interactive Storytelling, pp 291–292. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Swartout WR, Gratch J, Hill RW Jr, Hovy E, Marsella S, Rickel J, Traum D et al (2006) Toward virtual humans. AI Mag 27(2):96Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yin L, Montfort N, Bickmore T (2013) Using interactive narrative in health interventions: a drama manager approach. In: Ninth Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment ConferenceGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc Cavazza
    • 1
  • Fred Charles
    • 1
  • Alan Lindsay
    • 1
  • Jonathan Siddle
    • 1
  • Gersende Georg
    • 2
  1. 1.School of ComputingTeesside UniversityMiddlesbroughUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Haute Autorité de SantéSaint-Denis La Plaine CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations