Advertisement

Annals of Microbiology

, Volume 68, Issue 4, pp 217–228 | Cite as

Al3+ and Fe2+ toxicity reduction potential by acid-resistant strains of Rhodopseudomonas palustris isolated from acid sulfate soils under acidic conditions

  • Khuong Quoc Nguyen
  • Duangporn Kantachote
  • Jumpen Onthong
  • Ampaitip Sukhoom
Original Article

Abstract

This research aimed to evaluate the capacity of acid-resistant purple nonsulfur bacteria, Rhodopseudomonas palustris strains VNW02, TLS06, VNW64, and VNS89, to resist Al3+ and Fe2+ and to investigate their potential to remove both metals from aqueous solutions using exopolymeric substances (EPS) and biomasses. Based on median inhibition concentration (IC50), strain VNW64 was the most resistant to both metals under conditions of aerobic dark and microaerobic light; however, strain TLS06 was more resistant to Al3+ under aerobic dark conditions. High metal concentrations resulted in an altered cellular morphology, particularly for strain TLS06. Metal accumulation in all tested PNSB under both incubating conditions as individual Al3+ or Fe2+ was in the order of cell wall > cytoplasm > cell membrane. This was also found in a mixed metal set only under conditions of aerobic dark as microaerobic light was in the degree of cytoplasm > cell wall > cell membrane. Of all strains tested, EPS from strain VNW64 had the lowest carbohydrate and the highest protein contents. Metal biosorption under both incubating conditions, EPS produced by strains VNW64 and TLS06, achieved greater removal (80 mg Al3+ L−1 and/or 300 mg Fe2+ L−1) than their biomasses. Additionally, strain VNW64 had a higher removal efficiency compared to strain TLS06. Based on the alteration in cellular morphology, including biosorption and bioaccumulation mechanisms, R. palustris strains VNW64 and TLS06 demonstrated their resistance to metal toxicity. Hence, they may have great potential for ameliorating the toxicity of Al3+ and Fe2+ in acid sulfate soils for rice cultivation.

Keywords

Bioaccumulation Biopolymer Bioremediation Biosorption Paddy field Purple nonsulfur bacteria 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author was totally supported by the Graduate School, Prince of Songkla University from Thailand’s Education Hub for Southern Region of ASEAN Countries (TEH-AC), grant number TEH-AC 027/2015 that made possible this study.

References

  1. Aguilera A, Souza-Egipsy V, San Martín-Úriz P, Amils R (2008) Extraction of extracellular polymeric substances from extreme acidic microbial biofilms. Appl Microbiol Biot 78(6):1079–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Attanandana T, Vacharotayan S (1986) Acid sulfate soils: their characteristics, genesis, amelioration and utilization. Southeast Asian Stud 24:155–180Google Scholar
  3. Auger C, Han S, Appanna VP, Thomas SC, Ulibarri G, Appanna VD (2013) Metabolic reengineering invoked by microbial systems to decontaminate aluminum: implications for bioremediation technologies. Biotechnol Adv 31:266–273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boeris PS, Agustín MR, Acevedo DF, Lucchesi GI (2016) Biosorption of aluminum through the use of non-viable biomass of Pseudomonas putida. J Biotechnol 236:57–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bose A, Newman DK (2011) Regulation of the phototrophic iron oxidation (pio) genes in Rhodopseudomonas palustris TIE-1 is mediated by the global regulator, Fix K. Mol Microbiol 79(1):63–75CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Choudhury BU, Malang A, Webster R, Mohapatra KP, Verma BC, Kumar M, Das A, Islam N, Hazarika S (2017) Acid drainage from coal mining: effect on paddy soil and productivity of rice. Sci Total Environ 583:344–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. DuBois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PT, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28(3):350–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eboigbodin KE, Biggs CA (2008) Characterization of the extracellular polymeric substances produced by Escherichia coli using infrared spectroscopic, proteomic, and aggregation studies. Biomacromolecules 9(2):686–695CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Engel A, Piontek J, Grossart HP, Riebesell ULF, Schulz KG, Sperling M (2014) Impact of CO2 enrichment on organic matter dynamics during nutrient induced coastal phytoplankton blooms. J Plankton Res 36(3):641–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fernández-Dávila ML, Razo-Estrada AC, García-Medina S, Gómez-Oliván LM, Piñón-López MJ, Ibarra RG, Galar-Martínez M (2012) Aluminum-induced oxidative stress and neurotoxicity in grass carp (Cyprinidae—Ctenopharingodon idella). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 76:87–92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferreira ML, Casabuono AC, Stacchiotti ST, Couto AS, Ramirez SA, Vullo DL (2016) Chemical characterization of Pseudomonas veronii 2E soluble exopolymer as Cd (II) ligand for the biotreatment of electroplating wastes. Int Biodeter Biodegr 119:605–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gautam RK, Mudhoo A, Lofrano G, Chattopadhyaya MC (2014) Biomass-derived biosorbents for metal ions sequestration: adsorbent modification and activation methods and adsorbent regeneration. J Environ Chem Eng 2:239–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goyal N, Jain SC, Banerjee UC (2003) Comparative studies on the microbial adsorption of heavy metals. Adv Environ Res 7:311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hou W, Ma Z, Sun L, Han M, Lu J, Li Z, Mohamad OA, Wei G (2013) Extracellular polymeric substances from copper-tolerance Sinorhizobium meliloti immobilize Cu2+. J Hazard Mater 261:614–620CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ilamathi R, Nirmala GS, Muruganandam L (2014) Heavy metals biosorption in liquid solid fluidized bed by immobilized consortia in alginate beads. Int J Chem Tech Res 6:652–662Google Scholar
  16. Johnson JL (1981) In: Gerhardt P, RGE M, Costilow RN, Nester EW, Wood WA, Krieg NR, Phillips GB (eds) Manual of methods for general bacteriology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC 20006, p 456Google Scholar
  17. Jones AM, Xue Y, Kinsela AS, Wilcken KM, Collins RN (2016) Donnan membrane speciation of Al, Fe, trace metals and REEs in coastal lowland acid sulfate soil-impacted drainage waters. Sci Total Environ 547:104–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kantachote D, Nunkaew T, Kantha T, Chaiprapat S (2016) Biofertilizers from Rhodopseudomonas palustris strains to enhance rice yields and reduce methane emissions. Appl Soil Ecol 100:154–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khuong NQ, Kantachote D, Onthong J, Sukhoom A (2017) The potential of acid-resistant purple nonsulfur bacteria isolated from acid sulfate soils for reducing toxicity of Al3+ and Fe2+ using biosorption for agricultural application. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 12:329–340Google Scholar
  20. Lee HS, Suh JH, Kim IB, Yoon T (2004) Effect of aluminum in two-metal biosorption by an algal biosorbent. Miner Eng 17(4):487–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liang X, He CQ, Ni G, Tang GE, Chen XP, Lei YR (2014) Growth and Cd accumulation of Orychophragmus violaceus as affected by inoculation of Cd-tolerant bacterial strains. Pedosphere 24:322–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McLachlan DRC (1995) Aluminium and the risk for Alzheimer’s disease. Environmentrics 6:233–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mikutta R, Zang U, Chorover J, Haumaier L, Kalbitz K (2011) Stabilization of extracellular polymeric substances (Bacillus subtilis) by adsorption to and coprecipitation with Al forms. Geochim Cosmochim Ac 75(11):3135–3154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. More TT, Yadav JSS, Yan S, Tyagi RD, Surampalli RY (2014) Extracellular polymeric substances of bacteria and their potential environmental applications. J Environ Manag 144:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Neumann G, Veeranagouda Y, Karegoudar TB, Sahin Ö, Mäusezahl I, Kabelitz N, Kappelmeyer U, Heipieper H (2005) Cells of Pseudomonas putida and Enterobacter sp. adapt to toxic organic compounds by increasing their size. Extremophiles 9(2):163–168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Nookongbut P, Kantachote D, Megharaj M (2016) Arsenic contamination in areas surrounding mines and selection of potential As-resistant purple nonsulfur bacteria for use in bioremediation based on their detoxification mechanisms. Ann Microbiol 66(4):1419–1429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nunkaew T, Kantachote D, Nitoda T, Kanzaki H, Ritchie RJ (2015) Characterization of exopolymeric substances from selected Rhodopseudomonas palustris strains and their ability to adsorb sodium ions. Carbohyd Polym 115:334–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ortega-Retuerta E, Passow U, Duarte CM, Reche I (2009) Effects of ultraviolet B radiation on (not so) transparent exopolymer particles. Biogeosciences 6(12):3071–3080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ozdemir G, Baysal SH (2004) Chromium and aluminum biosorption on Chryseomonas luteola TEM05. Appl Microbiol Biot 64(4):599–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Panhwar QA, Naher UA, Shamshuddin J, Radziah O, Hakeem KR (2016) Management of acid sulfate soils for sustainable rice cultivation in Malaysia. In: Hakeem K, Akhtar J, Sabir M (eds) Soil science: agricultural and environmental prospectives. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 91–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Panwichian S, Kantachote D, Wittayaweerasak B, Mallavarapu M (2011) Removal of heavy metals by exopolymeric substances produced by resistant purple nonsulfur bacteria isolated from contaminated shrimp ponds. Electron J Biotechnol 14(4):2–2Google Scholar
  32. Ruan X, Li L, Liu J (2013) Flocculating characteristic of activated sludge flocs: interaction between Al3+ and extracellular polymeric substances. J Environ Sci 25(5):916–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Samaranayake P, Peiris BD, Dssanayake S (2012) Effect of excessive ferrous (Fe2+) on growth and iron content in rice (Oryza sativa). Int J Agric Biol 14:296–298Google Scholar
  34. Sheng GP, Yu HQ, Yue ZB (2005) Production of extracellular polymeric substances from Rhodopseudomonas acidophila in the presence of toxic substances. Appl Microbiol Biot 69(2):216–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith PK, Krohn RI, Hermanson GT, Mallia AK, Gartner FH, Provenzano MD, Fujimoto EK, Goeke NM, Olson BJ, Klenk DC (1985) Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal Biochem 150(1):76–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Soltanpour PN, Johnson GW, Workman SM, Jones JB, Miller RO (1996) Inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. In: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3—chemical methods. SSSA Book Ser. 5.3. SSSA, ASA, Madison, WI. doi: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3. Pp 91-139
  37. Swanner ED, Bayer T, Wu W, Hao L, Obst M, Sundman A, Byrne JM, Michel FM, Kleinhanns IC, Kappler A, Schoenberg R (2017) Iron isotope fractionation during Fe (II) oxidation mediated by the oxygen-producing marine cyanobacterium Synechococcus PCC 7002. Environ Sci Technol 51(9):4897–4906CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Tapia JM, Muñoz J, González F, Blázquez ML, Ballester A (2013) Sorption of ferrous and ferric iron by extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) from acidophilic bacteria. Prep Biochem Biotech 43(8):815–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tapia JM, Muñoz J, González F, Blázquez ML, Ballester A (2016) Sorption of ferrous iron by EPS from the acidophilic bacterium Acidiphilium sp.: a mechanism proposal. Rev Metal Madrid 52(3):e076.  https://doi.org/10.3989/revmetalm.076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tóth G, Hermann T, Da Silva MR, Montanarella L (2016) Heavy metals in agricultural soils of the European Union with implications for food safety. Environ Int 88:299–309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang J, Chen C (2006) Biosorption of heavy metals by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a review. Biotechnol Adv 24(5):427–451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang K, Garg S, Waite TD (2017) Light-mediated reactive oxygen species generation and iron redox transformations in the presence of exudate from the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa. Environ Sci Technol 51(15):8384–8395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Wingender J, Neu TR, Flemming HC (1999) Microbial extracellular polymeric substances. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wurl O, Miller L, Vagle S (2011) Production and fate of transparent exopolymer particles in the ocean. J Geophys Res 116(C7):C00H13Google Scholar
  45. Xuan W, Bin Z, Zhiqiang S, Zhigang Q, Zhaoli C, Min J, Junwen L, Jingfeng W (2010) The EPS characteristics of sludge in an aerobic granule membrane bioreactor. Bioresour Technol 101(21):8046–8050CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Yuan DQ, Wang YY (2013) Effects of solution conditions on the physicochemical properties of stratification components of extracellular polymeric substances in anaerobic digested sludge. J Environ Sci 25(1):155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature and the University of Milan 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Khuong Quoc Nguyen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Duangporn Kantachote
    • 1
    • 3
  • Jumpen Onthong
    • 4
  • Ampaitip Sukhoom
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Microbiology, Faculty of SciencePrince of Songkla UniversityHat YaiThailand
  2. 2.Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture and Applied BiologyCan Tho UniversityCan ThoViet Nam
  3. 3.Center of Excellence on Hazardous Substance ManagementBangkokThailand
  4. 4.Department of Earth Science, Faculty of Natural ResourcesPrince of Songkla UniversityHat YaiThailand

Personalised recommendations