Advertisement

3 Biotech

, 8:171 | Cite as

Microbial functional diversity plays an important role in the degradation of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) in soil

  • Samrat Dey
  • Prosun Tribedi
Original Article
  • 79 Downloads

Abstract

Towards bioremediation of recalcitrant materials like synthetic polymer, soil has been recognized as a traditional site for disposal and subsequent degradation as some microorganisms in soil can degrade the polymer in a non-toxic, cost-effective, and environment friendly way. Microbial functional diversity is a constituent of biodiversity that includes wide range of metabolic activities that can influence numerous aspects of ecosystem functioning like ecosystem stability, nutrient availability, ecosystem dynamics, etc. Thus, in the current study, we assumed that microbial functional diversity could play an important role in polymer degradation in soil. To verify this hypothesis, we isolated soil from five different sites of landfill and examined several microbiological parameters wherein we observed a significant variation in heterotrophic microbial count as well as microbial activities among the soil microcosms tested. Multivariate analysis (principle component analysis) based on the carbon sources utilization pattern revealed that soil microcosms showed different metabolic patterns suggesting the variable distribution of microorganisms among the soil microcosms tested. Since microbial functional diversity depends on both microbial richness and evenness, Shannon diversity index was determined to measure microbial richness and Gini coefficient was determined to measure microbial evenness. The tested soil microcosms exhibited variation in both microbial richness and evenness suggesting the considerable difference in microbial functional diversity among the tested microcosms. We then measured polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) degradation in soil microcosms after desired period of incubation of PHB in soil wherein we found that soil microcosms having higher functional diversity showed enhanced PHB degradation and soil microcosms having lower functional diversity showed reduced PHB degradation. We also noticed that all the tested soil microcosms showed similar pattern in both microbial functional diversity and PHB degradation suggesting a strong positive correlation (r = 0.95) between microbial functional diversity and PHB degradation. Thus, the results demonstrate that microbial functional diversity plays an important role in PHB degradation in soil by exhibiting versatile microbial metabolic potentials that lead to the enhanced degradation of PHB.

Keywords

PHB Bioremediation Microbial functional diversity Positive correlation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Subhasis Sarkar for critical reading of the manuscript. This current work was not supported by any funding.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adam G, Duncan H (2001) Development of a sensitive and rapid method for the measurement of total microbial activity using fluorescein diacetate (FDA) in a range of soils. Soil Biol Biochem 33:943–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altaee N, El-Hiti GA, Fahdil A, Sudesh K, Yousif E (2016) Biodegradation of different formulations of polyhydroxybutyrate films in soil. Springerplus 5(1):762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balasubramanian V, Natarajan K, Hemambika B, Ramesh N, Sumathi CS, Kottaimuthu R, Rajesh Kannan V (2010) High density polyethylene (HDPE) degrading potential bacteria from marine ecosystem of Gulf of Mannar, India. Lett Appl Microbiol 51:205–211Google Scholar
  4. Chen M, Xu P, Zeng G, Yang C, Huang D, Zhang J (2015) Bioremediation of soils contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, petroleum, pesticides, chlorophenols and heavy metals by composting: applications, microbes and future research needs. Biotechnol Adv 33(6):745–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen M, Zeng G, Lai C, Zhang C, Xu P, Yan M, Xiong W (2017) Interactions of carbon nanotubes and/or graphene with manganese peroxidase during biodegradation of endocrine disruptors and triclosan. Chemosphere 184:127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi KH, Dobbs FC (1999) Comparison of two kinds of BiOLOG microplates (GN and ECO) in their ability to distinguish among aquatic microbial communities. J Microbiol Methods 36:203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diaz S, Cabido M (2001) Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol Evol 16:646–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doi Y, Fukuda K (2014) Biodegradable plastics and polymers. In: Proceedings of the third international workshop on biodegradable plastics and polymers. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  9. Galia MB (2010) Isolation and analysis of storage compounds. In: Timmis KN (ed) Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology. Springer, Berlin, pp 3725–3741Google Scholar
  10. Goswami M, Bhattacharyya P, Mukherjee I, Tribedi P (2017) Functional diversity: an important measure of ecosystem functioning. Adv Microbiol 7:82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Green VS, Stottb DE, Diacka M (2006) Assay for fluorescein diacetate hydrolytic activity: optimization for soil samples. Soil Biol Biochem 38:693–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harshvardhan K, Jha B (2013) Biodegradation of low-density polyethylene by marine bacteria from pelagic waters, Arabian Sea, India. Mar Pollut Bull 77:100–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang DL, Guang-Ming Z, Chong-Ling F, Shuang H, Xiao-Yun J, Lin T, Feng-Feng S, Yu Z, Wei Z, Liu Hong-Lang (2008) Degradation of lead-contaminated lignocellulosic waste by Phanerochaete chrysosporium and the reduction of lead toxicity. Environ Sci Technol 42:4946–4951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kobayashi T, Uchino K, Abe T, Yamazaki Y, Saito T (2005) Novel intracellular 3-hydroxybutyrate-oligomer hydrolase in Wautersia eutropha H16. J Bacteriol 187:5129–5135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lauber CL, Hamady M, Knight R, Fierer N (2009) Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:5111–5120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu GH, Rajendran N, Amemiya T, Itoh K (2011) Bacterial community structure analysis of sediment in the Sagami River, Japan using a rapid approach based on two-dimensional DNA gel electrophoresis mapping with selective primer pairs. Environ Monit Assess 182:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marinari S, Bonifacio E, Moscatelli MC, Falsone G, Antisari LV, Vianello G (2013) Soil development and microbial functional diversity: proposal for a methodological approach. Geoderma 192:437–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nannipieri P, Ascher J, Ceccherini M, Landi L, Pietramellara G, Renella G (2003) Microbial diversity and soil functions. Eur J Soil Sci 54:655–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pietramellara J, Ascher MT, Ceccherini G, Renella G (2002) Soil as a biological system. Ann Microbiol 52:119–131Google Scholar
  20. Rawia F, Gamal M, Abdelhady A, Khodair S, El-Tayeb E, Khadiga A (2013) Semi-scale production of PHBs from waste frying oil by Pseudomonas fluorescens S48. Braz J Microbiol. 44:539–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sarkar S, Tribedi P, Gupta AD, Saha T, Sil AK (2017) Microbial functional diversity decreases with sewage purification in stabilization ponds. Waste Biomass Valoriz 8:417–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shah AA, Fariha H, Abdul H, Safia A (2008) Biological degradation of plastics: a comprehensive review. Biotechnol Adv 26:2467–2650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Silva IS, dosSantos E, deMenezes CR, deFaria AF, Franciscon E, Grossman M, Durrant LR (2009) Bioremediation of a polyaromatic hydrocarbon contaminated soil by native soil microbiota and bioaugmentation with isolated microbial consortia. Bioresour Technol 100:4669–4675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stotzky G (1997) Soil as an environment for microbial life. In: van Elsas JD, Trevors JT, Wellington EMH (eds) Modern soil microbiology. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  25. Tokiwa Y, Calabia BP, Ugwu CU, Aiba S (2009) Biodegradability of plastics. Int J Mol Sci 10:3722–3742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tribedi P, Sil AK (2013) Bioaugmentation of polyethylene succinate contaminated soil with Pseudomonas sp. AKS2 results in increased microbial activity and better polymer degradation. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 20:1318–1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tribedi P, Sarkar S, Mukherjee K, Sil AK (2012) Isolation of a novel Pseudomonas sp. from soil that can efficiently degrade polyethylene succinate. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:2115–2124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tribedi P, Gupta AD, Sil AK (2015) Adaptation of Pseudomonas sp. AKS2 in biofilm on low-density polyethylene surface: an effective strategy for efficient survival and polymer degradation. Bioresour Bioprocess 2:14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tyagi M, daFonseca MMR, deCarvalho CCCR (2011) Bioaugmentation and biostimulation strategies to improve the effectiveness of bioremediation processes. Biodegradation 22:231–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Venosa AD, Zhu X (2003) Biodegradation of crude oil contaminating marine shorelines and freshwater wetlands. Spill Sci Technol Bull 8:163–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Verlinden RA, Hill DJ, Kenward MA, Williams CD, Radecka I (2007) Bacterial synthesis of biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoates. J Appl Microbiol 102:1437–1449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang Y, Yin J, Chen GQ (2014) Polyhydroxyalkanoates, challenges and opportunities. Curr Opin Biotechnol 30:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yu Z, Guang-Ming Z, Yao-Ning C, Jia-Chao Z, Yong Yu HL, Zhi-Feng L, Lin T (2011) Effects of inoculation with Phanerochaete chrysosporium on remediation of pentachlorophenol-contaminated soil waste by composting. Process Biochem 46(6):1285–1291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zeng GM, Chen M, Zeng ZT (2013) Risks of nionicotinoid pesticides. Science 340:1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsAssam Don Bosco UniversityGuwahatiIndia
  2. 2.Department of MicrobiologyAssam Don Bosco UniversityGuwahatiIndia
  3. 3.Department of BiotechnologyThe Neotia UniversitySarisaIndia

Personalised recommendations