Abstract
The optimal or lowest energy configuration of two carbon nanotori is investigated. With the assumption that the tori are symmetrically situated and parallel with the centres lying on their common axis, the interaction energy between the two tori is evaluated using the continuum approximation and the Lennard-Jones potential function. This mathematical modelling approach provides a fast and accurate computation as compared to other simulation methods. The numerical results obtained determine the most stable configuration corresponding to the minimum energies for five different sized tori, and a relation between the major and minor radii of the tori and the equilibrium position is demonstrated. The interaction energies between two nanotori determined here might be utilised to model many promising devices for future developments in nano and biotechnology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baowan D, Hill JM (2007) Force distribution for double-walled carbon nanotubes. Z Angew Math Phys 58:857–875
Chan Y, Cox BJ, Hill JM (2012) Carbon nanotori as traps for atoms and ions. Physica B 407:3479–3483
Cox BJ, Hill JM (2007) New carbon molecules in the form of elbow-connected nanotori. J Phys Chem C 111:10855–10860
Dunlap BI (1992) Connecting carbon tubules. Phys Rev B 46:1933–1936
Hilder TA, Hill JM (2007) Orbiting atoms and \(\text{ C }_{60}\) fullerenes inside carbon nanotori. J Appl Phys 101:064319
Hilder TA, Hill JM (2007) Orbiting nanosectors inside carbon nanotori. Nano Lett 2:50–53
Hilder TA, Hill JM (2007) Oscillating carbon nanotori along carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B 75:125415
Lennard-Jones JE (1931) Cohesion. Proc Phys Soc 43:461–482
Latil S, Roche S, Rubio A (2003) Persistent currents in carbon nanotube based rings. Phys Rev B 67:165420
Liu CP, Xu N (2008) Magnetic response of chiral carbon nanotori: the dependence of torus radius. Physica B 403:2884–2887
Liu J, Dai H, Hafner JH, Colbert DT, Smalley RE (1997) Fullerene ‘crop circles’. Nature 385:780–781
Liu L, Liu F, Zhao J (2014) Curved carbon nanotubes: from unique geometries to novel properties and peculiar applications. Nano Res 7:626–657
Lusk MT, Hamm N (2007) Toroidal carbon nanotubes with encapsulated atomic metal loops. Phys Rev B 76:125422
Maitland GC, Rigby M, Smith EB, Wakeham WA (1981) Intermolecular forces: their origin and determination. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Martel R, Shea HR, Avouris P (1999) Ring formation in single-wall carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem B 103:7551–7556
Ohshima H, Hyono A (2009) The van der waals interaction between two torus-shaped colloidal particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 332:251–253
Saito R, Dresselhaus G, Dresselhaus MS (1998) Physical properties of carbon nanotubes. Imperial College Press, London
Sano M, Kamino A, Okamura J, Shinkai S (2001) Ring closure of carbon nanotubes. Science 293:1299–1301
Sarapat P, Baowan D, Hill JM (2018) Equilibrium location for spherical dna and toroidal cyclodextrin. Appl Nanosci 8:537–544
Sarapat P, Baowan D, Hill JM (2018) Interaction energy for a fullerene encapsulated in a carbon nanotorus. Z Angew Math Phys 69:77
Sarapat P, Thamwattana N, Baowan D (2016) Continuum modelling for adhesion between paint surfaces. Int J Adhes Adhes 70:234–238
Sumetpipat K, Lee RKF, Cox BJ, Hill JM, Baowan D (2014) Carbon nanotori and nanotubes encapsulating carbon atomic-chains. J Math Chem 52:1817–1830
Tang X (2011) Persistent current in a carbon nanotube torus encapsulated with a carbon ring. J Phys Condens Mater 23:105302
Yazgan E, Tasci E, Malcioglu OB, Erkoc S (2004) Electronic properties of carbon nanotoroidal structures. J Mol Struct Theochem 681:231–234
Zhang Z, Yuan J, Qiu M, Peng J, Xiao F (2006) Persistent currents in carbon nanotori: effects of structure deformations and chirality. J Appl Phys 99:104311
Acknowledgements
PS gratefully acknowledges the financial support from the Thailand Research Fund through the Royal Golden Jubilee PhD Program (Grant No. PHD/0075/2559), and DB is grateful for funding from the Thailand Research Fund (RSA6180076)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A: Derivation of energy expression between atom and torus
From (3) the integrand does not depend on \(\theta\), and the expression can be reduced to the form
where \(a=r^2+R^2+\delta ^2, b=-2r(R^2+\delta ^2)^{1/2}\) and \(\phi _0=\sin ^{-1}(R/(R^2+\delta ^2)^{1/2})\). Consequently, substituting \(\lambda =\phi -\phi _0\) gives
where \(\theta _0\) is a certain angle in \((-\pi ,\pi ]\). Therefore, we primarily focus on integrals of the form
Upon utilising the Legendre polynomials property, \(P_{-n}(x)=P_{n-1}(x)\), and the integral representation
we obtain
Finally, substituting the result back to (A1) gives
Appendix B: Derivation of energy expression between two tori
Now, we consider (4) and by rearranging \(\epsilon\), we have
where \(\omega _0=\sin ^{-1}(S/(S^2+\delta ^2)^{1/2})\). After substituting the new distance \(\epsilon\) into (3), it is observed that the integrand does not depend on \(\psi\), so that the energy integral for two tori becomes
where with \(\alpha =R^2+S^2+s^2+\delta ^2,\beta =\alpha -r^2,\gamma =\alpha +r^2,\kappa =2s(S^2+\delta ^2)^{1/2}\) and \({\tilde{I}}_m^\text {(tt)}\) for \(m=n-1\) and \(m = n-2\) are defined as
Making a substitution \(\mu =\omega +\omega _0\) and applying the angle addition formula for the cosine function provide
where \({\hat{I}}_j^\text {(tt)}\) for \(j=1\) and 2 are defined as
Upon converting the Legendre polynomial of the first kind into the series representation
and using the fact that the integrand is integrated over \(2\pi\) and is an even function, the equation above may be rewritten as
Adopting the trigonometric property, \(\cos \mu =1-2\sin ^2\mu /2\), and making a substitution \(t=\sin ^2\mu /2\) give
Subsequently, applying the binomial theorem to the term in the numerator and writing the result in terms of the Appell’s hypergeometric function using the integral representation
the equation above becomes
Next, we use the series form of the Appell’s function
and some properties of the Pochhammer symbol and gamma function, we may deduce
where F(a, b; c; x) is the ordinary hypergeometric function. Finally, substituting the result back into Eqs. (B2) and (B1), respectively, leads to the complete form of the energy expression for two tori interaction.
However, if we further assume that the major radius R is much larger than the minor radius r, the energy expression defined by (B3) can be rewritten as
Similarly, applying the properties of the Legendre polynomials as given in (A2) brings
Subsequently, following the same procedure as described previously by substituting it back into (B2) and (B1) to obtain the final expression for the interaction energy between two tori.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sarapat, P., Baowan, D. & Hill, J.M. Optimal configurations for interacting carbon nanotori. Appl Nanosci 9, 225–232 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-018-0930-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-018-0930-6