Prediction of cutting force by using ANFIS

  • Vineet Jain
  • Tilak Raj
Original Article


The aim of this research is to develop a model to predict the cutting forces of a turning operation. This paper focuses on to design a monitoring system that can recognize cutting force on the basis of cutting parameters like spindle speed, feed and depth of cut by using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). Cutting force is one of the important characteristic variables to be watched and controlled in the cutting processes to determine tool life and surface roughness of the work piece. The principal assumption was that the cutting forces increase due to the wearing of the tool. So, ANFIS model is used to express the cutting force signal. In this paper, ANFIS is used to predict the cutting force. The correlation coefficient (R) and average percentage error found in this modeling are 0.9976 and 2.59% respectively. The predicted cutting force values derived from ANFIS were compared with experimental data. The comparison indicates that the ANFIS achieved very satisfactory accuracy. The correlation coefficient (R) and average percentage error found in this modeling are 0.9976 and 2.59% respectively. The prediction accuracy of ANFIS reached is as high as 97%.


Cutting force Modelling Cutting force estimation ANFIS 



We would like to thank everyone that participated in this research work. We express our gratitude all the anonymous reviewers of this paper for their valuable suggestions, who have helped to improve the quality of this paper.


  1. Abouelatta O, Madl J (2001) Surface roughness prediction based on cutting parameters and tool vibrations in turning operations. J Mater Process Technol 118:269–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aengchuan P, Phruksaphanrat B (2015) Comparison of fuzzy inference system (FIS), FIS with artificial neural networks (FIS + ANN) and FIS with adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (FIS + ANFIS) for inventory control. J Intell Manuf. Google Scholar
  3. Azouzi R, Guillot M (1997) On-line prediction of surface finish and dimensional deviation in turning using neural network based sensor fusion. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 37:1201–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baseri H (2011) Design of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for estimation of grinding performance. Mater Manuf Processes 26:757–763. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chaudhary H, Panwar V, Prasad R, Sukavanam N (2016) Adaptive neuro fuzzy based hybrid force/position control for an industrial robot manipulator. J Intell Manuf 27:1299–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Childs T (2000) Metal machining: theory and applications. Butterworth-Heinemann, WalthamGoogle Scholar
  7. Cus F, Balic J (2003) Optimization of cutting process by GA approach. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 19:113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dixit US, Sarma D, Davim JP (2012) Environmentally friendly machining. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dong M, Wang N (2011) Adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system with leave-one-out cross-validation approach for prediction of surface roughness. Appl Math Model 35:1024–1035. CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. El Baradie M (1991) Computer aided analysis of a surface roughness model for turning. J Mater Process Technol 26:207–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. El Baradie M (1993) Surface roughness model for turning grey cast iron (154 BHN). Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 207:43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fang X, Jawahir I (1994) Predicting total machining performance in finish turning using integrated fuzzy-set models of the machinability parameters. Int J Prod Res 32:833–849CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Gajate A, Haber R, Del Toro R, Vega P, Bustillo A (2012) Tool wear monitoring using neuro-fuzzy techniques: a comparative study in a turning process. J Intell Manuf 23:869–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghani A, Choudhury I (2002) Study of tool life, surface roughness and vibration in machining nodular cast iron with ceramic tool. J Mater Process Technol 127:17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gorczyca FE (1987) Application of metal cutting theory. Industrial Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Ho W-H, Tsai J-T, Lin B-T, Chou J-H (2009) Adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system for prediction of surface roughness in end milling process using hybrid Taguchi-genetic learning algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 36:3216–3222. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Iqbal A, He N, Dar NU, Li L (2007a) Comparison of fuzzy expert system based strategies of offline and online estimation of flank wear in hard milling process. Expert Syst Appl 33:61–66. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iqbal A, He N, Li L, Dar NU (2007b) A fuzzy expert system for optimizing parameters and predicting performance measures in hard-milling process. Expert Syst Appl 32:1020–1027. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jain V, Raj T (2013) Ranking of flexibility in flexible manufacturing system by using a combined multiple attribute decision making method. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 14:125–141. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jain V, Raj T (2014) Modelling and analysis of FMS productivity variables by ISM, SEM and GTMA approach. Front Mech Eng 9:218–232. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jain V, Raj T (2015) Modeling and analysis of FMS flexibility factors by TISM and fuzzy MICMAC. Int J System Assur Eng Manag 6:350–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jain V, Raj T (2016) Modeling and analysis of FMS performance variables by ISM, SEM and GTMA approach. Int J Prod Econ 171:84–96. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jain V, Raj T (2017) Tool life management of unmanned production system based on surface roughness by ANFIS. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 8:458–467. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jang JS (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23:665–685. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kalpakjian S (2001) Manufacturing engineering and technology. Pearson Education, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumanan S, Jesuthanam C, Kumar RA (2008) Application of multiple regression and adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system for the prediction of surface roughness. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35:778–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lin W, Lee B, Wu C (2001) Modeling the surface roughness and cutting force for turning. J Mater Process Technol 108:286–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lo S-P (2002) The application of an ANFIS and grey system method in turning tool-failure detection. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 19:564–572. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maher I, Eltaib M, El-Zahry R (2006) Surface roughness prediction in end milling using multiple regression and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Paper presented at the International conference on mechanical engineering advanced technology for industrial production, Assiut University, EgyptGoogle Scholar
  30. Maher I, Eltaib M, Sarhan AA, El-Zahry R (2014) Investigation of the effect of machining parameters on the surface quality of machined brass (60/40) in CNC end milling—ANFIS modeling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74:531–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Maher I, Eltaib M, Sarhan AA, El-Zahry R (2015) Cutting force-based adaptive neuro-fuzzy approach for accurate surface roughness prediction in end milling operation for intelligent machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76:1459–1467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mital A, Mehta M (1988) Surface finish prediction models for fine turning. Int J Prod Res 26:1861–1876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ojha D, Dixit U (2005) An economic and reliable tool life estimation procedure for turning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26:726–732. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rizal M, Ghani JA, Nuawi MZ, Haron CHC (2013) Online tool wear prediction system in the turning process using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Appl Soft Comput 13:1960–1968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roy SS (2015) An application of ANFIS-based intelligence technique for predicting tool wear in milling. In: Mandal D. Kar R, Das S, Panigrahi B (eds) Advances in intelligent systems and computing 2015. Springer, New Delhi, pp 299–306.
  36. Samanta B (2009) Surface roughness prediction in machining using soft computing. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 22:257–266. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sarkheyli A, Zain AM, Sharif S (2015) A multi-performance prediction model based on ANFIS and new modified-GA for machining processes. J Intell Manuf 26:703–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shafaei R, Rabiee M, Mirzaeyan M (2011) An adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system for makespan estimation in multiprocessor no-wait two stage flow shop. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 24:888–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sharma VS, Sharma S, Sharma AK (2008) Cutting tool wear estimation for turning. J Intell Manuf 19:99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Svalina I, Simunovic G, Simunovic K (2013) Machined surface roughness prediction using adaptive neurofuzzy inference system. Appl Artif Intell 27:803–817. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vajpayee S (1981) Analytical study of surface roughness in turning. Wear 70:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Waters TF (2002) Fundamentals of manufacturing for engineers. CRC Press, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang JZ, Chen JC, Kirby ED (2007) The development of an in-process surface roughness adaptive control system in turning operations. J Intell Manuf 18:301–311. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Reliability Engineering, Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM), India and The Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringAmity University HaryanaGurgaonIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringYMCA University of Science and TechnologyFaridabadIndia

Personalised recommendations