Robotics Total Mesorectal Excision Up To the Minute


Surgical techniques have evolved over the past few decades, and minimally invasive surgery has been rapidly adapted to become a preferred operative approach for treating colorectal diseases. However, many of the procedures remain a technical challenge for surgeons to perform laparoscopically, which has prompted the development of robotic platforms. Robotic surgery has been introduced as the latest advance in minimally invasive surgery. The present article provides an overview of robotic rectal surgery and describes many advances that have been made in the field over the past two decades. More specifically, the introduction of the robotic platform and its benefits, and the limitations of current robotic technology, are discussed. Although the main advantages of robotic surgery over conventional laparoscopy appear to be lower conversion rates and better surgical specimen quality, oncological and functional outcomes appear to be similar to those of other alternatives. Other potential benefits include earlier recovery of voiding and sexual function after robotic total mesorectal excision. Nevertheless, the costs and lack of haptic feedback remain the primary limitations to the widespread use of robotic technology in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Data Availability

Upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Heald RJ (1988) The ‘Holy Plane’ of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med 81(9):503–508

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Somprakas B, Vivek SV, Shukla K (2009) Recent advances in the management of carcinoma of the rectum. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2:49–60

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    American Cancer Society (2020) Cancer Facts & Figures 2020. American Cancer Society, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, Lee ES (2018) Community of Population-Based Regional Cancer Registries. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2015. Cancer Res Treat 50:303–316

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Fowler DL, White SA (1991) Laparoscopy-assisted sigmoid resection. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1:183–188

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97(11):1638–1645

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E et al (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 2464:655–662 discussion 662–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lacy AM, Delgado S, Castells A, Prins HA, Arroyo V, Ibarzabal A, Pique JM (2008) The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg 248(1):1–7

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Liang JT, Huang KC, Lai HS, Lee PH, Jeng YM (2007) Oncologic results of laparoscopic versus conventional open surgery for stage II or III left-sided colon cancers: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg Oncol 14(1):109–117

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, Sargent D, Schroeder G, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group (2002) Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 2873:321–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne GH (2002) Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1689–1694 discussion 1695-1696

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH, Paz IB (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 20:1521–1525

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, Quirke P, West N, Rautio T, Thomassen N, Tilney H, Gudgeon M, Bianchi PP, Edlin R, Hulme C, Brown J (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318:1569–1580

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Baik SH, Kang CM, Lee WJ, Kim NK, Sohn SK, Chi HS, Cho CH (2007) Robotic total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. J Robotic Surg 1:99–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ng SS, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Li JC, Hon SS (2007) Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: report of the first case in Hong Kong and China with an updated literature review. World J Gastroenterol 13:2514–2518

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Baik SH, Ko YT, Kang CM, Lee WJ, Kim NK, Sohn SK, Chi HS, Cho CH (2008) Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial. Surg Endosc 22:1601–1608

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Spinoglio G, Summa M, Priora F, Quarati R, Testa S (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1627–1632

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Intuitive Surgical Investor Presentation. Q3 2017. Available from URL: Accessed 6 Sept 2017

  21. 21.

    Baik SK, Kwon HY, Kim JS, Hur H, Sohn SK, Cho CW et al (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16(6):1480–1487

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sng KK, Hara M, Shin JW, Yoo BE, Yang KS, Kim SH (2013) The multiphasic learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgery. Surg Endosc 27:3297–3307

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH (2011) A comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 25:240–248

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lujan J, Gonzalez A, Abrisqueta J, Hernandez Q, Valero G, Abellán I, Frutos MD, Parrilla P (2014) The learning curve of laparoscopic treatment of rectal cancer does not increase morbidity. Cir Esp 92:485–490

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Park IJ, Choi GS, Lim KH, Kang BM, Jun SH (2009) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 13:275–281

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kim VB, Chapman WH, Albrecht RJ, Bailey BM, Young JA, Nifong LW, Chitwood WR Jr (2002) Early experience with tele-manipulative robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy using da Vinci. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12:33–40

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Merola S, Weber P, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne GH (2002) Comparison of laparoscopic colectomy with and without the aid of a robotic camera holder. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 1:46–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Stylopoulos N, Rattner D (2003) Robotics and ergonomics. Surg Clin North Am 6:1321–1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Gomez G (2004) Sabiston Textbook of Surgery, 17th edn. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia Emerging Technology in surgery: informatics, electronics, robotics

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hubens G, Ruppert M, Balliu L, Vaneerdeweg W (2004) What have we learnt after two years working with the da Vinci robot system in digestive surgery? Acta Chir Belg 104:609–614

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Statement on robotic surgery by ACOG President James T. Breeden, MD. March 14, 2013

  33. 33.

    Hottenrott C (2011) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer and cost-effectiveness analysis. Surg Endosc 25:3954–3957

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Byrn JC, Hrabe JE, Charlton ME (2014) An initial experience with 85 consecutive robotic-assisted rectal dissections: Improved operating times and lower costs with experience. Surg Endosc 28:3101–3107

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Shiomi A, Kinugasa Y, Yamaguchi T, Kagawa H, Yamakawa Y (2016) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for lower rectal cancer: the impact of visceral obesity on surgical outcomes. Int J Color Dis 31:1701–1710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Scarpinata R, Aly EH (2013) Does robotic rectal cancer surgery offer improved early postoperative outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 56:253–262

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Li X, Wang T, Yao L, Hu L, Jin P, Guo T et al (2017) The safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic TME in patients with rectal cancer. A meta-analysis and systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore) 96:e7585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Pezzolla A, Prete F, Testini M, Marzaioli R, Patriti A et al (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 267:1034–1046

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Ng KT, Tsia Tsia AKV, Chong VYL (43, 2019) Robotic versus conventional laparoscopy surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. World J Surg:1146–1161

  40. 40.

    Kim YW, Lee HM, Kim NK, Min BS, Lee KY (2012) The learning curve for robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22(5):400–405

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Huang C-W, Tsa H-L, Yeh Y-S et al (2017) Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with the single-docking technique for patients with rectal cancer. BMC Surg 17:126.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Bianchi PP, Ceriani C, Locatelli A, Spinoglio G, Zampino MG, Sonzogni A, Crosta C, Andreoni B (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 24:2888–2894

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Allemann P, Duvoisin C, Di Mare L, Hübner M, Demartines N, Hahnloser D (2016) Robotic-assisted surgery improves the quality of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer compared to laparoscopy: results of a case-controlled analysis. World J Surg 40:1010–1016

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kim SH, Kwak JM (2013) Robotic total mesorectal excision: operative technique and review of the literature. Tech Coloproctol 17:S47–S53

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Baik SH (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery. Yonsei Med J 49:891–896

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Bianchi PP, Luca F, Petz W, Valvo M, Cenciarelli S, Zuccaro M, Biffi R (2013) The role of the robotic technique in minimally invasive surgery in rectal cancer. Ecancermedicalscience 7:357

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Ghezzi TL, Luca F, Valvo M, Corleta OC, Zuccaro M, Cenciarelli S, Biffi R (2014) Robotic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparative study of short and long-term outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 40:1072–1079

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Barnajian M, Pettet DR, Kazi E, Foppa C, Bergamaschi R (2014) Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases. Colorectal Dis 16:603–609 Assessing appropriateness for elective colorectal cancer surgery: clinical, oncological, and quality-of-life short-term outcomes employing different treatment approaches. Int J Color DisInt J Colorectal Dis 26, 1317–1327 (2011)

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    DeSouza AL et al (2011) A comparison of open and robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 54:275–282

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kang J, Yoon KJ, Min BS, Hur H, Baik SH, Kim NK, Lee KY (2013) The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison–open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. Ann Surg 257:95–101

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bartoli A et al (2009) Short- and medium-term outcome of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic rectal resection. J Soc Laparoen dosc Surg 13:176–183

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Wang G, Wang Z, Jiang Z, et al (2017) Maleurinaryandsexualfunctionafterrobotic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Int J Med Robot 13

  53. 53.

    Jimenez Rodriguez RM, Diaz Pavon JM, de La Portilla de Juan F et al (2011) Prospective randomised study: robotic-assisted versus conventional laparo- scopic surgery in colorectal cancer resection [Spanish]. Cir Esp 89:432–438

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Kim JY, Kim NK, Lee KY, Hur H, Min BS, Kim JH (2012) A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2485–2493

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Cho MS, Baek SJ, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK (2015) Short and long-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Medicine 94(11):e522.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Kim NK, Kang J (2010) Optimal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: the role of robotic surgery from an expert’s view. J Korean Soc Colo-Proctol 26:377–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Baek JH, McKenzie S, Garcia-Aguilar J, Pigazzi A (2010) Oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg 251:882–886

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Adam IJ, Mohamdee MO, Martin IG, Scott N, Finan PJ, Johnston D et al (1994) Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Lancet 344:707–711

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Wibe A, Syse A, Andersen E, Tretli S, Myrvold HE, Søreide O, Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group (2004) Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 47:48–58

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS (1986) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet. 2:996–999

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    de Haas-Kock DF, Baeten CG, Jager JJ, Langendijk JA, Schouten LJ, Volovics A et al (1996) Prognostic significance of radial margins of clearance in rectal cancer. Br J Surg 83:781–785

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Baik SH, Kim NK, Lee YC, Kim H, Lee KY, Sohn SK, Cho CH (2007) Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:462–469

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, Boller AM, George V, Abbas M, Peters WR Jr, Maun D, Chang G, Herline A, Fichera A, Mutch M, Wexner S, Whiteford M, Marks J, Birnbaum E, Margolin D, Larson D, Marcello P, Posner M, Read T, Monson J, Wren SM, Pisters PWT, Nelson H (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 314(13):1346–1355

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Fürst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ, COlorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW et al (2015) Effectoflaparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314:1356–1363

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, Lim SB, Lee TG, Kim DY, Kim JS, Chang HJ, Lee HS, Kim SY, Jung KH, Hong YS, Kim JH, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Oh JH (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11:637–645

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Cui Y, Li C, Xu Z, Wang Y, Sun Y, Xu H, Li Z, Sun Y (2017) Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic operation in anus-preserving rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag 13:1247–1257

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Sun Y, Xu H, Li Z, Han J, Song W, Wang J, Xu Z (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 14:61

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Xiong B, Ma L, Huang W, Zhao Q, Cheng Y, Liu J (2015) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of eight studies. J Gastrointest Surg 19(3):516–526

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Liao G, Li YB, Zhao Z, Li X, Deng H, Li G (2016) Robotic-assisted surgery versus open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer: the current evidence. Sci Rep 6:26981

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Kim MJ, Park SC, Park JW et al (2018) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a phase II open label prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 267:243–251

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Debakey Y, Zaghloul A, Farag A, Mahmoud A, Elattar I (2018) Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic approach for rectal cancer surgery, First Egyptian Academic Center Experience, RCT. Minim Invasive Surg 2018:5836562

  73. 73.

    Kwak JM, Kim SH, Kim J, Son DN, Baek SJ, Cho JS (2011) Robotic vs laparo- scopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 54:151–156

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Pigazzi A, ROLARR Study Group. Results of robotic vs laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: ROLARR study. American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons annual scientific meeting; June 1, 2015, Boston MA

  75. 75.

    Luca F, Valvo M, Ghezzi TL, Zuccaro M, Cenciarelli S, Trovato C, Sonzogni A, Biffi R (2013) Impact of robotic surgery on sexual and urinary functions after fully robotic nerve-sparing total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 257(4):672–678

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    D’Annibale A, Pernazza G, Monsellato I et al (2013) Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 6:1,887–1,895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Lee SH, Lim S, Kim JH, Lee KY (2015) Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Treat Res 89(4):190–201

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Broholm M, Pommergaard HC, Gogenur I (2015) Possible benefits of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery regarding urological and sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Color Dis 17(5):375–381

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY, Lee HJ, Woo IT, Park IK (2018) Selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection: a comparative study of the robotic versus laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc 32(5):2466–2473

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Fujita S, Akasu T, Mizusawa J, Saito N, Kinugasa Y, Kanemitsu Y, Ohue M, Fujii S, Shiozawa M, Yamaguchi T, Moriya Y, Colorectal Cancer Study Group of Japan Clinical Oncology Group (2012) Postoperative morbidity and mortality after mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for clinical stage II or stage III lower rectal cancer (JCOG0212): results from a multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 13:616–621

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Tomioka H, Kagawa H (2016) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 30(2):721–728

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Kagawa H, Yamakawa Y, Furutani A, Manabe S, Yamaoka Y, Hino H (2018) Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for locally advanced low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 32:4498–4505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Pinan J et al (2014) Robotic transanal total mesorectal excision: a pilot study. Tech Coloproctol 18:1047–1053

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Gomez Ruiz M, Parra IM, Palazuelos CM et al (2015) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 58:145–153

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Huscher CG, Bretagnol F, Ponzano C (2015) Robotic-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision: the key against the Achilles’ heel of rectal cancer? Ann Surg 261:e120–e121

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Kuo LJ, Ngu JC, Tong YS, Chen CC (2017) Combined robotic transanal total mesorectal excision (R-taTME) and single-site plus one-port (R-SSPO) technique for ultra-low rectal surgery-initial experience with a new operation approach. Int J ColorectalDis 32:249–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Kim HJ, Park JS, Choi GS, Park SY, Lee HJ (2017) Fluorescence-guided robotic total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in locally advanced rectal cancer: a video presentation. Dis Colon Rectum 60:1332–1333

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Hellan M, Spinoglio G, Pigazzi A, Lagares-Garcia JA (2014) The influence of fluorescence imaging on the location of bowel transection during robotic left-sided colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 28:1695–1702

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Jafari MD, Lee KH, Halabi WJ (2013) The use of indocyanine green fluorescence to assess anastomotic perfusion during robotic assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery. Surg Endosc 27:3003–3008

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references



Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nam Kyu Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alawfi, H., Kim, H.S., Yang, S.Y. et al. Robotics Total Mesorectal Excision Up To the Minute. Indian J Surg Oncol (2020).

Download citation


  • Robotic
  • Laparoscopy
  • TME
  • Oncologic outcome
  • Functional outcome
  • Cost