Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Reproducibility and Applicability of an EFD® Dispenser in the Prosthetic Technology of Maxillofacial Prostheses

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

Abstract

A reproducible method of dosing pigments can be beneficial and more efficient in the current colour matching procedure in maxillofacial prosthetics. In this study the reproducibility and applicability for pigment dosing of a commercial available EFD® dispenser were tested. The reproducibility of a Performus™ II type EFD® dispenser was tested by repeating dosing experiments with a set of eight syringes filled with pigment pastes (Factor 2; Flagstaff, USA). To evaluate conventional colour matching, four conventionally colour matched samples were polymerized and compared to the original ones. To investigate the reproducibility of the dispenser in practice, a fifth recipe was dispensed 10 times and colour differences were evaluated visually and as well calculated from measurements with a colour and translucency meter (CTM, PBSensortechnology bv). All dispensed amounts of pigment pastes showed a coefficient of variation in weight of less than 10 %. Evaluating the reproductions of four skin batches compared to the original batches, a ∆E2000 colour difference of 3–7 was measured. Evaluating ten reproductions of one skin coloured batch made with the dispenser, color difference ∆E2000 values compared to the average L*a*b* values, were less than 2 and no visual colour differences could be estimated. Conform these results, low colour differences could be measured with the CTM, indicating no visually observable consequences. Despite the estimated coefficient of variation, the reproducibility of the EFD® dispenser in terms of colour difference ∆E2000 of successive dispensing is applicable for colour reproduction in facial prosthetics. Segregation of the current color pastes in due time needs to be taken into consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CTM:

Colour and translucency meter

CIE:

Commission internationale de l’Eclairage

CIEDE2000:

Colour difference described according to the CIE. CIE dE2000, ∆E2000 or dE00

References

  1. Visser A, Raghoebar GM, van Oort RP, Vissink A (2008) Fate of implant-retained craniofacial prostheses: life span and aftercare. Int J Maxillofac Implant 23:89–98

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nikawa H, Chen J, Hamada T, Nishimura M, Polyzois G (2001) Candida albicans colonization on thermal cycled maxillofacial polymeric materials in vitro. J Oral Rehabil 28:526–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eleni PN, Krokida MK, Frangou MJ, Polyzois GL, Maroulis ZB, Marinos-Kouris D (2007) Structural damages of maxillofacial biopolymers under solar aging. J Mater Sci Mater Med 18(9):1675–1681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Oort RP van (1982) Skin colour and facial prosthetics, a colorimetric study. Academic thesis, University of Groningen

  5. Burkinshaw W (2004) Colour in relation to dentistry. Fundamentals of colour science. Br Dent J 196(1):33–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Userguide CTM null series ©, developed by PBSensortechnology & Consultancy BV. Produced by Lode BV. Groningen; 2007

  7. Korfage A, Borsboom PCF, Dijkstra PU, van Oort RP (2009) Analysis of translucency of skin by volume reflection for color formulation of facial prosthesis. J Prosthodont 22(6):151–157

    Google Scholar 

  8. CIE. Colorimetry. 2nd Ed. CIE Publ. No. 15.2. Vienna: Central Bureau of the CIE; 1986

  9. Berns RS (2000) Billmeyer and Saltzman principles of color technology, 3rd edn. New York, Wiley, pp 117–118. ISBN 0-471-19459-0

    Google Scholar 

  10. CIE Technical Report. Improvement to Industrial Colour-Difference Evaluation. CIE Pub No 142-2001. Vienna: Central Bureau of the CIE; 2001

  11. Luo MR, Cui G, Rigg B (2001) The Development of the CIE 2000 colour-difference formula: CIEDE2000. COLOR research and application 26(5):340–350

  12. Bicchierini M, Davalli A, Sacchetti R, Paganelli S (2005) Colorimetric analysis of silicone cosmetic prostheses for upper-limb amputees. JRRD 42:655–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank T. Koeman for his contribution to the development of the design and measurements, Prof. Dr. P.U. Dijkstra for his contribution in the statistical analysis, and A. Korfage for her contribution and assistance in the writing process. A grant from the province of Groningen, the Netherlands, and Cooperation Northern-Netherlands related to the European EFRO-program (IAG grant B05) made this study possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. P. van Oort.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blokland, L., Borsboom, P.C.F., Stokman, M.A. et al. The Reproducibility and Applicability of an EFD® Dispenser in the Prosthetic Technology of Maxillofacial Prostheses. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 13, 220–225 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0291-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0291-5

Keywords

Navigation