Twenty-first Century Bedside Manner: Exploring Patient-Centered Communication in Secure Messaging with Cancer Patients

Abstract

Patient-centered communication (PCC) is integral to providing high-quality health care and is recommended to be incorporated during face-to-face consultations. Electronic communication, such as the use of secure messaging (SM) within patient portals, is a popular form of patient-provider communication, but preliminary studies have shown that PCC is rarely utilized by providers in SM. As a consequence, the patient-provider relationship can be negatively affected, especially for cancer patients who have greater electronic health information needs than the general population. Therefore, our objective was to determine the importance of SM to cancer patients and to identify which attributes of PCC are preferred to be incorporated into secure messages. Five focus groups were conducted, comprised of patients with a current or previous cancer diagnosis (three all-female; two all-male). Participants recalled their own experiences and reviewed simulated messages. Three main topics emerged from the thematic analysis: (1) the normalization of SM, (2) SM quality can affect perceptions of care, and (3) patients need guidance. Overall, participants valued the ability to communicate with their care team using SM and indicated that electronic communication may have the potential to have just as big of an impact on a patient’s care than in-person communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. 1.

    Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academy Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    McCormack LA, Treiman K, Rupert D, Williams-Piehota P, Nadler E, Arora NK, Lawrence W, Street RL Jr (2011) Measuring patient-centered communication in cancer care: a literature review and the development of a systematic approach. Soc Sci Med 72(7):1085–1095

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Street RL et al (2009) How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns 74(3):295–301

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Arora NK, Street RL Jr, Epstein RM, Butow PN (2009) Facilitating patient-centered cancer communication: a road map. Patient Educ Couns 77(3):319–321

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Simard S, Thewes B, Humphris G, Dixon M, Hayden C, Mireskandari S, Ozakinci G (2013) Fear of cancer recurrence in adult cancer survivors: a systematic review of quantitative studies. J Cancer Surviv 7(3):300–322

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Fallowfield L, Jenkins V (1999) Effective communication skills are the key to good cancer care. Eur J Cancer 35(11):1592–1597

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Street RL et al (2018) Cancer survivors' experiences with breakdowns in patient-centered communication. Psycho-Oncology. 2019;28(2):423-429

  8. 8.

    Mallinger JB, Griggs JJ, Shields CG (2005) Patient-centered care and breast cancer survivors’ satisfaction with information. Patient Educ Couns 57(3):342–349

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Crotty BH, Tamrat Y, Mostaghimi A, Safran C, Landon BE (2014) Patient-to-physician messaging: volume nearly tripled as more patients joined system, but per capita rate plateaued. Health Aff 33(10):1817–1822

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Masterman M et al. (2016) Adoption of secure messaging in a patient portal across pediatric specialties. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings. American Medical Informatics Association

  11. 11.

    Cronin R, Davis SE, Shenson JA, Chen Q, Rosenbloom ST, Jackson GP (2015) Growth of secure messaging through a patient portal as a form of outpatient interaction across clinical specialties. Appl Clin Inform 6(2):288–304

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kane B, Sands DZ (1998) Guidelines for the clinical use of electronic mail with patients. J Am Med Inform Assoc 5(1):104–111

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lee J et al. (2017) A critical appraisal of guidelines for electronic communication between patients and clinicians: the need to modernize current recommendations. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2017;25(4):413-418

  14. 14.

    Hassol A, Walker JM, Kidder D, Rokita K, Young D, Pierdon S, Deitz D, Kuck S, Ortiz E (2004) Patient experiences and attitudes about access to a patient electronic health care record and linked web messaging. J Am Med Inform Assoc 11(6):505–513

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Swenson SL, Buell S, Zettler P, White M, Ruston DC, Lo B (2004) Patient-centered communication. J Gen Intern Med 19(11):1069–1079

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Krupat E, Bell RA, Kravitz RL, Thom D, Azari R (2001) When physicians and patients think alike: patient-centered beliefs and their impact on satisfaction and trust. J Fam Pract 50(12):1057–1063

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kittler A, Pizziferri L, Volk L, Jagannath Y, Wald J, Bates D (2004) Primary care physician attitudes towards using a secure web-based portal designed to facilitate electronic communication with patients. J Innov Health Inform 12(3):129–138

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Beckjord EB, Rechis R, Nutt S, Shulman L, Hesse BW (2011) What do people affected by cancer think about electronic health information exchange? Results from the 2010 LIVESTRONG Electronic Health Information Exchange Survey and the 2008 Health Information National Trends Survey. J Oncol Pract 7(4):237–241

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Chou W-YS et al (2009) Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication. Journal of medical Internet research. 2009;11(4):e48

  20. 20.

    Goldzweig C et al. (2012) Systematic review: secure messaging between providers and patients, and patients’ access to their own medical record: evidence on health outcomes, Satisfaction, Efficiency and Attitudes. 2012

  21. 21.

    Katzen C, Solan M, Dicker A (2005) E-mail and oncology: a survey of radiation oncology patients and their attitudes to a new generation of health communication. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 8(2):189–193

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Shimada SL et al (2017) analysis of patientprovider secure messaging at two Veterans Health Administration medical centers: message content and resolution through secure messaging. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2017: p. ocx021

  23. 23.

    North F, Crane SJ, Chaudhry R, Ebbert JO, Ytterberg K, Tulledge-Scheitel SM, Stroebel RJ (2014) Impact of patient portal secure messages and electronic visits on adult primary care office visits. Telemed e-Health 20(3):192–198

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Roter D et al (2008) Can e-mail messages between patients and physicians be patient-centered? Health Commun 23(1):80–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Alpert JM, Dyer KE, Lafata JE (2017) Patient-centered communication in digital medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns 100(10):1852–1858

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wade-Vuturo AE, Mayberry LS, Osborn CY (2012) Secure messaging and diabetes management: experiences and perspectives of patient portal users. J Am Med Inform Assoc 20(3):519–525

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Hoonakker PL, Carayon P, Cartmill RS (2017) The impact of secure messaging on workflow in primary care: results of a multiple-case, multiple-method study. Int J Med Inform 100:63–76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Johnson LW, Garrido T, Christensen K, Handley M (2014) Successful practices in the use of secure e-mail. Perm J 18(3):50–54

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Mirsky JB, Tieu L, Lyles C, Sarkar U (2015) Readability assessment of patient-provider electronic messages in a primary care setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc 23(1):202–206

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Mirsky JB, Tieu L, Lyles C, Sarkar U (2016) A mixed-methods study of patient–provider e-mail content in a safety-net setting. J Health Commun 21(1):85–91

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hillen MA, de Haes HC, Smets E (2011) Cancer patients’ trust in their physician—a review. Psycho-Oncology 20(3):227–241

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Houston TK, Sands DZ, Jenckes MW, Ford DE (2004) Experiences of patients who were early adopters of electronic communication with their physician: satisfaction, benefits, and concerns. Am J Manag Care 10(9):601–608

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Baur C (2000) Limiting factors on the transformative powers of e-mail in patient-physician relationships: a critical analysis. Health Commun 12(3):239–259

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Haun JN et al (2015) Large-scale survey findings inform patients’ experiences in using secure messaging to engage in patient-provider communication and self-care management: a quantitative assessment. J Med Internet Res, 2015 17(12)

  35. 35.

    Street RL Jr, Gordon HS, Ward MM, Krupat E, Kravitz RL (2005) Patient participation in medical consultations: why some patients are more involved than others. Med Care 43(10):960–969

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Beach WA, Easter DW, Good JS, Pigeron E (2005) Disclosing and responding to cancer “fears” during oncology interviews. Soc Sci Med 60(4):893–910

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Beach WA, Dozier DM (2015) Fears, uncertainties, and hopes: patient-initiated actions and doctors’ responses during oncology interviews. J Health Commun 20(11):1243–1254

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ye J, Rust G, Fry-Johnson Y, Strothers H (2010) E-mail in patient–provider communication: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 80(2):266–273

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Roter D, Hall J (2004) Physician gender and patient-centered communication: a critical review of empirical research. Annu Rev Public Health 25:497–519

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Butow P et al (1994) Patient participation in the cancer consultation: evaluation of a question prompt sheet. Ann Oncol 5(3):199–204

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Fylan F (2005) Semi-structured interviewing. A handbook of research methods for clinical and health psychology. vol. 5. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005:65-78

  42. 42.

    Scientific Software Development GmbH (computer software)

  43. 43.

    Tracy SJ (2012) Qualitative research methods: collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons; 2012

  44. 44.

    Srivastava P, Hopwood N (2009) A practical iterative framework for qualitative data analysis. Int J Qual Methods 8(1):76–84

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative research. Sage Publications Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Creswell JW, Poth CN (2017) Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Sage publications

  47. 47.

    Brandes K, Linn AJ, Butow PN, van Weert JCM (2015) The characteristics and effectiveness of Question Prompt List interventions in oncology: a systematic review of the literature. Psycho-Oncology 24(3):245–252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Powell KR, Deroche C (2018) Predictors and patterns of portal use in patients with multiple chronic conditions. Chronic Illness.https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395318803663

  49. 49.

    Bonvicini KA, Perlin MJ, Bylund CL, Carroll G, Rouse RA, Goldstein MG (2009) Impact of communication training on physician expression of empathy in patient encounters. Patient Educ Couns 75(1):3–10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Batt-Rawden SA, Chisolm MS, Anton B, Flickinger TE (2013) Teaching empathy to medical students: an updated, systematic review. Acad Med 88(8):1171–1177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Bylund CL, Banerjee SC, Bialer PA, Manna R, Levin TT, Parker PA, Schofield E, Li Y, Bartell A, Chou A, Hichenberg SA, Dickler M, Kissane DW (2018) A rigorous evaluation of an institutionally-based communication skills program for post-graduate oncology trainees. Patient Educ Couns 101(11):1924–1933

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Tulsky JA (2005) Interventions to enhance communication among patients, providers, and families. J Palliat Med 8(supplement 1):s-95–s-101

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Brown R et al (2001) Promoting patient participation and shortening cancer consultations: a randomised trial. Br J Cancer 85(9):1273–1279

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Moyer CA, Stern DT, Dobias KS, Cox DT, Katz SJ (2002) Bridging the electronic divide: patient and provider perspectives on e-mail communication in primary care. Am J Manag Care 8(5):427–433

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Kleiner KD, Akers R, Burke BL, Werner EJ (2002) Parent and physician attitudes regarding electronic communication in pediatric practices. Pediatrics 109(5):740–744

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Byrne JM, Elliott S, Firek A (2009) Initial experience with patient-clinician secure messaging at a VA medical center. J Am Med Inform Assoc 16(2):267–270

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Virji A, Yarnall KSH, Krause KM, Pollak KI, Scannell MA, Gradison M, Østbye T (2006) Use of email in a family practice setting: opportunities and challenges in patient- and physician-initiated communication. BMC Med 4(1):18

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Haun JN et al (2017) Clinical practice informs secure messaging benefits and best practices. Appl Clin Inform 8(04):1003–1011

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Lee P, Stewart D, Calugar-Pop C (2014) Technology, media and telecommuniations predictions 2014. 2014; 60. Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Technology-Media-Telecommunications/dttl_TMT_Predictions-2014-lc2.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2019

  60. 60.

    Panattoni L et al. (2017) Costs of potentially preventable emergency department use during cancer treatment: a regional study. In ASCO Quality Care Symposium. Orlando, FL

  61. 61.

    Barney K (2013) Cisco customer experience report for health care announced at HIMSS. [cited 2019 March 14]; Available from: https://blogs.cisco.com/healthcare/cisco-customer-experience-report-for-health-care-announced-at-himss

  62. 62.

    Cronin R et al (2015) Growth of secure messaging through a patient portal as a form of outpatient interaction across clinical specialties. Appl Clin Inform 6(02):288–304

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Nazi KM (2013) The personal health record paradox: health care professionals’ perspectives and the information ecology of personal health record systems in organizational and clinical settings. J Med Internet Res 2013;15(4):e70

  64. 64.

    Dowsett S et al (2000) Communication styles in the cancer consultation: preferences for a patient-centred approach. Psycho-Oncology 9(2):147–156

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Rutten LJF, Arora NK, Bakos AD, Aziz N, Rowland J (2005) Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: a systematic review of research (1980–2003). Patient Educ Couns 57(3):250–261

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the University of Florida Health Cancer Center through the Florida Consortium of National Cancer Institute Centers Program at the University of Florida.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordan M. Alpert.

Ethics declarations

Informed consent was reviewed, and written approval was required before focus groups began.

Conflict of Interest

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the UF Health Cancer Center.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alpert, J.M., Markham, M.J., Bjarnadottir, R.I. et al. Twenty-first Century Bedside Manner: Exploring Patient-Centered Communication in Secure Messaging with Cancer Patients. J Canc Educ 36, 16–24 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01592-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Secure messaging
  • Patient portal
  • Qualitative research
  • Focus groups
  • Health communication