Skip to main content
Log in

Nutritional Online Information for Cancer Patients: a Randomized Trial of an Internet Communication Plus Social Media Intervention

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We hypothesized that cancer patients using an Internet website would show an improvement in the knowledge about healthy eating habits, and this might be enhanced by social media interaction. A 6-month randomized intervention was set up. Eligible subjects were allocated in intervention (IG) and control groups (CG). IG had access to the website, and CG was provided with printed versions. All enrolled participants filled in Nutrition Questionnaire (NQ), Quality of Life Questionnaire (QoL) and Psychological Distress Inventory (PDI), at baseline and after 6 months. The difference between post- vs pre-questionnaires was calculated. Seventy-four subjects (CG 39; IG 35) completed the study. There was an increase in the score after the intervention in both groups for the NQ, even if not statistically significant. Dividing the IG into three categories, no (NI), low (LI) and high interactions (HI), we found a decreased score (improvement) in the CG (−0.2) and in the HI (−1.7), and an increased score (worsening) in the NI (+3.3) (p = NS) analysing the PDI. We found an increased score in the QoL both in CG and IG (adjusted LSMeans +3.5 and +2.8 points, respectively; p = NS). This study represents an example for support cancer patients. Despite the lack of significant effects, critical points and problems encountered may be of interest to researchers and organization working in the cancer setting. Intervention strategies to support patients during the care process are needed in order to attain the full potential of patient-centred care on cancer outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hong Y, Pena-Purcell NC, Ory MG (2012) Outcomes of online support and resources for cancer survivors: a systematic literature review. Patient Educ Couns 86:288–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Maddock C, Camporesi S, Lewis I, Ahmad K, Sullivan R (2012) Online information as a decision making aid for cancer patients: recommendations from the Eurocancercoms project. Eur J Cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) 48:1055–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ruland CM, Andersen T, Jeneson A, Moore S, Grimsbo GH, Borosund E, Ellison MC (2013) Effects of an internet support system to assist cancer patients in reducing symptom distress: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer Nurs 36:6–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuijpers W, Groen WG, Aaronson NK, van Harten WH (2013) A systematic review of web-based interventions for patient empowerment and physical activity in chronic diseases: relevance for cancer survivors. J Med Internet Res 15:e37

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Leykin Y, Thekdi SM, Shumay DM, Munoz RF, Riba M, Dunn LB (2012) Internet interventions for improving psychological well-being in psycho-oncology: review and recommendations. Psycho-Oncology 21:1016–1025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Buriak SE, Potter J (2014) Impact of an online survivorship primer on clinician knowledge and intended practice changes. J Cancer Educ 29:114–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jacquelin-Ravel N, Pichard C (2012) Clinical nutrition, body composition and oncology: a critical literature review of the synergies. Crit Rev in Oncol Hematol 84:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bozzetti F (2013) Nutritional support of the oncology patient. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 87:172–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Caan BJ, Kwan ML, Shu XO, Pierce JP, Patterson RE, Nechuta SJ, Poole EM, Kroenke CH, Weltzien EK, Flatt SW, Quesenberry CP Jr, Holmes MD, Chen WY (2012) Weight change and survival after breast cancer in the after breast cancer pooling project. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:1260–1271

  11. Rock CL, Doyle C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Meyerhardt J, Courneya KS, Schwartz AL, Bandera EV, Hamilton KK, Grant B, McCullough M, Byers T, Gansler T (2012) Nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin 62:243–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van Straten A, Cuijpers P, Smits N (2008) Effectiveness of a web-based self-help intervention for symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 10:e7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. McVie J, G (2008) EuroCancerComs funded under the EU FP7 “Science in Society” (Project number: 230548 ed.)

  14. Gnagnarella P, Misotti A, Santoro L, Akoumianakis D, Milolidakis G, De Lorenzo F, Lombardo C, Sullivan R, McVie G (2011) A dedicated website for cancer subjects, the nutritional support study: preliminary results. Ecancermedicalscience 5:228

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Tenalea. Trans European Network for patient randomisation in clinical trials. http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/eten/cf/opdb/cf/project/index.cfm?mode=detail&project_ref=ETEN_NM12#main-content. Accessed June/6 2013

  16. Parmenter K, Wardle J (1999) Development of a general nutrition knowledge questionnaire for adults. Eur J Clin Nutr 53:298–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. World Cancer Research Fund, Americna Institute for Cancer Research Expert Panel (2007) Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. World Cancer Research Fund, Americna Institute for Cancer Research Expert Panel, Whashington

    Google Scholar 

  18. Friedman DS, Tielsch JM, Vitale S, Bass EB, Schein OD, Steinberg EP (2002) VF-14 item specific responses in patients undergoing first eye cataract surgery: can the length of the VF-14 be reduced? Br J Ophthalmol 86:885–891

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Vespasiani G, Nicolucci A, Erle G, Trento M, Miselli V (2002) Validazione del questionario sulla conoscenza del Diabete – GISED 2001. GIDM 22:109–120

    Google Scholar 

  20. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, Zee B, Pater J (1998) Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol : Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 16:139–144

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Morasso G, Costantini M, Baracco G, Borreani C, Capelli M (1996) Assessing psychological distress in cancer patients: validation of a self-administered questionnaire. Oncology 53:295–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Morasso G, Di Leo S, Caruso A, Decensi A, Beccaro M, Berretta L, Bongiorno L, Cosimelli M, Finelli S, Rondanina G, Santoni W, Stigliano V, Costantini M (2010) Evaluation of a screening programme for psychological distress in cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 18:1545–1552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hesse BW, Hansen D, Finholt T, Munson S, Kellogg W, Thomas JC (2010) Social participation in Health 2.0. Computer 43:45–52

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Mitchell AJ, Ferguson DW, Gill J, Paul J, Symonds P (2013) Depression and anxiety in long-term cancer survivors compared with spouses and healthy controls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 14:721–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mitchell AJ, Chan M, Bhatti H, Halton M, Grassi L, Johansen C, Meader N (2011) Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorder in oncological, haematological, and palliative-care settings: a meta-analysis of 94 interview-based studies. Lancet Oncol 12:160–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Graves KD, Arnold SM, Love CL, Kirsh KL, Moore PG, Passik SD (2007) Distress screening in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic: prevalence and predictors of clinically significant distress. Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 55:215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Curran D, Bottomley A (2001) The EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lydick E, Epstein RS (1993) Interpretation of quality of life changes. Qual Life Res : Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehab 2:221–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. King MT (1996) The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res : Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehab 5:555–567

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bedard G, Zeng, L, Zhang L, Lauzon N, Holden L, Tsao M, Danjoux C, Barnes E, Sahgal A, Poon M, Chow E (2014) Minimal important differences in the EORTC QLQ-C30 in patients with advanced cancer. Asia-Pacific J Clin Oncol 10(2):109-17

  32. Knijnenburg SL, Kremer LC, Versluys AB, Braam KI, Mud MS, van der Pal HJ, Caron HN, Jaspers MW (2013) Evaluation of a patient information website for childhood cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 21:919–926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present work was funded by EuroCancerComs project in the framework of the FP 7 Science in Society Programme—Project number: 230548. Special thanks are due to the Organization of European Cancer Institutes (OECI), the Italian Association for cancer patients, their families and friend (AIMaC), the Italian Federation of Volunteer-Based Cancer Organizations (FAVO), the Italian cancer network Alleanza Contro il Cancro (ACC) and the European Institute of Oncology (IEO). We thank William Russel-Edu for the help with the literature and Cristina Vanazzi for the illustrations used in the website. We thank the group of experts involved in the study for their help, suggestions and comments: Chiara Catania, oncologist, European Institute of Oncology (medical oncology); Elisabetta Iannelli, patient representative, FAVO (legal aspect); Emanuela Omodeo Salè, pharmacist, European Institute of Oncology (medicinal drugs); Rosa Oricchio, psychologist, AIMaC; Anna Rita Sabbatini, dietician, European Institute of Oncology (nutrition) and Alberto Sbanotto, oncologist expert on palliative care, European Institute of Oncology.

Conflicts of Interest

Patrizia Gnagnarella, Alessandro Maria Misotti, Luigi Santoro, Demosthenes Akoumianakis, Laura Del Campo, Francesco De Lorenzo, Claudio Lombardo, Giannis Milolidakis, Richard Sullivan and John Gordon McVie declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Maria Misotti.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 157 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gnagnarella, P., Misotti, A.M., Santoro, L. et al. Nutritional Online Information for Cancer Patients: a Randomized Trial of an Internet Communication Plus Social Media Intervention. J Canc Educ 31, 472–480 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0820-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0820-5

Keywords

Navigation