Anticipated to Enacted: Structural Stigma Against Sexual and Gender Minorities Following the 2016 Presidential Election

Abstract

Introduction

Structural stigma, or stigma at a society or policy level, has a negative impact on the mental and physical health of sexual and gender minorities (SGMs). In particular, political leaders and the policies they enact can limit the resources and safety of SGM. Following the 2016 presidential election, there was fear of an increase in structural stigma in the USA. However, research on the specifics of anticipated structural stigma is lacking.

Methods

Using data from 187 participants who completed an online study conducted from 2016 to 2017, we used inductive thematic coding to examine anticipated structural stigma.

Results

We found four themes: (1) anticipated negative consequences of specific anti-SGM political figures, (2) concerns about the loss of existing SGM rights, (3) fear of new anti-SGM policies, and (4) fears of vulnerability related to limited existing protections.

Conclusion

We discuss how these themes tie into each other, map them onto existing structural stigma work, and use laws and policies that have been passed or proposed in the past 4 years to describe how these anticipated stigmas have become enacted.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Agerholm, H. (2016). Everyone appointed to Donald Trump’s cabinet so far has opposed LGBT rights. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-cabinet-appointments-lgbt-records-stances-president-elect-white-house-a7446886.html

  2. American Civil Liberties Union. (2018). Past legislation affecting LGBT rights across the country (2018). https://www.aclu.org/past-legislation-affecting-lgbt-rights-across-country-2018

  3. American Civil Liberties Union. (2019). Past legislation affecting LGBT rights across country 2019. https://www.aclu.org/past-legislation-affecting-lgbt-rights-across-country-2019

  4. American Civil Liberties Union. (2020). Legislation affecting LGBT rights across the country. https://www.aclu.org/legislation-affecting-lgbt-rights-across-country

  5. American Psychological Association. (2017). Many Americans stressed about future of our nation, new APA Stress in America survey reveals. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2017/02/stressed-nation

  6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research, 3(2), 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brooks, V. R. (1981). Minority stress and lesbian women. Lexington Books.

  8. Byne, W. (2017). Sustaining progress toward LGBT health equity: A time for vigilance, advocacy, and scientific inquiry. LGBT Health, 4, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2016.0211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Change Notice 5200.04 CN-1 – Transgender Offender Manual. (2018). https://www.bop.gov/policy/progstat/5200-04-cn-1.pdf

  10. Conron, K. J., & O’Neill, K. (2020). Prohibiting gender-affirming medical care for youth. The Williams Institute. https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/bans-trans-youth-health-care/

  11. Cornell University Public Policy Research Portal. (2017). What does the scholarly research say about the effect of gender transition on transgender well-being? https://whatweknow.inequality.cornell.edu/topics/lgbt-equality/what-does-the-scholarly-research-say-about-the-well-being-of-transgender-people/

  12. DTM-19-004 – Military Service by Transgender Persons and Persons with Gender Dysphoria. (2020). https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dtm/DTM%2019-004.PDF?ver=2020-03-17-140438-090

  13. Flores, A. R., Hatzenbuehler, M. L., & Gates, G. J. (2018). Identifying psychological responses of stigmatized groups to referendums. PNAS, 115(15), 3816–3821. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1712897115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Frost, D. M. (2011). Social stigma and its consequences for the socially stigmatized. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 824–839. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00394.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Frost, D. M., Lehavot, K., & Meyer, I. H. (2015). Minority stress and physical health among sexual minority individuals. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 38, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-013-9523-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. GLAAD. (2020). Trump accountability project. https://www.glaad.org/trump

  17. Gonzales, G., & McKay, T. (2017). What an emerging Trump administration means for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender health. Health Equity, 1, 83–86. https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2017.0002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Gonzalez, K. A., Pulice-Farrow, L., & Galupo, M. P. (2018). “My aunt unfriended me:” Narratives of GLBTQ family relationships post 2016 presidential election. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 14, 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2017.1420845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gonzalez, K. A., Ramirez, J. L., & Galupo, M. P. (2018). Increase in GLBTQ minority stress following the 2016 US presidential election. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 14, 130–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2017.1420849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H.R.2965 – Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal Act of 2010. (2010). https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/house-bill/2965

  21. H.R.5 – Equality Act. (2019). https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5/text/eh

  22. Hatzenbuehler, M. L. (2014). Structural stigma and the health of lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414523775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hatzenbuehler, M. L. (2016). Structural stigma: Research evidence and implications for psychological science. American Psychologist, 71, 742–751. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hatzenbuehler, M. L. (2017). Structural stigma and health. In B. Major, J. F. Dovidio, & B. G. Link (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of stigma, discrimination, and health (pp. 105-121). Oxford University Press.

  25. Hatzenbuehler, M. L., & Link, B. G. (2014). Introduction to the special issue on structural stigma and health. Social Science & Medicine, 103, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.12.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Rutherford, C., McKetta, S., Prins, S. J., & Keyes, K. M. (2020). Structural stigma and all-cause mortality among sexual minorities: Differences by sexual behavior?. Social Science & Medicine244, 112463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112463

  27. Health and Human Services. (2018). HHS announces new Conscience and Religious Freedom Division. https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2018/01/18/hhs-ocr-announces-new-conscience-and-religious-freedom-division.html

  28. Hirsch, J. K., Hirsch, K. K., Mann, A., Williams, S. L., Dodd, J., Cohn, T. J., & Chang, E. C. (2017). Post-election concerns about rights and safety are related to the mental health of LGBTQ communities: This is not fake news. Forward Newsletter, 257.

  29. Hirsch, J. K., Kaniuka, A., Brooks, B., Hirsch, K. K., Mann, A., Williams, S. L., & Dodd, J. (2017). What the Trump? Anticipated rejection and concern about rights are associated with suicide risk in LGBTQ communities, but can resilience trump risk?. The Clinical Psychologist70(2), 17-20. https://www.div12.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/tCP-May-2017.pdf

  30. Indiana State Bill 101 - Religious Freedom Restoration Act. (2015). https://www.indianahouserepublicans.com/clientuploads/PDF/RFRA/SEA101%20RFRA%20Law.pdf

  31. Kaniuka, A., Pugh, K. C., Jordan, M., Brooks, B., Dodd, J., Mann, A. K., et al. (2019). Stigma and suicide risk among the LGBTQ population: Are anxiety and depression to blame and can connectedness to the LGBTQ community help? Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 23, 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2018.1560385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kralik, J. (2019). “Bathroom bill” legislative tracking. National Conference of State Legislatures. https://www.ncsl.org/research/education/-bathroom-bill-legislative-tracking635951130.aspx

  33. Kreighbaum, A. (2017). Transgender protections withdrawn. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/02/23/trump-administration-reverses-title-ix-guidance-transgender-protections

  34. Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Meyer, I. H. (2016). Does an improved social environment for sexual and gender minorities have implications for a new minority stress research agenda? Psychology of Sexualities Review, 7, 81–90.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Meyer, I. H., Ouellette, S. C., Haile, R., & McFarlane, T. A. (2011). “We’d be free”: Narratives of life without homophobia, racism, or sexism. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 8, 204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-011-0063-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Meyer, I. H., & Wilson, P. A. (2009). Sampling lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. National Center for Transgender Equality. (2017). HUD purges publications that helped shelters keep transgender people safe. https://transequality.org/press/releases/hud-purges-publications-that-helped-shelters-keep-transgender-people-safe

  39. National Low Income Housing Coalition. (2019). Democratic representatives condemn HUD actions undermining housing first model and safety of LGBTQ community. https://nlihc.org/resource/democratic-representatives-condemn-hud-actions-undermining-housing-first-model-and-safety

  40. North Carolina House Bill 142. (2017). https://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2017/Bills/House/HTML/H142v5.html

  41. North Carolina House Bill 2 - Public Facilities Privacy & Security Act. (2016). https://www.ncleg.gov/Sessions/2015E2/Bills/House/PDF/H2v0.pdf

  42. North Carolina House Bill 65 – Marriage Amendment Reaffirmation Act. (2019). https://www.ncleg.gov/BillLookup/2019/H65

  43. North Carolina House Bill 780 – Uphold Historical Marriage Act. (2017). https://www.ncleg.gov/BillLookUp/2017/HB%20780

  44. Obergefell v Hodges, 576 U.S. ___ (2015). https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf

  45. Pachankis, J. E., & Bränström, R. (2018). Hidden from happiness: Structural stigma, sexual orientation concealment, and life satisfaction across 28 countries. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 86, 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Pachankis, J. E., Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Hickson, F. C., Weatherburn, P. J., Berg, R., Marcus, U., & Schmidt, A. (2015). Hidden from health: Structural stigma, sexual orientation concealment, and HIV across 38 countries in the European MSM Internet Survey. AIDS, 29, 1239–1246. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000000724.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Pachankis, J. E., Sullivan, T. J., Feinstein, B. A., & Newcomb, M. E. (2018). Young adult gay and bisexual men’s stigma experiences and mental health: An 8-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 54(7), 1381–1392. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000518.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Perez-Brumer, A., Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Oldenburg, C. E., & Bockting, W. (2015). Individual- and structural-level risk factors for suicide attempts among transgender adults. Behavioral Medicine, 41, 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2015.1028322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Pew Research Center. (2019). Attitudes on same-sex marriage. https://www.pewforum.org/fact-sheet/changing-attitudes-on-gay-marriage/

  50. Quinn, D. M., & Chaudoir, S. R. (2009). Living with a concealable stigmatized identity: The impact of anticipated stigma, centrality, salience, and cultural stigma on psychological distress and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 634–651. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015815.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Quinn, D. M., & Earnshaw, V. A. (2013). Concealable stigmatized identity and psychological well-being. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 40-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12005

  52. Riggle, E. D., Rostosky, S. S., Drabble, L., Veldhuis, C. B., & Hughes, T. L. (2018). Sexual minority women’s and gender-diverse individuals’ hope and empowerment responses to the 2016 presidential election. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 14, 152–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2017.1420853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Riggle, E. D., Rostosky, S. S., & Horne, S. G. (2009). Marriage amendments and lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals in the 2006 election. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 6, 80. https://doi.org/10.1525/srsp.2009.6.1.80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. RIN 0945-AA10 – Protecting Statutory Conscience Rights in Health Care; Delegations of Authority. (2019). https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/05/21/2019-09667/protecting-statutory-conscience-rights-in-health-care-delegations-of-authority

  55. RIN 1250-AA07 – Implementation of Executive Order 13672 Prohibiting Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity by Contractors and Subcontractors. (2014). https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2014/12/09/2014-28902/implementation-of-executive-order-13672-prohibiting-discrimination-based-on-sexual-orientation-and

  56. RIN 1250-AA08 – Affirmative Action and Nondiscrimination Obligations of Federal Contractors and Subcontractors: TRICARE and Certain Other Health Care Providers. (2019). https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/11/06/2019-23700/affirmative-action-and-nondiscrimination-obligations-of-federal-contractors-and-subcontractors

  57. RIN 1250-AA09 – Implementing Legal Requirements Regarding the Equal Opportunity Clause’s Religious Exemption. (2019). https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/08/15/2019-17472/implementing-legal-requirements-regarding-the-equal-opportunity-clauses-religious-exemption

  58. RIN 1840-AD36 – Student Assistance General Provisions, The Secretary’s Recognition of Accrediting Agencies, The Secretary’s Recognition Procedures for State Agencies. (2019). https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/11/01/2019-23129/student-assistance-general-provisions-the-secretarys-recognition-of-accrediting-agencies-the

  59. RIN 2506-AC53 – Revised Requirements Under Community Planning and Development Housing Programs (FR-6152). (2019). https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaViewRule?pubId=201904&RIN=2506-AC53

  60. Rostosky, S. S., Riggle, E. D. B., Horne, S. G., Denton, F. N., & Huellemeier, J. D. (2010). Lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals’ psychological reactions to amendments denying access to civil marriage. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80, 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01033.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Rostosky, S. S., Riggle, E. D., Horne, S. G., & Miller, A. D. (2009). Marriage amendments and psychological distress in lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) adults. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Salway, T., Gesink, D., Ibrahim, S., Ferlatte, O., Rhodes, A. E., Brennan, D. J., et al. (2018). Evidence of multiple mediating pathways in associations between constructs of stigma and self-reported suicide attempts in a cross-sectional study of gay and bisexual men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47, 1145–1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1019-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Santiago, J. (2017). The transgender military ban: A major step back for LGBT rights. Loyola Public Interest Law Reporter, 56.

  64. Simonoff, C., Wang, T., & Cahill, S. (2019). In its third year in office, the Trump administration dramatically expanded discriminatory anti-LGBT policies. The Fenway Institute. https://fenwayhealth.org/wp-content/uploads/Trump-Administration-Year-3-Brief.pdf

  65. South Carolina House Bill 4949 – Marriage and Constitution Restoration Act. (2018). https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess122_2017-2018/bills/4949.htm

  66. South Dakota House Bill 1215. (2020). https://sdlegislature.gov/legislative_session/bills/Bill.aspx?Bill=1215&Session=2020

  67. Stack, L. (2016). Mike Pence and “conversion therapy”: A history. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/30/us/politics/mike-pence-and-conversion-therapy-a-history.html

  68. Tennessee House Bill 1369 – Tennessee Natural Marriage Defense Act. (2019). https://legiscan.com/TN/bill/HB1369/2019

  69. Tennessee House Bill 2410 – Disentanglement Act. (2020). https://legiscan.com/TN/bill/HB2410/2019

  70. Tennessee House Bill 892 – Tennessee Natural Marriage Defense Act. (2017). https://legiscan.com/TN/bill/HB0892/2017

  71. Trevor Project. (2016). Crisis contracts from youth to Trevor Project surge immediately following the election. https://www.thetrevorproject.org/trvr_press/crisis-contacts-from-youth-to-the-trevor-project-surge-immediately-following-the-election/

  72. Turban, J. L., King, D., Carswell, J. M., & Keuroghlain, A. S. (2020). Pubertal suppression for transgender youth and risk of suicidal ideation. Pediatrics, 145, e20191725. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1725.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Turner, C. & Kamenetz, A. (2018). The education department says it won’t act on transgender student bathroom access. NPR. https://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2018/02/12/585181704/the-education-department-says-it-wont-act-on-transgender-student-bathroom-access

  74. Veldhuis, C. B., Drabble, L., Riggle, E. D. B., Wootton, A. R., & Hughes, T. L. (2018a). “We won’t go back into the closet now without one hell of a fight”: Effects of the 2016 presidential election on sexual minority women’s and gender minorities’ stigma-related concerns. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 15, 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-017-0305-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Veldhuis, C. B., Drabble, L., Riggle, E. D., Wootton, A. R., & Hughes, T. L. (2018b). “I fear for my safety, but want to show bravery for others”: Violence and discrimination concerns among transgender and gender-nonconforming individuals after the 2016 presidential election. Violence and Gender, 5, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2017.0032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Wagner, S. (2019). Re: Request for deviation or exception from HHS regulations 45 CFR § 75.300(c). https://governor.sc.gov/sites/default/files/Documents/newsroom/HHS%20Response%20Letter%20to%20McMaster.pdf

  77. Whitehead, J., Shaver, J., & Stephenson, R. (2016). Outness, stigma, and primary health care utilization among rural LGBT populations. PloS one11(1).

  78. Williams, D. R., & Medlock, M. M. (2017). Health effects of dramatic societal events—ramifications of the recent presidential election. New England Journal of Medicine, 376, 2295–2299. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMms1702111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Williams, S. L., Mann, A. K., & Fredrick, E. G. (2017). Proximal minority stress, psychosocial resources, and health in sexual minorities. Journal of Social Issues, 73, 529–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Wyoming House Bill 167 – Marriage and Constitution Restoration Act. (2018). https://legiscan.com/WY/bill/HB0167/2018

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma G. Fredrick.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

This study was performed in compliance with ethical standards for research involving human participants as outlined by the Declaration of Helsinki. It was approved by the Institutional Review Board of East Tennessee State University.

Informed Consent

Electronic informed consent was gathered from all participants in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fredrick, E.G., Mann, A.K., Brooks, B.D. et al. Anticipated to Enacted: Structural Stigma Against Sexual and Gender Minorities Following the 2016 Presidential Election. Sex Res Soc Policy (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-021-00547-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Sexual minority
  • Gender minority
  • Structural stigma
  • Anticipated stigma