Abstract
Introduction
According to data from the General Social Survey (GSS), abortion attitudes have remained relatively stable since 1972. Despite this apparent stability, some researchers argue abortion opinions have become increasingly polarized, particularly among certain subgroups. Others argue people’s attitudes toward abortion are complex and nuanced; that is, people may feel conflicted or ambivalent about abortion in certain contexts. To better understand this issue, we examined complexity and polarization in people’s attitudes toward abortion using GSS data from 1972 until 2018 (n = 44,302).
Methods
The GSS includes six items assessing whether it should be possible for “a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion” under specific circumstances. Using these items, we created an aggregate complexity measure. Negative binomial, Poisson, and logistic regression models were tested to assess potential changes in complexity and polarization over time among demographic subgroups.
Results
Findings indicate changes in complexity across political party affiliations, religious identity, and age groups. However, any significant differences among these demographic subgroups are lost once polarized scores are removed. That is, changes in complexity are driven largely by more people supporting access to abortion in all or no situations; among those who remain conflicted, there has been little change in complexity.
Discussion
These findings provide a more nuanced assessment of trends in abortion attitudes. Given the saliency of this issue, we recommend researchers consider alternative mechanisms to assess abortion attitudes.
Policy Implication
These nuanced assessments of abortion attitudes should be considered when determining the congruence between abortion legislation and public opinion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Notes
By complex, we mean people may feel conflicted in their stance toward abortion such that their opinions may be dependent on context (e.g., abortion is immoral but should be legal) or may vary from one situation to the next. Complexity in opinion can also refer to feelings of ambivalence in general or ambivalence in relation to abortion in certain contexts.
By non-complex, we refer to people who provided unilateral responses to the General Social Survey questions (0 and 6) compared with complex people who provided responses falling between these extremes (1–5). See the “Method” section for more detail.
References
Adamczyk, A., & Valdimarsdóttir, M. (2018). Understanding Americans’ abortion attitudes: The role of the local religious context. Social Science Research, 71, 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.12.005.
Bowman, K., & Sims, H. (2017). AEI [American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research] public opinion studies: Attitudes about abortion. Retrieved from: http://www.aei.org/publication/aeipublic-opinion-study-attitudes-about-abortion-2017/.
Bumpass, L. L. (1997). The measurement of public opinion on abortion: The effects of survey design. Family Planning Perspectives, 29, 177–180. https://doi.org/10.2307/2953382.
Converse, P. E. (1992). Comment on Davis’s “Changeable weather in a cooling climate atop the liberal plateau.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 56(3), 307–310. https://doi.org/10.1086/269323.
Dillon, M. (1996). The American abortion debate: Culture war or normal discourse? In J. L. Nolan (Ed.), The American culture wars: current contests and future prospects (pp. 115–132). Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. (1996). Have American’s social attitudes become more polarized? American Journal of Sociology, 102(3), 690–755. https://doi.org/10.1086/230995.
Evans, J. H. (1997). Worldviews or social groups as the source of moral value attitudes: Implications for the culture wars thesis. Sociological Forum, 12(3), 371–404. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024625210910.
Evans, J. H. (2002). Polarization in abortion attitudes in US religious traditions, 1972–1998. Sociological Forum, 17(3), 397–422. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019627006778.
Evans, J. H. (2003). Have Americans’ attitudes become more polarized?—an update. Social Science Quarterly, 84(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8401005.
Gay, D. A., Ellison, C. G., & Powers, D. A. (1996). In search of denominational subcultures: Religious affiliation and “pro-family” issues revisited. Review of Religious Research, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/3512537.
Guttmacher. (2016). Last five years account for more than one-quarter of all abortion restrictions enacted since Row. Retrieved from: https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2016/01/last-five-years-account-more-one-quarter-all-abortion-restrictions-enacted-roe.
Hans, J. D., & Kimberly, C. (2014). Abortion attitudes in context: A multidimensional vignette approach. Social Science Research, 48, 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.001.
Hess, J. A., & Rueb, J. D. (2005). Attitudes toward abortion, religion, and party affiliation among college students. Current Psychology, 24(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-005-1002-0.
Hill, A. (2004). The relationship between attitudes about abortion and cognitive complexity. UW-L Journal of Undergraduate Research, vii, 1–6.
Jelen, T. G., & Wilcox, C. (2003). Causes and consequences of public attitudes toward abortion: A review and research agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56(4), 489–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600410.
Jozkowski, K. N., Crawford, B. L., & Hunt, M. E. (2018). Complexity in attitudes toward abortion access: Results from two studies. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 15(4), 464–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-018-0322-4.
Liptak, A. (2019). Supreme Court to hear abortion case from Louisiana. The New York Times, Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/04/us/politics/supreme-court-abortion-louisiana.html.
Luker, K. (1984). Abortion and the politics of motherhood. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Miller, A. S., & Hoffmann, J. P. (1999). The growing divisiveness: Culture wars or a war of words? Social Forces, 78(2), 721–745. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/78.2.721.
Mouw, T., & Sobel, M. E. (2001). Culture wars and opinion polarization: The case of abortion. American Journal of Sociology, 106(4), 913–943. https://doi.org/10.1086/320294.
Mundfrom, D. J., Perrett, D. J., Schaffer, J., Piccone, A., & Roozeboom, M. (2006). Bonferroni adjustments in tests for regression coefficients. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 32, 1–6.
Munson, Z. (2018). Abortion politics. Medford, MA: John Wiley & Sons.
Nagelkerke, N. J. (1991). A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78(3), 691–692. https://doi.org/10.2307/2337038.
Nash, E. (2019). A surge in bans on abortion as early as six weeks, before most people know they are pregnant. Retrieved from https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2019/03/surge-bans-abortion-early-six-weeks-most-people-know-they-are-pregnant.
Nash, E., Mohammed, L., Callello, O., & Naide, S. (2019). State policy trends 2019: A wave of abortion bands, but some states are fighting back. Retrieved from https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2019/12/state-policy-trends-2019-wave-abortion-bans-some-states-are-fighting-back.
Oberman, M. (2018). Her body, our laws: On the front lines of the abortion war, from El Salvador to Oklahoma. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1992). The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Ripley, B., Venables, B., Bates, D. M., Hornik, K., Gebhardt, A., Firth, D., & Ripley, M. B. (2019). Package ‘MASS.’ Cran R. Retrieved from http://cran.univ-paris1.fr/web/packages/MASS/MASS.pdf.
Rouff, L. L. (1975). Openness, creativity, and complexity. Psychological Reports, 37, 1009–1010. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1975.37.3.1009.
Smith, T. W., & Son, J. (2013). Trends in public attitudes towards abortion (p. 50). National Opinion Research Center.
Strickler, J., & Danigelis, N. L. (2002). Changing frameworks in attitudes toward abortion. Sociological Forum, 17(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016033012225.
Sullins, D. P. (1999). Catholic/Protestant trends on abortion: Convergence and polarity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 354–369. https://doi.org/10.2307/1387757.
Times, T. N. Y. (2018). The Future of Roe v. Wade: 3 Scenarios, Explained. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/politics/100000006011721/roe-v-wade-abortion-supreme-court.html.
Toobin, J.: Roe v. Wade will be overturned (2018) - CNN Video. https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/10/05/jeffrey-toobin-abortion-roe-illegalkavanaugh-tsr-vpx.cnn.
Torres-Reyna, O. (2010). Getting started in fixed/random effects models using R. Data & Statistical Services. Princeton University.
Wang, G. Z., & Buffalo, M. D. (2004). Social and cultural determinants of attitudes toward abortion: A test of Reiss’ hypotheses. The Social Science Journal, 41(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2003.10.008.
Watson, K. (2018). Scarlet a: The ethics, law, and politics of ordinary abortion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Items from the GSS assessing respondents’ opinions on whether abortion should be legal under specific circumstances:
-
1.
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if there is a strong chance of a serious birth defect in the baby?
-
2.
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if she is married and does not want any more children?
-
3.
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if the woman’s own health is seriously endangered by the pregnancy?
-
4.
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if the family has a very low income and cannot afford any more children?
-
5.
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if she is not married and does not want to marry the man?
-
6.
Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if she became pregnant as a result of rape?
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jozkowski, K.N., Crawford, B.L. & Willis, M. Abortion Complexity Scores from 1972 to 2018: A Cross-Sectional Time-Series Analysis Using Data from the General Social Survey. Sex Res Soc Policy 18, 13–26 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-020-00439-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-020-00439-9