The Effect of Survival Economy Participation on Transgender Experiences of Service Provider Discrimination
- 17 Downloads
This study determines how transgender involvement in survival economies, namely sex work and drug sales, affects transgender experiences of service provider discrimination, in comparison to discrimination experienced by transgender people not involved in survival economies. It utilizes cross-sectional data from the 2008–2009 National Transgender Discrimination Survey (NTDS). Multivariate logistic regression is conducted on the sample (n = 4927) to determine the strength of association. Logistic regression sub-analysis is used to compare discrimination across different service provider contexts. Compared to those not participating in survival economies, participating in sex work has almost three times greater odds (OR 2.83, CI 2.20–3.63), and those participating in drug sales have approximately 1.5 greater odds (OR 1.52, CI 1.16–1.99), of experiencing discrimination from service providers. Participation in survival economies is a significant predictor of a transgender person’s increased likelihood of experiencing service provider discrimination. Findings suggest that service providers must attend to the specificity of transgender experiences in survival economies. Harm reduction is offered as a suitable intervention approach.
KeywordsTransgender Survival economy Sex work Service provider discrimination Service delivery Harm reduction
This paper would not be possible without the encouragement and support of Dr. Shanta Pandey, Dr. Vithya Murugan, and the 2013–2014 MSW Research Specialization cohort at the Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis. I would also like to thank the National Center for Transgender Equality, the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, and the researchers and administrators of the National Transgender Discrimination Survey for supplying the data used in this paper.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he has no competing interests.
Approval for human subject’s research was obtained from the Pennsylvania State University’s IRB. Since this article utilizes secondary data, there are no further ethical issues, including informed consent.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
- Burnes, T. R., Rojas, E. M., Delgado, I., & Watkins, T. E. (2017). “Wear some thick socks if you walk in my shoes”: Agency, resilience, and well-being in communities of north american sex workers. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1–10.Google Scholar
- Ditmore, M. H. (2013). When sex work and drug use overlap: Considerations for advocacy and practice. London: Harm Reduction International.Google Scholar
- Grant, J. M., Mottet, L. A., Tanis, J., Harrison, J., Herman, J. L., & Keisling, M. (2011). Injustice at every turn: A report of the national transgender discrimination survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality and National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.Google Scholar
- Spade, D. (2006). Mutilating gender. In S. Stryker & S. Whittle (Eds.), The transgender studies reader (pp. 315–332). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Stryker, S. (2009). Transgender history. Seal Press.Google Scholar
- U.S. Transgender Survey (n.d.). Retrieved March 1, 2018, from http://www.ustranssurvey.org/.
- Wilchins, R. A. (2006). What does it cost to tell the truth? In S. Stryker & S. Whittle (Eds.), The transgender studies reader (pp. 547–551). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar