Abstract
Compositional data consists of vectors of proportions whose components sum to 1. Such vectors lie in the standard simplex, which is a manifold with boundary. One issue that has been rather controversial within the field of compositional data analysis is the choice of metric on the simplex. One popular possibility has been to use the metric implied by log-transforming the data, as proposed by Aitchison (Biometrika70, 57–65, 1983, 1986) and another popular approach has been to use the standard Euclidean metric inherited from the ambient space. Tsagris et al. (2011) proposed a one-parameter family of power transformations, the α-transformations, which include both the metric implied by Aitchison’s transformation and the Euclidean metric as particular cases. Our underlying philosophy is that, with many datasets, it may make sense to use the data to help us determine a suitable metric. A related possibility is to apply the α-transformations to a parametric family of distributions, and then estimate α along with the other parameters. However, as we shall see, when one follows this last approach with the Dirichlet family, some care is needed in a certain limiting case which arises (α → 0), as we found out when fitting this model to real and simulated data. Specifically, when the maximum likelihood estimator of α is close to 0, the other parameters tend to be large. The main purpose of the paper is to study this limiting case both theoretically and numerically and to provide insight into these numerical findings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aitchison, J. (1983). Principal components analysis of compositional data. Biometrika 70, 57–65.
Aitchison, J. (1986). The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. Chapman & Hall Ltd, London. Reprinted in 2003 with additional material by The Blackburn Press.
Baxter, M.J. (1995). Standardization and transformation in principal component analysis, with applications to archaeometry. Appl. Stat. 44, 513–527.
Baxter, M.J. (2001). Statistical modelling of artefact compositional data. Archaeometry 43, 131–147.
Baxter, M.J., Beardah, C.C., Cool, H.E.M. and Jackson, C.M. (2005). Compositional data analysis of some alkaline glasses. Math. Geol. 37, 183–196.
Baxter, M.J. and Freestone, I.C. (2006). Log-ratio compositional data analysis in archaeometry. Archaeometry 48, 511–531.
Bhattacharya, A. and Bhattacharya, R.N. (2012). Nonparametric inference on manifolds with applications to shape spaces. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Dryden, I.L., Koloydenko, A. and Zhou, D. (2009). Non-euclidean statistics for covariance matrices, with applications to diffusion tensor imaging. Ann. Appl. Statist. 3, 1102–1123.
Dryden, I.L., Le, H., Preston, S.P. and Wood, A.T.A. (2014). Mean shapes, projections and intrinsic limiting distributions. [Discussion contribution]. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 145, 25–32.
Dryden, I.L. and Mardia, K.V. (1998). Statistical Shape Analysis. Wiley, New York.
Dryden, I.L. and Mardia, K.V. (2016). Statistical Shape Analysis with Applications in r, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York.
Fisher, R.A. (1953). Dispersion on a sphere. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. The Royal Society 217, 295–305.
Fisher, N.I., Lewis, T. and Embleton, B.J.J. (1987). Statistical Analysis of Spherical Data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hartigan, J.A. (1975). Clustering Algorithms. Wiley, New York.
Hotz, T. and Huckemann, S. (2015). Intrinsic means on the circle: uniqueness, Locus and Asymptotics. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 67, 177–193.
Kendall, D.G., Barden, D., Carne, T.K. and Le, H. (1999). Shape and Shape Theory. Wiley, New York.
Mardia, K.V. (1972). Statistics of Directional Data. Academic Press, London.
Mardia, K.V. and Jupp, P.E. (2000). Directional Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
Scealy, J.L. and Welsh, A.H. (2014). Colours and cocktails: compositional data analysis. 2013 Lancaster lecture. Aust. N. Z. J. Stat. 56, 145–169.
Small, C.G. (1996). The Statistical Theory of Shape. Springer, New York.
Tsagris, M.T., Preston, S. and Wood, A.T.A. (2011). A data-based power transformation for compositional data. In: Proceedings of the 4th Compositional Data Analysis Workshop, Girona, Spain.
Tsagris, M., Preston, S. and Wood, A.T.A. (2016). Improved classification for compositional data using the α-transformation. J. Classif. 33, 243–261.
Tsagris, M. and Stewart, C. (2018). A folded model for compositional data analysis. arXiv:1802.07330.
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by EPSRC grant EP/K022547/1, for which we are grateful. Partial results from this research were obtained when the second author was a PhD student at the University of Nottingham.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pantazis, Y., Tsagris, M. & Wood, A.T.A. Gaussian Asymptotic Limits for the α-transformation in the Analysis of Compositional Data. Sankhya A 81, 63–82 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13171-018-00160-1
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13171-018-00160-1