Skip to main content
Log in

How valence, volume and variance of online reviews influence brand attitudes

  • Theory/Conceptual
  • Published:
AMS Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Online reviews can strongly influence purchase decisions. In the past decade, extensive research in the field of online reviews has focused on product categories (e.g., hedonic, utilitarian) and product sales. However, research on how the characteristics of online reviews (valence, volume, and variance) influence attitudes toward brands is sparse, even though brands are among the most valuable corporate assets and companies use online marketing extensively to increase brand loyalty. Thus, this paper offers a conceptual model that closely examines the relationship between the characteristics of online reviews and brand attitudes. The model contributes to a better understanding of the influence of contextual factors on brand attitudes within online communication. In line with prior research, the study conceptualizes volume and variance as moderators of valence. Furthermore, the proposed conceptual model integrates brand type (functional, emotional, symbolic, and lifestyle) and the source of review (stranger or acquaintance) as potential moderators. Conceptual insights, along with managerial implications for online marketing managers, are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Online reviews refer to negative and positive reviews about brands and/or products. As recommendations, by contrast, solely imply positive reviews (Christodoulides et al. 2012), we use the term “online reviews,” as it suits the aim of this paper.

References

  • Aaker, D. A. (1996). Building strong brands. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, D., Fournier, S., & Brasel, S. A. (2004). When good brands do bad. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adaval, R. (2001). Sometimes it just feels right: The differential weighting of affect-consistent and affect-inconsistent product information. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, R., Gopal, R., Gupta, A., & Singh, H. (2012). Putting money where the mouths are: The relation between venture financing and electronic word-of-mouth. Information Systems Research, 23(1), 976–992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahluwalia, R., & Shiv, B. (2002). How prevalent is the negative effect in consumer environments. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 270–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 27–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2000). Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (pp. 1–33). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E., & Salisbury, L. (2003). The formation of market-level expectations and its covariates. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(1), 115–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archak, N., Ghose, A., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2011). Deriving the pricing power of product features by mining consumer reviews. Management Science, 57(8), 1485–1509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkin, D. (2004). The culting of brands: When customers become true believers. New York: Portfolio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2002). Intentional social action in virtual communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(2), 2–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2006). Antecedents and purchase consequences of customer participation in small group brand communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(1), 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A. M., Donthu, N., & Kumar, V. (2016). Investigating how word-of-mouth conversations about brands influence purchase and retransmission intentions. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(2), 225–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bambauer-Sachse, S., & Mangold, S. (2011). Brand equity dilution through negative online word-of-mouth communication. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18(1), 38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1988). Possession and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (2013). Extended self in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 477–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., & Heath, C. (2007). Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., & Ward, M. K. (2010). Subtle signals of inconspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(4), 555–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, S., & Reddy, S. K. (1998). Symbolic and functional positioning of brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 15(1), 32–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bless, H. (2000). The interplay of affect and cognition: The mediating role of general knowledge structures. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boush, D. M., & Loken, B. (1991). A process-tracing study of brand extension evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(1), 16–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, D., & Narayandas, D. (2001). Managing customer-initiated contacts with manufacturers: The impact of share of category requirements on word-of-mouth behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), 281–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, O. L., & Wicklund, R. A. (1989). Psychological antecedents of conspicuous consumption. Journal of Economic Psychology, 10(2), 161–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breckler, S. J., & Wiggins, E. C. (1989). Affect versus evaluation in the structure of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25(3), 253–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. P., Homer, P. M., & Inman, J. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of relationships between ad-evoked feelings and advertising responses. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(1), 114–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruder, M., Dosmukhambetova, D., & Nerb, J. (2012). Emotional signals in nonverbal interaction: Dyadic facilitation and convergence in expressions, appraisals, and feelings. Cognition and Emotion, 26(3), 480–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunet, P. M., & Schmidt, L. A. (2008). Are shy adults really bolder online? It depends on the context. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(6), 707–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, R., Losow, J. I., Murphy, M. M., & Costanzo, P. (1992). Social facilitation and inhibition of emotional expression and communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), 962–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Q., Duan, W., & Gan, Q. (2011). Exploring determinants of voting for the ‘helpfulness’ of online user reviews: A text mining approach. Decision Support Systems, 50(2), 511–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casalo, L., Flavian, C., Guinaliu, M., & Ekinci, Y. (2015). Avoiding the dark side of positive online consumer reviews: Enhancing reviews' usefulness for high risk-averse travelers. Journal of Business Research, 68(9), 1829–1835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascio, C., O’Donnel, M., Bayer, J., Tinney, F. J., & Falk, E. B. (2015). Neural correlates of susceptibility to group opinions in online word-of-mouth recommendations. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(4), 559–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, A., Liu, Y., & Mazumdar, T. (2010). The differential effects of online word-of-mouth and critics’reviews on pre-release movie evaluation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24(3), 185–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. H., & Wu, L. H. (2014). An examination of negative e-WOM adoption: Brand commitment as a moderator. Decision Support Systems, 59, 206–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., & Lurie, N. H. (2013). Temporal contiguity and negativity bias in the impact of online word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(4), 463–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., & Xie, J. (2008). Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management Science, 54(3), 477–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chintagunta, P. K., Gopinath, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2010). The effects of online user reviews on movie box office performance: Accounting for sequential rollout and aggregation across local markets. Marketing Science, 29(5), 944–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Y. K., Yoon, S., & Lacey, H. P. (2013). Online game characters’ influence on brand trust: Self-disclosure, group membership, and product type. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 996–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christodoulides, G., Michaelidou, N., & Argyriou, E. (2012). Cross-national differences in e-WOM influence. European Journal of Marketing, 46(11/12), 1689–1707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 457–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui, G., Lui, H. K., & Guo, X. (2012). The effect of online consumer reviews on new product sales. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(1), 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czellar, S. (2003). Consumer attitude toward brand extensions: An integrative model and research propositions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20(1), 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R., Piven, I., & Breazeale, M. (2014). Conceptualizing the brand in social media community: The five sources model. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(4), 468–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBono, K., & Harnish, R. (1988). Source expertise, source attractiveness, and the processing of persuasive information: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(4), 541–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellarocas, C., Zhang, X. M., & Awad, N. F. (2007). Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales: The case of motion pictures. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(4), 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolich, I. J. (1969). Congruence relationships between self images and product brands. Journal of Marketing Research, 6(1), 80–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domzal, T. J., & Kernan, J.-B. (1992). Reading advertising: The what and how of product meaning. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 9(3), 48–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drolet, A., & Aaker, J. (2002). Off-target? Changing cognitive-based attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(1), 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffett, R. G. (2015). The influence of Facebook advertising on cognitive attitudes amid generation Y. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), 243–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • East, R., Hammond, K., & Lomax, W. (2008). Measuring the impact of positive and negative word of mouth on brand purchase probability. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(3), 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, K. (1990). The interplay of affect and cognition in attitude formation and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(2), 202–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, K., & von Hippel, W. (1995). Hearts and minds: The priority of affective versus cognitive factors in person perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(10), 996–1011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisingerich, A. B., Chun, H. H., Liu, Y., Jia, H., & Bell, S. J. (2015). Why recommend a brand face-to-face but not on Facebook? How word-of-mouth on online social sites differs from traditional word of mouth. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(1), 120–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2005). Self-construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 378–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabriger, L. R., & Petty, R. E. (1999). The role of affective and cognitive bases of attitudes in susceptibility to affectively and cognitively based persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(3), 363–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Z.-P., Che, Y.-J., & Chen, Z.-Y. (2017). Product sales forecasting using online reviews and historical sales data: A method combining the bass model and sentiment analysis. Journal of Business Research, 74, 90–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior? In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 204–243). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H., & Petty, R. E. (2007). Attitudes: Their structure, function, and consequences. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H., Powell, M. C., & Williams, C. J. (1989). The role of attitude accessibility in the attitude-to-behavior process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 280–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1974). Attitudes toward objects as predictors of single and multiple behavior criteria. Psychological Review, 81(1), 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research reading. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1981). Acceptance, yielding, and impact: Cognitive processes in persuasion. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, & T. C. Brock TC (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, K., Freling, R., Alhoqail, S., Cho, H., & Freling, T. (2014). How online product reviews affect retail sales: A meta-analysis. Journal of Retailing, 90(2), 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folse, J. A., Porter, M. D., Godbole, M. B., & Reynolds, K. E. (2016). The effects of negatively valenced emotional expressions in online reviews on the reviewer, the review, and the product. Psychology and Marketing, 33(9), 747–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gensler, S., Völckner, F., Egger, M., Fischbach, K., & Schoder, D. (2016). Listen to your customers: Insights into brand image using online consumer-generated product reviews. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 20(1), 112–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godes, D., & Mayzlin, D. (2004). Using online conversations to study word of mouth communication. Marketing Science, 23(4), 545–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, J., Oestreicher-Singer, G., & Reichman, S. (2012). The quest for content: How user-generated links can facilitate online exploration. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(4), 452–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruen, T. W., Osmonbekov, T., & Czaplewski, A. J. (2006). eWOM: The impact of costumer-to-customer online know-how exchange on customer value and loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 59(4), 449–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, P., & Harris, J. (2010). How e-WOM recommendations influence product consideration and quality of choice: A motivation to process information perspective. Journal of Business Research, 63(9), 1041–1049.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, S., & Bond, S. (2015). Why is the crowd divided? Attribution for dispersion in online word of mouth. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(6), 1509–1527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 21(1), 107–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., & Kim, J. (1991). Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective source. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 454–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirt, E. R., Melton, R. J., McDonald, H. E., & Harackiewicz, J. W. (1996). Processing goals, task interest, and mood-performance relationship: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 245–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho-Dac, N. N., Carson, S. J., & Moore, W. L. (2013). The effects of positive and negative online customer reviews: Do brand strength and category maturity matter? Journal of Marketing, 77(6), 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., & Vaughan, G. M. (2008). Social psychology. Essex: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, I. B., & Cha, H. S. (2013). The mediating role of consumer trust in an online merchant in predicting purchase intention. International Journal of Information Management, 33(6), 927–939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, C., & Houston, M. J. (1993). Goal-oriented experiences and the development of knowledge. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 190–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, T. L., & Houts, R. (1998). The psychological infrastructure of courtship and marriage: The role of personality and compatibility in romantic relationships. In T. Bradbury (Ed.), The developmental course of marital dysfunction (pp. 114–151). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. (1996). Social identity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez, F. R., & Mendoza, N. A. (2013). Too popular to ignore: The influence of online reviews on purchase intentions of search and experience products. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(3), 226–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(2), 163–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L. (2010). Brand equity management in a multichannel, multimedia retail environment. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24(2), 58–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L. (2016). Reflections on customer-based brand equity: Perspectives, progress, and priorities. AMS Review, 6(1/2), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khare, A., Labrecque, L. I., & Asare, A. K. (2011). The assimilative and contrastive effects of word-of-mouth volume: An experimental examination of online consumer ratings. Journal of Retailing, 87(1), 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiely, J. A. (2005). Emotions in business-to-business service relationships. Service Industries Journal, 25(3), 373–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., & Gupta, P. (2012). Emotional expressions in online user reviews: How they influence consumers' product evaluations. Journal of Business Research, 65(7), 985–992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Naylor, G., Sivadas, E., & Sugamaran, V. (2015). The unrealized value of incentivized eWOM recommendations. Marketing Letters, 27(3), 411–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M., & Daibo, I. (2008). The study of emotional contagion from the perspective of interpersonal relationships. Social Behavior and Personality, 36(1), 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleine, R., Kleine, S. S., & Kernan, J. B. (1993). Mundane consumption and the self. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2(3), 209–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoll, M., & Bronstein, J. (2013). An examination of the information disclosure behavior of infertility bloggers: Patterns of self-disclosure and anonymity. Journal of Information Management, 66(2), 175–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koo, D.-M. (2015). The strength of no tie relationship in an online recommendation: Focused on interactional effects of valence, tie strength, and type of service. European Journal of Marketing, 49(7/8), 1163–1183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostyra, D. S., Reiner, J., Natter, M., & Klapper, D. (2016). Decomposing the effects of online customer reviews on brand, price, and product attributes. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(1), 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronrod, A., & Danziger, S. (2013). “Wii will rock you!” the use and effect of figurative language in consumer reviews of hedonic and utilitarian consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(4), 726–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, D., Lee, A., & Mizerski, R. (2009). The effects of cultural values in word-of-mouth communication. Journal of International Marketing, 17(3), 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langan, R., Besharat, A., & Varki, S. (2017). The effect of review valence and variance on product evaluations: An examination of intrinsic and extrinsic cues. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(2), 414–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, J. H., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208, 1335–1342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. T., & Koo, D.-M. (2012). Effects of attribute and valence of e-WOM on message adoption: Moderating roles of subjective knowledge and regulatory focus. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1974–1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., Haung, L., Tan, C.-H., & Wei, K.-K. (2013). Helpfulness of online product reviews as seen by consumers: Source and content features. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(4), 101–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. (2006). Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 74–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T. C., Wang, C. Y., & Wu, L. W. (2010). Moderators of the negativity effect: Commitment, identification, and consumer sensitivity to corporate social performance. Psychology and Marketing, 27(1), 54–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Burns, A. C., & Hou, Y. (2017). An investigation of brand-related user-generated content on twitter. Journal of Advertising, 46(2), 236–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loken, B., & John, D. R. (1993). Diluting brand beliefs: When do brand extensions have a negative impact? Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, S., Ruyter, K., Friedman, M., Brueggen, E. C., Wetzels, M., & Pfann, G. (2013). More than words: The influence of affective content and linguistic style matches in online reviews on conversion rates. Journal of Marketing, 77(1), 87–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, R. (1975). Changing brand attitudes through modification of cognitive structure. Journal of Consumer Research, 1(4), 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mafael, A., Gottschalk, S. A., & Kreis, H. (2016). Examining biased assimilation of brand-related online reviews. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 36, 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheswaran, D., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1990). The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(3), 361–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, N. (2003). Shifting selves and decision making: The effects of self-construal priming on consumer risk-taking. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(1), 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayzlin, D. (2006). Promotional chat on the internet. Marketing Science, 25(2), 155–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meuter, M. L., McCabe, D. B., & Curran, J. M. (2013). Electronic word-of-mouth versus interpersonal word-of-mouth. Are all forms of word-of-mouth equally influential? Services Marketing Quarterly, 34(3), 240–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, M. G., & Tesser, A. (1986). Effects of affective and cognitive focus on the attitude-behavior relation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 270–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnema, A., Bijmolt, T. H. A., Gensler, S., & Wiesel, T. (2016). To keep or not to keep: Effects of online customer reviews on product returns. Journal of Retailing, 92(3), 253–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, A., & Satish, S. M. (2016). eWOM: Extant research review and future research avenues. Journal for Decision Makers, 41(3), 222–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981). Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude? Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 318–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, W. W., & Schweidel, D. A. (2012). Online product opinions: Incidence, evaluation, and evolution. Marketing Science, 31(3), 372–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. G. (2012). Some things are better left unsaid: How word of mouth influences the storyteller. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 1140–1154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. G. (2015). Attitude predictability and helpfulness in online reviews: The role of explained actions and reactions. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(1), 30–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2010). What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 185–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neelamegham, R., & Chintagunta, P. (1999). A Bayesian model to forecast new product performance in domestic and international markets. Marketing Science, 18(2), 115–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, M., Bin, Y. S., & Campbell, A. (2012). Comparing online and offline self-disclosure: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networks, 15(2), 103–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth, U. R., & De Marchi, R. (2007). Understanding the relationships between functional, symbolic, and experiential brand beliefs, product experiential attributes, and product schema: Advertising-trial interactions revisited. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 15(3), 219–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Shaughnessy, J. (1987). Why people buy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C., & Lee, T. M. (2009). Information direction, web site reputation and e-WOM effect: A moderating role of product type. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J., & MacInnis, D. J. (1986). Strategic brand concept-image management. Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 135–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. W., MacInnis, D. J., Priester, J., Eisingerich, A. B., & Iacobucci, D. (2010). Brand attachment and brand attitude strength: Conceptual and empirical differentiation of two critical brand equity drivers. Journal of Marketing, 74(6), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 123–205). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Matching versus mismatching attitude functions: Implications for scrutiny of persuasive messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(3), 227–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham, M. T. (1998). Representativeness, relevance, and the use of feelings in decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(2), 144–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priester, J. R., Nayakankuppam, D., Fleming, M. A., & Godek, J. (2004). The A2SC2 model: The influence of attitudes and attitude strength on consideration and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(4), 574–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purnawirawan, N., Pelsmacker, P., & Dens, N. (2012). Balance and sequence in online reviews: How perceived usefulness affects attitudes and intentions. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(4), 244–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purnawirawan, N., Eisend, M., De Pelsmacker, P., & Dens, N. (2015). A meta-analytic investigation of the role of valence in online reviews. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 31, 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransbotham, S., Kane, G. C., & Lurie, N. H. (2012). Network characteristics and the value of collaborative user-generated content. Marketing Science, 31(3), 387–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Relling, M., Schnittka, O., Sattler, H., & Johnen, M. (2016). Each can help or hurt: Negative and positive word of mouth in social network brand communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(1), 42–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. (2004). Lovemarks: The future beyond brands. New York: Powerhouse Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosario, A., Sotgiu, F., De Valck, K., & Bijmolt, T. H. A. (2016). The effect of electronic word of mouth on sales: A meta-analytic review of platform, product, and metric factors. Journal of Marketing, 53(3), 297–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, A. G., Alden, L. E., & Paulhus, D. L. (2000). Is acculturation unidimensional or bidimensional? A head-to-head comparison in the prediction of personality, self-identity, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(1), 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salganik, M. J., & Watts, D. J. (2008). Leading the herd astray: An experimental study of self-fulfilling prophecies in an artificial cultural market. Social Psychology Quarterly, 71(4), 338–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller, T. K., & Malhotra, N. K. (2015). Affective and cognitive components of attitudes in high-stakes decisions: An application of the theory of planned behavior to hormone replacement therapy use. Psychology and Marketing, 32(6), 678–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schau, H. J., & Gilly, M. C. (2003). We are what we post? Self-presentation in personal web space. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 385–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, R. M., & Bickart, B. (2005). Published word of mouth: Referable, consumer-generated information on the internet. In C. P. Haugtvedt & K. A. Machleit (Eds.), Online consumer psychology: Understanding and influencing consumer behavior in the virtual world (pp. 32–58). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, R. M., & Bickart, B. (2012). Perceived helpfulness of online consumer reviews: The role of message content and style. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 11(3), 234–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, A. E. (2009). The effect of computer-mediated communication on conformity vs. nonconformity: An impression management perspective. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 374–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Information and motivational function of affective states. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (pp. 527–561). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • See, Y., Petty, R. E., & Fabriger, L. R. (2008). Affective and cognitive meta-bases of attitudes: Unique effects on information interest and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 938–955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., & Lerman, D. (2007). Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the web. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(4), 76–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senecal, S., & Nantel, J. (2004). The influence of online product recommendations on consumers’ online choices. Journal of Retailing, 80(2), 159–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, I., & Rosen, E. (2014). Absolute value: What really influences customers in the age of (nearly) perfect information. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., Menon, S., & Sivakumar, K. (2005). Online peer and editorial recommendations, trust, and choice in virtual markets. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(3), 15–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smoski, M. J., & Bachorowski, J. (2003). Antiphonal laughter between friends and strangers. Cognition and Emotion, 17(2), 327–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, M. R. (1983). The role of products as social stimuli: A symbolic interactionism perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(3), 319–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahilevitz, M., & Meyers, J. G. (1998). Donations to charity as purchase incentives: How well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 434–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., Dong, X., & McIntyre, S. (2017). Motivation of user-generated content: Social connectedness moderates the effects of monetary rewards. Marketing Science, 36(3), 329–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, T., Fang, E., & Wang, F. (2014). Is neutral really neutral? The effects of neutral user-generated content on product sales. Journal of Marketing, 78(4), 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. J., Rindfleisch, A., & Arsel, Z. (2006). Emotional branding and the strategic value of the doppelgänger brand image. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 50–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirunillai, S., & Tellis, G. J. (2012). Does chatter really matter? Dynamics of user-generated content and stock performance. Marketing Science, 31(2), 198–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 310–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., Liu, X., & Fang, E. (2015). User reviews variance, critic reviews variance, and product sales: An exploration of customer breadth and depth effects. Journal of Retailing, 91(3), 372–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicklund, R. A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1981). Symbolic self-completion. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, Q., Law, R., & Gu, B. (2009). The impact of online user reviews on hotel room sales. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28(1), 180–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, D., Bond, S., & Zhang, H. (2014). Anxious or angry? Effects of discrete emotions on the perceived helpfulness of online reviews. MIS Quarterly, 38(2), 539–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ying, Y., Feinberg, F., & Wedel, M. (2006). Leveraging missing ratings to improve online recommendation systems. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 355–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, C. W., Sanders, G. L., & Moon, J. (2013). Exploring the effect of e-WOM participation on e-loyalty in e-commerce. Decision Support Systems, 55(3), 669–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • You, Y., Vadakkepatt, G. G., & Joshi, A. M. (2015). A meta-analysis of electronic word-of-mouth elasticity. Journal of Marketing, 79(2), 19–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Ma, B., & Cartwright, D. K. (2013). The impact of online user reviews on cameras sales. European Journal of Marketing, 47(7), 1115–1128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, F., & Zhang, X. (2010). Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agnieszka Zablocki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zablocki, A., Schlegelmilch, B. & Houston, M.J. How valence, volume and variance of online reviews influence brand attitudes. AMS Rev 9, 61–77 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-018-0123-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-018-0123-1

Keywords

Navigation