Abstract
This study implements the parameterizations of convective and frontal gravity wave drag (GWD) with wide phase speed spectra into a global forecast model with a model top near 0.3 hPa. The new convective GWD scheme replaces the existing one that considers only a stationary convective GW, and the frontal GWD scheme is newly introduced. When the new GWD schemes are used, the Rayleigh friction, applied above 2 hPa to mimic the effects of missing GWD, is removed. The convective (frontal) GWs are generated mainly in the Intertropical Convergence Zone and winter extratropical storm track regions (extratropics where strong baroclinicity exists). The convective and frontal GWD derived from the new schemes are significant near the model top, with maxima of ~2-4 and ~26-58 m s−1 day−1, respectively. The differences in convective GWD between the stationary and non-stationary schemes appear mainly in the tropics and summer hemisphere, where stationary GWs cannot propagate upward. The new schemes improve the seasonal representation of stratospheric wind, through changes in both the GWD and the resolved wave forcing, which is modulated by the changed large-scale wind due to the GWD. The downward influence, in response to the changed GWD, is also positive in the tropospheric fields, such as subtropical jet and planetary-scale disturbances. For the medium-range forecasts, improved skill scores on wind speed are achieved globally with the new schemes. The improvements mostly appear only in the stratosphere during the early forecast period (~3 days) but expand to the troposphere as forecast time increases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bae, S. Y., S.-Y. Hong, and K. S. Lim, 2016: Coupling WRF doublemoment 6-class microphysics schemes to RRTMG radiation scheme in weather research forecasting model. Adv. Meteorol., 2016, 1-11, doi: 10.1155/2016/5070154.
Baek, S., 2017: A revised radiation package of G-packed McICA and twostream approximation: Performance evaluation in a global weather forecasting model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 9, 1628-1640, doi:10. 1002/2017MS000994.
Beres, J. H., 2004: Gravity wave generation by a three-dimensional thermal forcing. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1805-1815.
Charney, J. G., and P. G. Drazin, 1961: Propagation of planetary-scale disturbances from the lower into the upper atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res., 66, 83-109.
Charron, M., and E. Manzini, 2002: Gravity waves from fronts: Parameterization and middle atmosphere response in a general circulation model. J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 923-941.
Choi, H.-J., and H.-Y. Chun, 2011: Momentum flux spectrum of convective gravity waves. Part I: An update of a parameterization using mesoscale simulations. J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 739-759, doi:10.1175/2010-JAS3552.1.
Choi, H.-J., and H.-Y. Chun, 2013: Effects of convective gravity wave drag in the Southern Hemisphere winter stratosphere. J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 2120-2136, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-12-0238.1.
Choi, H.-J., and S.-Y. Hong, 2015: An updated subgrid orographic parameterization for global atmospheric forecast models. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 120, 12445-12457, doi:10.1002/2015JD024230.
Choi, H.-J., S.-J. Choi, M.-S. Koo, J.-E. Kim, Y. C. Kwon, and S.-Y. Hong, 2017: Effects of parameterized orographic drag on weather forecasting and simulated climatology over East Asia during boreal summer. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 122, 10669-10678, doi:10.1002/2017JD026696.
Chun, H.-Y., and J.-J. Baik, 1998: Momentum flux by thermally induced internal gravity waves and its approximation for large-scale models. J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 3299-3310.
Chun, H.-Y., M.-D. Song, J.-W. Kim, and J.-J. Baik, 2001: Effects of gravity wave drag induced by cumulus convection on the atmospheric general circulation. J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 302-319.
Chun, H.-Y., H.-J. Choi, and I.-S. Song, 2008: Effects of nonlinearity on convectively forced internal gravity waves: Application to gravity wave drag parameterization. J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 557-575.
Chun, H.-Y., Y.-H. Kim, H.-J. Choi, and J.-Y. Kim, 2011: Influence of gravity waves in the tropical upwelling: WACCM simulations. J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 2599-2612, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-11-022.1.
Clayton, A. M., A. C. Lorenc, and D. M. Barker, 2013: Operational implementation of a hybrid ensemble/4D-Var global data assimilation system at the Met Ofce. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139, 1445-1461, doi:10.1002/qj.2054.
de la Cámara, A., and F. Lott, 2015: A parameterization of the gravity waves emitted by fronts and jets. Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 2071-2078, doi:10.1002/2015GL063298.
Dee, D. P., and Coauthors, 2011: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553-597, doi:10.1002/qj.828.
Fritts, D. C., and G. D. Nastrom, 1992: Sources of mesoscale variability of gravity waves. Part II: Frontal, convective, and jet stream excitation. J. Atmos. Sci., 49, 111-127.
Han, J.-Y., S.-Y. Hong, K.-S. Lim, and J. Han, 2016: Sensitivity of a cumulus parameterization scheme to precipitation production representation and its impact on a heavy rain event over Korea. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 2125-2135, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-15-0255.1.
Haynes, P. H., M. E. McIntyre, T. G. Shepherd, C. J. Marks, and K. P. Shine, 1991: On the “downward control” of extratropical diabatic circulations by eddy-induced mean zonal forces. J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 651-678.
Holton, J. R., 1982: The role of gravity wave induced drag and diffusion in the momentum budget of the mesosphere. J. Atmos. Sci., 39, 791-799.
Hong, S.-Y., and Coauthors, 2013: The Global/Regional Integrated Model system (GRIMs). Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 49, 219-243, doi:10.1007/s13143-013-0023-0.
Hong, S.-Y., and Coauthors, 2018: The Korean Integrated Model (KIM) System for global weather forecasting (in press). Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, doi:10.1007/s13143-018-0028-9.
Hoskins, B. J., 1982: The mathematical theory of frontogenesis. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 14, 131-151.
Huffman, G. J., and Coauthors, 1997: The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) combined precipitation dataset. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78, 5-20.
Jablonowski C., and D. L. Williamson, 2011: The pros and cons of diffusion, filters and fixers in atmospheric general circulation models. Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci., 80, 381-493, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-11640-7_13.
Jeon, J.-H., S.-Y. Hong, H.-Y. Chun, and I.-S. Song, 2010: Test of a convectively forced gravity wave drag parameterization in a general circulation model. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 1-10, doi:10.1007/s13143-010-0001-8.
Kanamitsu, M., 1989: Description of the NMC global data assimilation and forecast system. Wea. Forecasting, 4, 335-342.
Kanamitsu, M., and Coauthors, 2002: NCEP dynamical seasonal forecast system 2000. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 83, 1019-1038.
Kang, M.-J., H.-Y. Chun, and Y.-H. Kim, 2017: Momentum flux of convective gravity waves derived from an offline gravity wave parameterization. Part I: Spatiotemporal variations at source level. J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 3167-3189, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-17-0053.1.
Kim, Y.-J., S. D. Eckermann, and H.-Y. Chun, 2003: An overview of the past, present and future of gravity-wave drag parameterization for numerical climate and weather prediction models. Atmos.-Ocean, 41, 65-98.
Koo, M.-S., S. Baek, K.-H. Seol, and K. Cho, 2017: Advances in land modeling of KIAPS based on the Noah Land Surface Model. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 361-373, doi:10.1007/s13143-017-0043-2.
Kwon, Y. C., and S.-Y. Hong, 2017: A mass-flux cumulus parameterization scheme across gray-zone resolutions. Mon. Wea. Rev., 145, 583-598, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-16-0034.1.
Lindzen, R. S., 1981: Turbulence and stress owing to gravity wave and tidal breakdown. J. Geophys. Res., 86, 9707-9714.
Manzini, E., and N. A. McFarlane, 1998: The effect of varying the source spectrum of a gravity wave parameterization in a middle atmosphere general circulation model. J. Geophys. Res., 103, 31523-31539.
McFarlane, N. A., 1987: The effect of orographically excited gravity wave drag on the general circulation of the lower stratosphere and troposphere. J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 1775-1800.
Miller, J. E., 1948: On the concept of frontogenesis. J. Meteor., 5, 169-171.
Orr, A., P. Bechtold, J. Scinocca, M. Ern, and M. Janiskova, 2010: Improved middle atmosphere climate and forecasts in the ECMWF model through a nonorographic gravity wave drag parameterization. J. Climate, 23, 5905-5926, doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3490.1.
Park, R.-S., J.-H. Chae, and S.-Y. Hong, 2016: A revised prognostic cloud fraction scheme in a global forecasting system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 1219-1229, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-15-0273.1.
Richter, J. H., F. Sassi, and R. R. Garcia, 2010: Toward a physically based gravity wave source parameterization in a general circulation model. J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 136-156, doi:10.1175/2009JAS3112.1.
Richter, J. H., A. Solomon., and J. T. Bacmeister, 2014: Effects of vertical resolution and nonorographic gravity wave drag on the simulated climate in the Community Atmosphere Model, version 5. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 6, 357-383, doi:10.1002/2013MS000303.
Scinocca, J. F., 2003: An accurate spectral nonorographic gravity wave drag parameterization for general circulation models. J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 667-682.
Shaw, T. A., and T. G. Shepherd, 2007: Angular momentum conservation and gravity wave drag parameterization: Implications for climate models. J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 190-203.
Shepherd, T. G., and T. A. Shaw, 2004: The angular momentum constraint on climate sensitivity and downward influence in the middle atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 2899-2908.
Shepherd, T. G., K. Semeniuk, and J. N. Koshyk, 1996: Sponge layer feedbacks in middle-atmosphere models. J. Geophys. Res., 101, 23447-23464.
Shin, H. H., and S.-Y. Hong, 2015: Representation of the subgrid-scale turbulent transport in convective boundary layers at gray-zone resolutions. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 250-271, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-14-00116.1.
Song, I.-S., and H.-Y. Chun, 2005: Momentum flux spectrum of convectively forced internal gravity waves and its application to gravity wave drag parameterization. Part I: Theory. J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 107-124.
Song, I.-S., and H.-Y. Chun, 2008: A Lagrangian spectral parameterization of gravity wave drag induced by cumulus convection. J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 1204-1224.
Song, I.-S., H.-Y. Chun, R. R. Garcia, and B. A. Boville, 2007: Momentum flux spectrum of convectively forced internal gravity waves and its application to gravity wave drag parameterization. Part II: Impacts in a GCM (WACCM). J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 2286-2308.
Warner, C. D., and M. E. McIntyre, 2001: An ultrasimple spectral parameterization for nonorographic gravity waves. J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 1837-1857.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choi, HJ., Han, JY., Koo, MS. et al. Effects of Non-orographic Gravity Wave Drag on Seasonal and Medium-range Predictions in a Global Forecast Model. Asia-Pacific J Atmos Sci 54 (Suppl 1), 385–402 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-018-0023-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-018-0023-1