Abstract
This paper aims to investigate a modified version of the environmental Kuznets curve by including human development and governance as a macroeconomics determinant of sustainability. For this purpose, our study uses the Johansen panel cointegration testing to verify the existence of long-run relationships and we employed the fixed effects models which founded on the panel-based error correction ones using data for 26 African countries over the period 1990–2013. Our findings highlight that there exists a quadratic relationship among the negative genuine saving (GS−) and the human development variable. This implies that the assumed EKC hypothesis is verified for the modified version of EKC. The empirical evidence records the fact that the ecological issue in the Millennium Development Goals background is deeply influenced by the sustainability aspects. Further, our findings recommended that African countries should take seriously the human aspect. Further, the academic researchers, policymakers, and international organizations should unify around a specific and clear definition of the sustainability notion to reach a verdict consensus about his measure and the way of computing by taking into consideration the diversity and the specificities of each region.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For an extensive literature on the EKC hypothesis, see for example Tiba and Omri (2016).
Genuine saving index (also called the adjusted net saving) is a sustainability measure constructed around the notions of green national accounts. Genuine saving ratio computes the real rate of savings in an economy after taking into consideration the natural resources depletion, pollution damage, and human capital investment (World Bank, 2014).
References
Ahmed, K., & Long, W. (2012). Environmental Kuznets curve and Pakistan: an empirical analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance, 1, 4–13.
Ahmed, K., & Long, W. (2013). An empirical analysis of CO2 emission in Pakistan using EKC hypothesis. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 12, 188–200.
Akbostanci, E., Türüt-AsIk, S., & Tunç, G. I. (2009). The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: is there an environmental Kuznets curve? Energy Policy, 37, 861–867.
Alam, M. J., Begum, I. A., Buysse, J., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2012). Energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth nexus in Bangladesh: cointegration and dynamic causality analysis. Energy Policy, 45, 217–225.
Al-mulali, U., & Sheau-ting, L. (2014). Econometric analysis of trade, exports, imports, energy consumption and CO2 emissions in six regions. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 33, 484–498.
Anand, S., & Sen, A. (2000). Human development and economic sustainability. World Dev, 28, 2029–2049.
Ang, J. B. (2007). CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy, 35, 4772–4778.
Ang, J. B. (2008). Economic development, pollutant emissions and energy consumption in Malaysia. J Policy Model, 30, 271–278.
Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2009). CO2 emissions, energy usage, and output in Central America. Energy Policy, 37, 3282–3286.
Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2014). Renewable energy, output, CO2 emissions, and fossil fuel prices in Central America: evidence from a non linear panel smooth transition vector error correction model. Energy Econ, 42, 226–232.
Arouri, M. H., Ben Youssef, A., M’henni, H., & Rault, C. (2012). Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in Middle East and North African countries. Energy Policy, 45, 342–349.
Atici, C. (2009). Carbon emissions in central and Eastern Europe: environmental Kuznets curve and implications for sustainable development. Sustain Dev, 17, 155–160.
Babu, S. S., & Datta, S. K. (2013). The relevance of environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) in a framework of broad-based environmental degradation and modified measure of growth – a pooled data analysis. Int J Sust Dev World, 20, 309–316.
Baek, J., & Kim, H. S. (2013). Is economic growth good or bad for the environment? Empirical evidence from Korea. Energy Econ, 36, 744–749.
Ben Jebli, M., & Ben Youssef, S. (2015). The environmental Kuznets curve, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy, and trade in Tunisia. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 47, 173–185.
Ben Jebli, M., Ben Youssef, S., & Ozturk, I. (2016). Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries. Ecol Indic, 60, 824–831.
Bölük, G., & Mert, M. (2015). The renewable energy, growth and environmental Kuznets curve in Turkey: an ARDL approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 52, 587–595.
Breitung, J., 2001. The local power of some unit root tests for panel data, in: Baltagi B.H., Fomby, T.B., Hill, R.C. (Eds.), Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels (Adv Econ, Vol.15). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, United Kingdom, pp. 161–177.
Chandran, V. G. R., & Tang, C. F. (2013). The impacts of transport energy consumption, foreign direct investment and income on CO2 emissions in ASEAN-5 economies. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 24, 445–453.
Cho, C. H., Chu, Y. P., & Yang, H. Y. (2014). An environment Kuznets curve for GHG emissions: a panel cointegration analysis. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 9, 120–129.
Chow, G. C. (2014). Environmental Kuznets curve: conclusive econometric evidence for CO2. Pac Econ Rev, 19, 1–7.
Coondoo, D., & Dinda, S. (2002). Causality between income and emission: a country group-specific econometric analysis. Ecol Econ, 40, 351–367.
Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (1994). North-south trade and the environment. Q J Econ, 109, 755–787.
Costantini, V., & Liberati, P. (2014). Technology transfer, institutions and development. Technol Forecast Soc Chang, 88, 26–48.
Costantini, V., & Martini, C. (2010). A modified environmental Kuznets curve for sustainable development assessment using panel data. Int J Glob Environ Issues, 10, 84–122.
Costantini, V., & Monni, S. (2008). Environment, human development, and economic development. Ecol Econ, 64, 867–880.
Cowan, W. N., Chang, T., Inglesi-Lotz, R., & Gupta, R. (2013). The nexus of electricity consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in the BRICS countries. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.081i.
Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., Wang, H., & Wheeler, D. (2002). Confronting the environment Kuznets curve. J Econ Perspect, 16, 147–168.
Du, L., Wei, C., & Cai, S. (2012). Economic development and carbon dioxide emissions in China: provincial panel data analysis. China Econ Rev, 23, 371–384.
Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55, 251–276.
Esteve, V., & Tamarit, C. (2012). Threshold cointegration and non linear adjustment between CO2 and income: the environmental Kuznets curve in Spain,1857– 2007. Energy Econ, 34(6), 2148–2156.
Farhani, S., Chaibi, A., & Rault, C. (2014a). CO2 emissions, output, energy consumption, and trade in Tunisia. Econ Model, 38, 426–434.
Farhani, S., Mrizak, S., Chaibi, A., & Rault, C. (2014b). The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainability: a panel data analysis. Energy Policy, 71, 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.030.
Farhani, S., Shahbaz, M., Sbia, R., & Chaibi, A. (2014c). What does MENA region initially need: grow output or mitigate CO2 emissions? Econ Model, 38, 270–281.
Fodha, M., & Zaghdoud, O. (2010). Economic growth and environmental degradation in Tunisia: an empirical analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy, 38, 1150–1156.
Fosten, J., Morley, B., & Taylor, T. (2012). Dynamic misspecification in the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from CO2 and SO2 emissions in the United Kingdom. Ecol Econ, 76, 25–33.
Franklin, R., & Ruth, M. (2012). Growing up and cleaning up: the environmental Kuznets curve redux. Appl Geogr, 32(1), 29–39.
Friedl, B., & Getzner, M. (2003). Determinants of CO2 emissions in a small open economy. Ecol Econ, 45, 133–148.
Ghosh, S. (2010). Examining carbon emissions economic growth nexus for India: a multivariate cointegration approach. Energy Policy, 38, 3008–3014.
Giovanis, E. (2013). Environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from the British Household Panel Survey. Econ Model, 30, 602–611.
Govindaraju, V. G. R. C., & Foon Tang, C. (2013). The dynamic links between CO2 emissions, economic growth and coal consumption in China and India. Appl Energy, 104, 310–318.
Granger, C. (1988). Some recent development in the concept of causality. J Econ, 39, 199–211.
Grossman, G.M., Krueger, A.B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. National Bureau of economic research working paper 3914, NBER, Cambridge MA.
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ, 110, 353–378.
Gürlük, S. (2009). Economic growth, industrial pollution and human development in the Mediterranean region. Ecol Econ, 68, 2327–2335.
Halicioglu, F. (2009). An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy, 37, 1156–1164.
Hamit-Haggar, M. (2012). Greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: a panel cointegration analysis from Canadian industrial sector perspective. Energy Econ, 34, 358–364.
He, J., & Richard, P. (2010). Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 in Canada. Ecol Econ, 69, 1083–1093.
Hodge, T. (1997). Towards a conceptual framework for assessing progress towards sustainability. Soc Indic Res, 40, 5–98.
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ, 115, 53–74.
Iwata, H., Okada, K., & Samreth, S. (2010). Empirical study on the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 in France: the role of nuclear energy. Energy Policy, 38, 4057–4063.
Iwata, H., Okada, K., & Samreth, S. (2011). A note on the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2: a pooled mean group approach. Appl Energy, 88, 1986–1996.
Iwata, H., Okada, K., & Samreth, S. (2012). Empirical study on the determinants of CO2 emissions: evidence from OECD countries. Appl Econ, 44, 3513–3519.
Jalil, A., & Feridun, M. (2011). The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: a cointegration analysis. Energy Econ, 33, 284–291.
Jalil, A., & Mahmud, S. F. (2009). Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a co-integration analysis for China. Energy Policy, 3, 5167–5172.
Jaunky, V. C. (2011). The CO2 emissions-income nexus: evidence from rich countries. Energy Policy, 39(3), 1228–1240.
Jayanthakumaran, K., Verma, R., & Liu, Y. (2012). CO2 emissions, energy consumption, trade and income: a comparative analysis of China and India. Energy Policy, 42, 450–460.
Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica, 59(6), 1551–1580.
Kaufman, D., Kraay, A., Mastruzzi, M., (2003). Governance matters III: governance indicators for 1996–2002. Policy Res. Work. Pap. No. 3106.
Kivyiro, P., & Arminen, H. (2014). Carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and foreign direct investment: causality analysis for sub-Saharan Africa. Energy, 74, 595–606.
Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev, 45, 1–28.
Lau, L. S., Choong, C. K., & Eng, Y. K. (2014). Carbon dioxide emission, institutional quality, and economic growth: empirical evidence in Malaysia. Renew Energy, 68, 276–281.
Lee, C. C., & Lee, J. D. (2009). Income and CO2 emissions: evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests. Energy Policy, 37, 413–423.
Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties. J Econ, 108, 1–24.
Machado, G.V. (2000). Energy use, C02 emissions and foreign trade: an input-output approach applied to the Brazilian case. Paper presented at the 13th Conference on Input Output Technique, Italy, August 21-25.
Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxf Bull Econ Stat, 61, 631–652.
Martinez-Zarzoso, I., & Begochea-Morancho, A. (2004). Pooled mean group estimation of an environmental Kuznets curve for CO2. Econ Lett, 82, 121–126.
Mensah, J. T. (2014). Carbon emissions, energy consumption and output: a threshold analysis on the causal dynamics in emerging African economies. Energy Policy, 70, 172–182.
Nasir, M., & Rehman, F. R. (2011). Environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Pakistan: an empirical investigation. Energy Policy, 39, 1857–1864.
Onafowora, O. A., & Owoye, O. (2014). Bounds testing approach to analysis of the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis. Energy Econ, 44, 47–62.
Orubu, O., & Omotor, D. G. (2011). Environmental quality and economic growth: searching for environmental Kuznets curves for air and water pollutants in Africa. Energy Policy, 39, 4178–4188.
Osabuohien, E. S., Efobi, U. R., & Gitau, C. M. W. (2014). Beyond the environmental Kuznets curve in Africa: evidence from panel cointegration. J Environ Policy Plan, 16, 517–538.
Ozturk, I., & Acaravci, A. (2010). CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in Turkey. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 14, 3220–3225.
Ozturk, I., & Acaravci, A. (2013). The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Econ, 36, 262–267.
Pao, H. T., & Tsai, C. M. (2010). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRIC countries. Energy Policy, 38, 7850–7860.
Pao, H. T., & Tsai, C. M. (2011a). Multivariate Granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries. Energy, 36, 685–693.
Pao, H. T., & Tsai, C. M. (2011b). Modeling and forecasting the CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in Brazil. Energy, 36, 2450–2458.
Pao, H. T., Yu, H. C., & Yang, Y. H. (2011). Modeling the CO2 emissions, energy use, and economic growth in Russia. Energy, 36, 5094–5100.
Saboori, B., & Sulaiman, J. (2013a). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries: a cointegration approach. Energy, 55, 813–822.
Saboori, B., & Sulaiman, J. (2013b). Environmental degradation, economic growth and energy consumption: evidence of the environmental Kuznets curve in Malaysia. Energy Policy, 60, 892–905.
Saboori, B., Sulaiman, J., & Mohd, S. (2012). Economic growth and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: a co-integration analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy, 51, 184–191.
Sahli, I., & Ben Rejeb, J. (2015). The environmental Kuznets curve and corruption in the Mena region. Procedia Soc Behav Sci, 195, 1648–1657.
Sen, A., (1988). The concept of development, in Hollis Chenery and Thirukodikaval N. Srinivasan (eds), Handbook of Development Economics 1, North Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers, 10–26.
Sen, A., (2000). Social exclusion: concept, application, and scrutiny. Master of Trinity College, Cambridge, and Lamont University Professor Emeritus, Harvard University.
Shahbaz, M., Lean, H. H., & Shabbir, M. S. (2012). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Pakistan: cointegration and Granger causality. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 16, 2947–2953.
Shahbaz, M., Tiwari, A. K., & Nasir, M. (2013a). The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa. Energy Policy, 61, 1452–1459.
Shahbaz, M., Ozturk, I., Afza, T., & Ali, A. (2013b). Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve in a global economy. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 25, 494–502.
Shahbaz, M., Mutascu, M., & Azim, P. (2013c). Environmental Kuznets curve in Romania and the role of energy consumption. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 18, 165–173.
Shahbaz, M., Khraief, N., Uddin, G.S., Ozturk, I., 2014. Environmental Kuznets curve in an open economy: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Tunisia. 34, 325–336.
Siddiqui, D. A., & Ahmed, Q. M. (2013). The effect of institutions on economic growth: a global analysis based on GMM dynamic panel estimation. Struct Chang Econ Dyn, 24, 18–33.
Sulaiman, J., Azman, A., & Saboori, B. (2013). The potential of renewable energy: using the environmental Kuznets curve model. Am J Environ Sci, 9, 103–112.
Tiba, S., & Omri, A. (2016). Literature survey on the relationships between energy, environment and economic growth. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 69, 1129–1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.113.
Tiba, S., Omri, A., & Frikha, M. (2015). The four-way linkages between renewable energy, environmental quality, trade and economic growth: a comparative analysis between high and middle-income countries. Energy Systems, 7, 103–144.
Tiwari, A. K., Shahbaz, M., & Hye, Q. M. A. (2013). The environmental Kuznets curve and the role of coal consumption in India: cointegration and causality analysis in an open economy. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 18, 519–527.
Ul Haq, M. (1995). Reflections on human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
UNDP. (2011). Human development reports indices and data. Available at http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/
Wang, Y., Kang, L., Wu, X., & Xiao, Y. (2013). Estimating the environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint at the global level: a spatial econometric approach. Ecol Indic, 34, 15–21.
World Bank, (2014).World development indicators. Available at http://www.worldbank.org/data/on line data bases/ on linedatabases.html.
Yang, Z., & Zhao, Y. (2014). Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in India: evidence from directed acyclic graphs. Econ Model, 38, 533–540.
Yavuz, N. Ç. (2014). CO2 emission, energy consumption, and economic growth for Turkey: evidence from a cointegration test with a structural break. Energy Sources Part B: Econ Plan Policy, 9(3), 229–235.
Zilio, M., & Recalde, M. (2011). GDP and environment pressure: the role of energy in Latin America and the Caribbean. Energy Policy, 39, 7941–7949.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tiba, S., Frikha, M. EKC and Macroeconomics Aspects of Well-being: a Critical Vision for a Sustainable Future. J Knowl Econ 11, 1171–1197 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-019-00600-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-019-00600-9