Radiologic Cerebral Reperfusion at 24 h Predicts Good Clinical Outcome
Cerebral reperfusion and arterial recanalization are radiological features of the effectiveness of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. Here, an investigation of the prognostic role of early recanalization/reperfusion on clinical outcome was performed. In AIS patients (n = 55), baseline computerized tomography (CT) was performed ≤ 8 h from symptom onset, whereas CT determination of reperfusion/recanalization was assessed at 24 h. Multiple linear and logistic regression models were used to correlate reperfusion/recanalization with radiological (i.e., hemorrhagic transformation, ischemic core, and penumbra volumes) and clinical outcomes (assessed as National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] reduction ≥ 8 points or a NIHSS ≤ 1 at 24 h and as modified Rankin Scale [mRS] < 2 at 90 days). At 24 h, patients achieving radiological reperfusion were n = 24, while the non-reperfused were n = 31. Among non-reperfused, n = 15 patients were recanalized. Radiological reperfusion vs. recanalization was also confirmed by early increased levels of circulating inflammatory biomarkers (i.e., serum osteopontin). In multivariate analysis, ischemic lesion volume reduction was associated with both recanalization (β = 0.265; p = 0.014) and reperfusion (β = 0.461; p < 0.001), but only reperfusion was independently associated with final infarct volume (β = − 0.333; p = 0.007). Only radiological reperfusion at 24 h predicted good clinical response at day 1 (adjusted OR 16.054 [1.423–181.158]; p = 0.025) and 90-day good functional outcome (adjusted OR 25.801 [1.483–448.840]; p = 0.026). At ROC curve analysis the AUC of reperfusion was 0.777 (p < 0.001) for the good clinical response at 24 h and 0.792 (p < 0.001) for 90-day clinical outcome. Twenty-four-hour radiological reperfusion assessed by CT is associated with good clinical response on day 1 and good functional outcome on day 90 in patients with ischemic stroke.
KeywordsIschemic stroke Reperfusion Recanalization Ischemic core Penumbra Inflammation
Analysis and interpretation of data were supported by a grant from the European Commission to Prof F. Mach (FP7-INNOVATION I HEALTH-F2-2013-602114.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
- 2.Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, et al. 2018 guidelines for the early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018;49(3):e46–e110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.El Amki M, Wegener S. Improving cerebral blood flow after arterial recanalization: a novel therapeutic strategy in stroke. Int J Mol Sci 2017; 18(12).Google Scholar
- 5.Iglesias-Rey R, Rodriguez-Yanez M, Rodriguez-Castro E, et al. Worse outcome in stroke patients treated with rt-PA without early reperfusion: associated factors. Transl Stroke Res. 2017.Google Scholar
- 14.Powers WJ, Derdeyn CP, Biller J, Coffey CS, Hoh BL, Jauch EC, et al. American Heart Association/American Stroke Association focused update of the 2013 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke regarding endovascular treatment: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015;46(10):3020–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Cho TH, Nighoghossian N, Mikkelsen IK, Derex L, Hermier M, Pedraza S, Fiehler J, Østergaard L, Berthezène Y, Baron JC: Reperfusion within 6 hours outperforms recanalization in predicting penumbra salvage, lesion growth, final infarct, and clinical outcome Stroke 2015, 46(6):1582–1589.Google Scholar
- 42.Dankbaar JW, Horsch AD, van den Hoven AF, Kappelle LJ, van der Schaaf I, van Seeters T, et al. Prediction of clinical outcome after acute ischemic stroke: the value of repeated noncontrast computed tomography, computed tomographic angiography, and computed tomographic perfusion. Stroke. 2017;48(9):2593–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 45.Suezawa C, Kusachi S, Murakami T, Toeda K, Hirohata S, Nakamura K, et al. Time-dependent changes in plasma osteopontin levels in patients with anterior-wall acute myocardial infarction after successful reperfusion: correlation with left-ventricular volume and function. J Lab Clin Med. 2005;145(1):33–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 53.Padroni M, Bernardoni A, Tamborino C, Roversi G, Borrelli M, Saletti A, et al. Cerebral blood volume ASPECTS is the best predictor of clinical outcome in acute ischemic stroke: a retrospective, combined semi-quantitative and quantitative assessment. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0147910.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar