Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ultrasonographical Features Associated with Progression of Atherosclerosis in Patients with Moderate Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Translational Stroke Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carotid artery stenosis (CAS) is a leading cause of ischemic stroke. Plaque stabilization is a major management approach. Information about the ultrasonographical and clinical features associated with the progression of moderate internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (50–69%) could assist with prognostication and risk factor modifications. We evaluated 287 patients with moderate ICA stenosis (50–69%) and subsequently evaluated them at follow-up points at 12, 24, and 36 months. Patients were divided into three groups according to the degree of ICA stenosis: progression (70–99%, n = 48), stable (50–69%, n = 210), and regression (< 50%, n = 29). Responsible plaque thickness (RPT) across groups during follow-up was compared using a repeated measure ANOVA test. An ordinal regression was subsequently applied to identify risk factors for atherosclerosis progression. Male (P = 0.04), hypoechoic plaque (P < 0.01), smoking (P = 0.02), plaque ulceration (P = 0.05), and contralateral severe CAS or occlusions (P = 0.04) on ultrasound was more frequent in the progression group vs. other two groups. The ordinal regression revealed that only hypoechoic plaque (OR, 7.03; 95% CI, 3.34–14.81; P < 0.01) and contralateral ICA severe stenosis or occlusion (OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.41–5.80; P < 0.01) were independently associated with stenosis progression, while statin use was inversely associated with stenosis progression (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13–0.54; P < 0.01). Of note, symptomatic vs. asymptomatic moderate CAS at baseline was not associated with progression. For patients with moderate CAS, hypoechoic plaque, contralateral severe stenosis or occlusion on ultrasonography, and statin use are independently related to stenosis progression. Statin use may delay the progression of carotid stenosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang YJ, Zhang SM, Zhang L, Wang CX, Dong Q, Gao S, et al. Chinese guidelines for the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack 2010. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2012;18(2):93–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-5949.2011.00290.x.

  2. Tsai CF, Thomas B, Sudlow CL. Epidemiology of stroke and its subtypes in Chinese vs white populations: a systematic review. Neurology. 2013;81(3):264–72. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31829bfde3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Nicolaides AN, Kakkos S, Griffin M, Sabetai M, Dhanjil S, Tegos T, et al. Severity of asymptomatic carotid stenosis and risk of ipsilateral hemispheric ischaemic events: results from the ACSRS study. EJVES. 2005;30(3):275–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.04.031.

  4. Rajebi MR, Benenati MJ, Schernthaner MB, Walker G, Gandhi RT, Pena CS, et al. Reliability and accuracy of simple visual estimation in assessment of peripheral arterial stenosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;26(6):890–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2015.02.018.

  5. Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, Alexandrov AV, Baker JD, Bluth EI, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: grayscale and Doppler ultrasound diagnosis—Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference. Ultrasound Q. 2003;19(4):190–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00013644-200312000-00005.

  6. AbuRahma AF, Robinson PA, Strickler DL, Alberts S, Young L. Proposed new duplex classification for threshold stenoses used in various symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy trials. Ann Vasc Surg. 1998;12(4):349–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100169900166.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kakkos SK, Griffin MB, Nicolaides AN, Kyriacou E, Sabetai MM, Tegos T, et al. The size of juxtaluminal hypoechoic area in ultrasound images of asymptomatic carotid plaques predicts the occurrence of stroke. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57(3):609–18.e1. discussion 17–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. David S, Michael E, Maria D. Carotid plaque area: a tool for targeting and evaluating vascular preventive therapy. Stroke. 2002;33:2916–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nicolaides A, Kakkos S, Griffin M, Sabetai M, Dhanjil S, Tegos T, et al. Severity of asymptomatic carotid stenosis and risk of ipsilateral hemispheric ischaemic events: results from the ACSRS study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;30(3):275–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.04.031.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Geroulakos G, Ramaswami G, Nicolaides A, James K, Labropoulos N, Belcaro G, et al. Characterization of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid plaques using high-resolution real-time ultrasonography. Br J Surg. 1993;80(10):1274–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800801016.

  11. Muraki M, Mikami T, Yoshimoto T, Fujimoto S, Tokuda K, Kaneko S, et al. New criteria for the sonographic diagnosis of a plaque ulcer in the extracranial carotid artery. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(5):1161–6. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7018.

  12. Russell DA, Wijeyaratne SM, Gough MJ. Relationship of carotid plaque echomorphology to presenting symptom. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery: the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. 2010;39(2):134–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.11.003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Giannakopoulos TG, Moulakakis K, Sfyroeras GS, Avgerinos ED, Antonopoulos CN, Kakisis JD, et al. Association between plaque echogenicity and embolic material captured in filter during protected carotid angioplasty and stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;43(6):627–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.03.004.

  14. Gray-Weale AC, Graham JC, Burnett JR, Byrne K, Lusby RJ. Carotid artery atheroma: comparison of preoperative B-mode ultrasound appearance with carotid endarterectomy specimen pathology. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1988;29(6):676–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dickson BC, Gotlieb AI. Towards understanding acute destabilization of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2003;12(5):237–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-8807(03)00072-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moreno PR, Purushothaman KR, Sirol M, Levy AP, Fuster V. Neovascularization in human atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2006;113(18):2245–52. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.578955.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eliasziw M, Streifler JY, Fox AJ, Hachinski VC, Ferguson GG, Barnett HJ. Significance of plaque ulceration in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Stroke. 1994;25(2):304–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.25.2.304.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fisher M, Paganini-Hill A, Martin A, Cosgrove M, Toole JF, Barnett HJ, et al. Carotid plaque pathology: thrombosis, ulceration, and stroke pathogenesis. Stroke. 2005;36(2):253–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000152336.71224.21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Madani A, Beletsky V, Tamayo A, Munoz C, Spence JD. High-risk asymptomatic carotid stenosis: ulceration on 3D ultrasound vs TCD microemboli. Neurology. 2011;77(8):744–50. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822b0090.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuk M, Wannarong T, Beletsky V, Parraga G, Fenster A, Spence JD. Volume of carotid artery ulceration as a predictor of cardiovascular events. Stroke. 2014;45(5):1437–41. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Muluk SC, Muluk VS, Sugimoto H, Rhee RY, Trachtenberg J, Steed DL, et al. Progression of asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a natural history study in 1004 patients. J Vasc Surg. 1999;29(2):208–14. discussion 14–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gerediaga GD, Elizagaray E, Canto-Morereira N, Albuquerque C, Branco R, Beirão I, et al. Contralateral occlusion of the internal carotid artery in the study of carotid stenosis using Doppler ultrasonography. Rev Neurol. 2009;48(8):406–11.

  23. Li ZY, Tang T, U-King-Im J, Graves M, Sutcliffe M, Gillard JH. Assessment of carotid plaque vulnerability using structural and geometrical determinants. Circ J. 2008;72(7):1092–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Taylor F, Huffman MD, Macedo AF, Moore TH, Burke M, Davey SG, et al. Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;31(1):CD004816.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Artom N, Montecucco F, Dallegri F, Pende A. Carotid atherosclerotic plaque stenosis: the stabilizing role of statins. Eur J Clin Investig. 2014;44(11):1122–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12340.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Amarenco P, Bogousslavsky J, Callahan A, Goldstein LB, Hennerici M, Rudolph AE, et al. High-dose atorvastatin after stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(6):549–59. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa061894.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sabeti S, Schlager O, Exner M, Mlekusch W, Amighi J, Dick P, et al. Progression of carotid stenosis detected by duplex ultrasonography predicts adverse outcomes in cardiovascular high-risk patients. Stroke. 2007;38(11):2887–94. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.488387.

  28. Conrad MF, Boulom V, Mukhopadhyay S, Garg A, Patel VI, Cambria RP. Progression of asymptomatic carotid stenosis despite optimal medical therapy. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58(1):128–35.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Brinjikji W, Rabinstein AA, Lanzino G, Murad MH, Williamson EE, DeMarco JK, et al. Ultrasound characteristics of symptomatic carotid plaques: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;40(3–4):165–74. https://doi.org/10.1159/000437339.

  30. Jiang B, Wang WZ, Chen H, Hong Z, Yang QD, SP W, et al. Incidence and trends of stroke and its subtypes in China: results from three large cities. Stroke. 2006;37(1):63–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000194955.34820.78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Appelros P, Stegmayr B, Terent A. Sex differences in stroke epidemiology: a systematic review. Stroke. 2009;40(4):1082–90. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.540781.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Forrest Lowe for his generous comments on the language contents of this manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by “The Special Funding for Beijing Capital Health, Research and Development; 2011-2001-02” that was awarded to Dr. Yang Hua.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Hua.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Yumei Liu declares no conflict of interest. Yang Hua received research grants from “The Special Funding for Beijing Capital Health, Research and Development; 2011-2001-02”. Ran Liu declares no conflict of interest. Lili Wang declares no conflict of interest. Chun Duan declares no conflict of interest. Chen Ling declares no conflict of interest. Xiaoguang Wu declares no conflict of interest. Ovbiagele Bruce receives research grants from NIH, but has no conflict of interest. Wuwei Feng receives research grants from NIH, but has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Hua, Y., Liu, R. et al. Ultrasonographical Features Associated with Progression of Atherosclerosis in Patients with Moderate Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis. Transl. Stroke Res. 9, 375–381 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-017-0592-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-017-0592-9

Keywords

Navigation