Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Delirium is associated with higher mortality in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: systemic review and meta-analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Post-operative delirium (POD) has been recognized as an independent risk factor for mortality. Recent studies suggest that POD is associated with higher mortality rates in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature has not been performed. This study assessed the association between POD and TAVR by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to April 2018. Included studies were prospective or retrospective cohort studies that compared mortality among patients undergoing TAVR both with and without POD. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird to calculate risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Seven studies consisting of 20,086 subjects undergoing TAVR (1517 with POD and 18,569 without POD) were included in this meta-analysis. POD demonstrated a trend towards higher all-cause mortality (pooled odd ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval 0.98–2.37, p = 0.062, I2 = 72%). POD was associated with a significant increased long-term mortality (pooled odd ratio 2.11, 95% confidence interval 1.21–3.68, p = 0.009, I2 = 62.5%). POD was associated with an increased risk of long-term all-cause mortality in patients undergoing TAVR. Our study suggests POD could be a potential risk factor of mortality among patients undergoing TAVR. Further studies implementing preventative and treatment strategies against delirium and its effect on POD and its associated mortality are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AS:

Aortic stenosis

CAM-ICU:

Confusion assessment method for the ICU

CHART-DEL:

Chart abstraction for delirium during hospitalization

CI:

Confidence interval

DSM-IV:

Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder IV

EuroSCORE:

European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation

ICD:

International statistical classification of disease and related health problem

GA:

Generalized anesthesia

LA:

Localized anesthesia

NA:

Not available

OR:

Odds ratio

POD:

Post-operative delirium

SAVR:

Surgical aortic valvular replacement

STS:

Society of thoracic surgery

TAVR:

Transcatheter aortic valvular replacement

References

  1. Rodes-Cabau J. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current and future approaches. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;9(1):15–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(17):1597–607.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kodali SK, Williams MR, Smith CR, et al. Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(18):1686–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(23):2187–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mack MJ, Leon MB, Smith CR, et al. 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9986):2477–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Deeb GM, Reardon MJ, Chetcuti S, et al. 3-year outcomes in high-risk patients who underwent surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(22):2565–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Inouye SK, Westendorp RG, Saczynski JS. Delirium in elderly people. Lancet. 2014;383(9920):911–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vijayakumar B, Elango P, Ganessan R. Post-operative delirium in elderly patients. Indian J Anaesth. 2014;58(3):251–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Smulter N, Lingehall HC, Gustafson Y, et al. Delirium after cardiac surgery: incidence and risk factors. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013;17(5):790–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. European Delirium A, American Delirium S. The DSM-5 criteria, level of arousal and delirium diagnosis: inclusiveness is safer. BMC Med. 2014;12:141.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Martin BJ, Buth KJ, Arora RC, et al. Delirium: a cause for concern beyond the immediate postoperative period. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93(4):1114–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kazmierski J, Kowman M, Banach M, et al. Incidence and predictors of delirium after cardiac surgery: results from The IPDACS Study. J Psychosom Res. 2010;69(2):179–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Martin BJ, Buth KJ, Arora RC, et al. Delirium as a predictor of sepsis in post-coronary artery bypass grafting patients: a retrospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2010;14(5):R171.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bakker RC, Osse RJ, Tulen JH, et al. Preoperative and operative predictors of delirium after cardiac surgery in elderly patients. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg. 2012;41(3):544–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gottesman RF, Grega MA, Bailey MM, et al. Delirium after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and late mortality. Ann Neurol. 2010;67(3):338–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) Group, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle–Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(9):603–5.

    Google Scholar 

  18. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sterne JA, Egger M. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(10):1046–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chizner MA, Pearle DL, deLeon AC Jr. The natural history of aortic stenosis in adults. Am Heart J. 1980;99(4):419–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Terre JA, George I, Smith CR. Pros and cons of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;6(5):444–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Robinson TN, Eiseman B. Postoperative delirium in the elderly: diagnosis and management. Clin Interv Aging. 2008;3(2):351–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Schenning KJ, Deiner SG. Postoperative delirium in the geriatric patient. Anesthesiol Clin. 2015;33(3):505–16.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Plaschke K, Fichtenkamm P, Schramm C, et al. Early postoperative delirium after open-heart cardiac surgery is associated with decreased bispectral EEG and increased cortisol and interleukin-6. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(12):2081–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schoen J, Meyerrose J, Paarmann H, et al. Preoperative regional cerebral oxygen saturation is a predictor of postoperative delirium in on-pump cardiac surgery patients: a prospective observational trial. Crit Care. 2011;15(5):R218.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Rudolph JL, Jones RN, Levkoff SE, et al. Derivation and validation of a preoperative prediction rule for delirium after cardiac surgery. Circulation. 2009;119(2):229–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rudolph JL, Inouye SK, Jones RN, et al. Delirium: an independent predictor of functional decline after cardiac surgery. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(4):643–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Abawi M, Pagnesi M, Agostoni P, et al. Postoperative delirium in individuals undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(12):2417–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stachon P, Kaier K, Zirlik A, et al. Risk factors and outcome of postoperative delirium after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018;107(9):756–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kang H. The prevention and handling of the missing data. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013;64(5):402–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Genereux P, Cohen DJ, Williams MR, et al. Bleeding complications after surgical aortic valve replacement compared with transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from the PARTNER I trial (placement of aortic transcatheter valve). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(11):1100–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Athappan G, Patvardhan E, Tuzcu EM, et al. Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: meta-analysis and systematic review of literature. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(15):1585–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Davis DH, Muniz-Terrera G, Keage HA, et al. Association of delirium with cognitive decline in late life: a neuropathologic study of 3 population-based cohort studies. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(3):244–51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. An J, Li H, Tang Z, et al. cognitive impairment and risk of all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality over 20-year follow-up: results from the BLSA. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(15):e008252.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Perna L, Wahl HW, Mons U, et al. Cognitive impairment, all-cause and cause-specific mortality among non-demented older adults. Age Ageing. 2015;44(3):445–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chandrasekhar J, Hibbert B, Ruel M, et al. Transfemoral vs non-transfemoral access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol. 2015;31(12):1427–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sanders TB, Bowens FM, Pierce W, et al. The road to ICD-10-CM/PCS implementation: forecasting the transition for providers, payers, and other healthcare organizations. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2012;9:1f.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Kurbasic I, Pandza H, Masic I, et al. The advantages and limitations of international classification of diseases, injuries and causes of death from aspect of existing health care system of bosnia and herzegovina. Acta Inf Med AIM. 2008;16(3):159–61.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Inouye SK, Leo-Summers L, Zhang Y, et al. A chart-based method for identification of delirium: validation compared with interviewer ratings using the confusion assessment method. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(2):312–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bui LN, Pham VP, Shirkey BA, et al. Effect of delirium motoric subtypes on administrative documentation of delirium in the surgical intensive care unit. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017;31(3):631–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Thomas C, Kreisel SH, Oster P, et al. Diagnosing delirium in older hospitalized adults with dementia: adapting the confusion assessment method to international classification of diseases, tenth revision, diagnostic criteria. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(8):1471–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Villablanca PA, Mohananey D, Nikolic K, et al. Comparison of local versus general anesthesia in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;91(2):330–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Attizzani GF, Patel SM, Dangas GD, et al. Comparison of local versus general anesthesia following transfemoral transcatheter self-expanding aortic valve implantation (from the transcatheter valve therapeutics registry). Am J Cardiol. 2019;123(3):419–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bilotta F, Lauretta MP, Borozdina A, et al. Postoperative delirium: risk factors, diagnosis and perioperative care. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013;79(9):1066–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Chaput AJ, Bryson GL. Postoperative delirium: risk factors and management: continuing professional development. Can J Anaesth Journal canadien d’anesthesie. 2012;59(3):304–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Samim M, Hendrikse J, van der Worp HB, et al. Silent ischemic brain lesions after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: lesion distribution and predictors. Clin Res Cardiol. 2015;104(5):430–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bokeriia LA, Golukhova EZ, Polunina AG. Postoperative delirium in cardiac operations: microembolic load is an important factor. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(1):349–50 (author reply 350–341).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Reinsfelt B, Westerlind A, Ioanes D, et al. Transcranial Doppler microembolic signals and serum marker evidence of brain injury during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56(2):240–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Mach JR Jr, Dysken MW, Kuskowski M, et al. Serum anticholinergic activity in hospitalized older persons with delirium: a preliminary study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995;43(5):491–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Krzych LJ, Wybraniec MT, Krupka-Matuszczyk I, et al. Complex assessment of the incidence and risk factors of delirium in a large cohort of cardiac surgery patients: a single-center 6-year experience. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:835850.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Hshieh TT, Fong TG, Marcantonio ER, et al. Cholinergic deficiency hypothesis in delirium: a synthesis of current evidence. J Gerontol SerA Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008;63(7):764–72.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Van Mieghem NM, van Gils L, Ahmad H, et al. Filter-based cerebral embolic protection with transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the randomised MISTRAL-C trial. EuroIntervention. 2016;12(4):499–507.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Lansky AJ, Schofer J, Tchetche D, et al. A prospective randomized evaluation of the TriGuard HDH embolic DEFLECTion device during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: results from the DEFLECT III trial. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(31):2070–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Elie M, Cole MG, Primeau FJ, et al. Delirium risk factors in elderly hospitalized patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(3):204–12.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Inouye SK, Charpentier PA. Precipitating factors for delirium in hospitalized elderly persons. Predictive model and interrelationship with baseline vulnerability. JAMA. 1996;275(11):852–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NP: conception design, data interpretation, and draft manuscript, corresponding. RM: data acquisition and draft manuscript. JK: data acquisition and draft manuscript. CK: data acquisition and data interpretation. MAM: data interpretation and manuscript revision. WC: data interpretation and manuscript revision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Narut Prasitlumkum.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 575 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prasitlumkum, N., Mekritthikrai, R., Kewcharoen, J. et al. Delirium is associated with higher mortality in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: systemic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Interv and Ther 35, 168–176 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-019-00592-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-019-00592-y

Keywords

Navigation