Skip to main content
Log in

Bailout from Guideplus entrapment by coronary stent

  • Images in Cardiovascular Intervention
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Chan PH, Alegria-Barrero E, Foin N, Paulo M, Lindsay AC, Viceconte N, et al. Extended use of the GuideLiner in complex coronary interventions. EuroIntervention. 2015;11:325–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tsukui T, Sakakura K, Taniguchi Y, Yamamoto K, Wada H, Momomura SI, et al. Comparison of the device performance between the conventional guide extension catheter and the soft guide extension catheter. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 (Epub ahead of print).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryosuke Higuchi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (AVI 27651 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (AVI 6146 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Higuchi, R., Yokoyama, H., Hagiya, K. et al. Bailout from Guideplus entrapment by coronary stent. Cardiovasc Interv and Ther 34, 375–376 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-018-0560-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-018-0560-7

Navigation