Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of the diameter of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuff box using ultrasound in Japanese patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Catheter angioplasty or angiography via the distal access point of the radial artery (dRA), located at the anatomical snuff box, is a less invasive strategy for coronary intervention attracting considerable attention. Determining the diameter of the dRA is necessary to minimize the risk of artery occlusion and safely perform catheter intervention. This was a retrospective observational study including patients who underwent coronary angiography or coronary intervention at Aomori Kyoritsu Hospital, Aomori, Japan, between February 2018 and August 2018. The diameter of the dRA and the conventional access point of the radial artery (cRA) at the wrist of the patients were measured using ultrasound prior to angiography or interventional procedure. A total of 120 patients were analyzed. In male patients, the diameters of the cRA and dRA were 2.62 ± 0.60 mm and 2.04 ± 0.43 mm, respectively. In females, these diameters were 2.44 ± 0.51 mm and 1.96 ± 0.44 mm, respectively. Overall, the dRA was statistically significantly smaller than the cRA. However, variations were observed, with eight patients (6.7%) having a larger dRA than cRA. The diameter of the dRA indicated only that of the cRA. A multivariate analysis did not reveal factors associated with vessel diameter. The size and anatomy of the dRA varied considerably. Thus, it is difficult to predict the actual diameter of the artery. Customized selection of the size of the sheath and site of intervention is essential for each patient to safely perform ultrasound examination prior to cannulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kiemeneij F, Laarman G. Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary stent implantation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1993;30(2):173–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabró P, Frigoli E, Leonardi S, Zaro T, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9986):2465–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bavishi C, Panwar SR, Dangas GD, Barman N, Hasan CM, Baber U, et al. Meta-analysis of radial versus femoral access for percutaneous coronary interventions in non-st-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2016;117(2):172–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Saito S, Miyake S, Hosokawa G, Tanaka S, Kawamitsu K, Kaneda H, et al. Transradial coronary intervention in Japanese patients. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv. 1999;46(1):37–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kiemeneij F. Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI). EuroIntervention. 2017;13(7):851–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yoshimachi F, Kiemeneij F, Masutani M, Matsukage T, Takahashi A, Ikari Y. Safety and feasibility of the new 5 Fr Glidesheath Slender. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2016;31(1):38–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tang L, Wang F, Li Y, Zhao L, Xi H, Guo Z, Li X, et al. Ultrasound guidance for radial artery catheterization: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(11):e111527.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sobolev M, Slovut DP, Lee Chang A, Shiloh AL, Eisen LA. Ultrasound-guided catheterization of the femoral artery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Invasive Cardiol. 2015;27(7):318–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the members of the cardiac catheterization laboratory and the ultrasound examination room.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takayuki Naito.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of Aomori Kyoritsu Hospital.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naito, T., Sawaoka, T., Sasaki, K. et al. Evaluation of the diameter of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuff box using ultrasound in Japanese patients. Cardiovasc Interv and Ther 34, 312–316 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-018-00567-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-018-00567-5

Keywords

Navigation