Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Malting Barley Grain Quality and Yield Response to Nitrogen Fertilization in the Arsi Highlands of Ethiopia

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The malting industry in Ethiopia is often challenged by the availability of barley that meets the quality and quantity requirements set by the industry. Field experiments were conducted to evaluate (i) the effects of nitrogen (N) fertilization rate, variety and growing season on grain yield and grain characteristics of malting barley, and (ii) to determine the N rate that optimize grain yield and quality of malting barley. The treatments studied were five N levels (0, 23, 46, 69, and 92 kg ha−1) and two malting barley varieties (Holker and Miscal-21) over three growing seasons (2012, 2013, and 2014). The results showed that as N rates increased, malting barley grain yield, grain and straw N concentration, grain protein content, 1000-kernel weight and kernel plumpness increased, but N rates had no effect on hectoliter weight. Grain yield, grain N concentration, grain protein content, kernel plumpness and 1000-kernel weight were greater in Miscal-21, whilst straw N concentration and hectoliter weight were greater in Holker. Grain yield and hectoliter weight were affected by seasonal conditions, but grain and straw N concentration, grain protein content, kernel plumpness, and 1000-kernel weight were not affected. Although both grain yield and protein content increased with increased N rates, based on the regression equation, application of 48 kg N ha−1 gave the highest net benefit and marginal rate of return with acceptable grain quality (protein content < 11.5% and kernel plumpness > 85 g kg−1). Application of N beyond 48 kg ha-1 did not increase net benefit, but instead increased cost of production. In conclusion, to improve the likelihood that barley will be acceptable for malting, growers should limit N application and select varieties with low protein content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agegnehu G, Lakew B, Nelson PN. 2014. Cropping sequence and nitrogen fertilizer effects on the productivity and quality of malting barley and soil fertility in the Ethiopian highlands. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 60: 1261–1275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Agegnehu G, Nelson PN, Bird MI. 2016. Crop yield, plant nutrient uptake and soil physicochemical properties under organic soil amendments and nitrogen fertilization on Nitisols. Soil Till. Res. 160: 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atherton MJ. 1984. Quality requirements: malting barley, In: EJ Gallagher, Cereal Production. Butterworths in association with Royal Dublin Society, Dublin, pp 113–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Baethgen WE, Christianson CB, Lamothe AG. 1995. Nitrogen fertilizer effects on growth, grain yield and yield components of malting barley. Field Crops Res. 43: 87–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertholdsson NO. 1999. Characterization of malting barley cultivars with more or less stable grain protein content under varying environmental conditions. Eur. J. Agron. 10: 1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • BMBRI (Brewing and Malting Barley Research Institute). 2014. Quality factors in malting barley. A Brewing and Malting Barley Research Institute Publication 1510. BMBRI, Winnipeg, MB. http://www.bmbri.ca/PDF/Quality Factors in Malting Barley. (Accessed 24 Oct. 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Grains Commission. 2017. Official grain grading guide-Barley, https://www.grainscanada.gc.ca/oggg-gocg/ggg-gcg-eng.htm. (Accessed 17 August 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr PM, Horsley RD, Martin GB, Hochhalter MR. 2014. Malt barley cultivar ranking under long-term tillage systems in a semi-arid region. Agron. J. 106: 2067–2074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro A, Petrie S, Budde A, Corey A, Hayes P, Kling J, Rhinhart K. 2008. Variety and N management effects on grain yield and quality of winter barley. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 54: 1125–1131

    Google Scholar 

  • CSA (Central Statistical Authority). 2013. Report on area, production and yield of crops for private peasant holdings for main crop season 2012/13. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: CSA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen JX, Kang FD, Zhang GP. 2006. Relationship between malt qualities and beta amylase activity and protein content as affected by timing of N fertilizer application. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. 7: 79–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center). 1988. From agronomic data to farmer recommendations: An economic training manual. Revised Edition. Mexico, D.F.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edney MJ, O'Donovan JT, Turkington TK, Clayton GW, McKenzie R, et al. 2012. Effects of crop management on barley quality and endosperm modification during malting. J. Sci. Food Agric. 92: 2672–2678

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emebiri LC, Moody DB. 2004. Potential of low protein genotypes for nitrogen management in malting barley production. J. Agric. Sci. 142:319–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emebiri LC. 2015. Breeding malting barley for consistently low grain protein to sustain production against predicted changes from global warming. Mol. Breed. 35: 1–10 FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2013. Faostat 2013. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). http://faostat.fao.org

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jankovic S, Glamoclija D, Maletic R Rakic S, Uristov N, Ikanovic J. 2011. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on yield and grain quality in malting barley. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10: 19534–19541

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kangor T, Sooväli P, Tamm Y, Tamm I, Koppel M. 2017. Malting barley diseases, yield and quality responses to using various agro-technology regimes. Proc. Latvian Acad. Sci. 71: 57–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilic H, Akar T, Enver K, Ismaul S. 2010. Evaluation of grain yield and quality of barley varieties under rainfed conditions. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 9: 7825–7830

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapitan NL, Hess A, Cooper B, Botha AM, Badillo D, Iyer H, Menert M, Close T, Wright L, Harming G. 2009. Differentially expressed genes during malting and correlation with malting quality phenotypes in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 118: 937–952

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lauer JG, Partridge JR. 1990. Planting date and nitrogen rate effects on spring malting barley. Agron. J. 82: 1083–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie RH, Middleton AB, Bremer E. 2005. Fertilization, seeding date, and seeding rate for malting barley yield and quality in southern Alberta. Can. J. Plant Sci. 85: 603–614

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Magliano PN, Prystupa P, Gutierrez-Boem FH. 2014. Protein content of grains of different size fractions in malting barley. J. Inst. Brew. 120: 347–352

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MBPM (Malting Barley Production in Michigan). 2014. Michigan State University, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  • McLelland M, Panchuk K, Green B, Campbell D, Harvey B, Rossnagel B, Foster J, Kendall N. 2009. Malting barley. Government of Alberta, Agriculture and Rural Development

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donovan JT, Anbessa Y, Grant CA, Macleod AL, Edney MJ et al. 2015. Relative responses of new malting barley cultivars to increasing nitrogen rates in western Canada. Can. J. Plant Sci. 95:831–839

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O'Donovan JT, Grant CA, Blackshaw RE, Harker KN, Johnson EN et al. 2014. Rotational effects of legumes and non-legumes on hybrid canola and malting barley. Agron. J. 106: 1921–1932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Donovan JT, Turkington TK, Edney MJ, Clayton GW, McKenzie RH et al. 2011. Seeding rate, nitrogen rate and cultivar effects on malting barley production. Agron. J. 103: 709–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sainju UM, Lenssen AW, Barsotti LJ. 2013. Dryland malt barley yield and quality affected by tillage, cropping sequence and nitrogen fertilization. Agron. J. 105: 329–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sainju UM, Stevens WB, Caesar-Ton T, Iversen WM. 2015. Malt barley yield and quality affected by irrigation, tillage, crop rotation, and nitrogen fertilization. Agron. J. 107: 2107–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. 2007. SAS/STAT User's Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinebo W, Gretzmacher R, Edelbauer A. 2004. Genotypic variation for nitrogen use efficiency in Ethiopian barley. Field Crops Res. 85: 43–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith EG, O'Donovan JT, Henderson WJ, Turkington TK, McKenzie RH et al. 2012. Return and risk of malting barley production in western Canada. Agron. J. 104: 1374–1382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith EG, Turkington TK, O'Donovan JT, Edne MJ, Juskiw PE et al. 2016. Influence of production systems on return and risk from malting barley production in western Canada. Can. J. Plant Sci. 96: 339–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Therrien MC, Carmichael CA, Noll JS, Grant CA. 1994. Effect of fertilizer management, genotype, and environmental factors on some malting quality characteristics in barley. Can J. Plant Sci. 74: 545–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson TL, Ottman MJ, Saxton ER 2004. Basal stem nitrate tests for irrigated malting barley. Agron. J. 96: 516–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkington TK, O'Donovan JT, Edney MJ, Juskiw PE, McKenzie RH et al. 2012. Effect of crop residue, nitrogen rate and fungicide application on malting barley productivity, quality and foliar disease severity. Can. J. Plant Sci. 92: 577–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vahamidis P, Stefopoulou A, Kotoulas V, Lyra D, Dercas D, Economou G. 2017. Yield, grain size, protein content and water use efficiency of null-LOX malt barley in a semiarid Mediterranean agroecosystem. Field Crops Res. 206: 115–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade A, Froment MA. 2003. Barley quality and grain size homogeneity for malting. Vol. I. Agronomic effects on varieties. Project Report #320. Home Grown Cereals Authority, Stoneleigh Park, Kenilworth, Warwickshire, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter EB, Bruce CC, Lamonthe AG. 1995. Nitrogen fertilizer effects on growth, grain yield and yield components of malt barley. Field Crop Res. 43: 87–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weston DT, Horsley RD, Schwarz PB, Goos RJ. 1993. Nitrogen and planting effects on low-protein spring barley. Agron. J. 85: 1170–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu XJ, Chen X, Zeng FR, Zhang GP. 2015. The genotypic difference in the effect of water stress after anthesis on the malt quality parameters in barley. J. Cereal Sci. 65: 209–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely and gratefully acknowledge: Arsi University for providing financial support; Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center for providing land, seed, fertilizer, and its staff for their friendly help; Asella Malt Factory for providing laboratory service for protein analysis, and its staff for their friendly help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Arsi University, P O Box 193, Asella, Ethiopia

    Meharie Kassie

  2. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Addis Aababa, Ethiopia

    Kindie Tesfaye

Authors
  1. Meharie Kassie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kindie Tesfaye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meharie Kassie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kassie, M., Tesfaye, K. Malting Barley Grain Quality and Yield Response to Nitrogen Fertilization in the Arsi Highlands of Ethiopia. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 22, 225–234 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-019-0080-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-019-0080-0

Key words

Search

Navigation