Catalyst Degradation Under Potential Cycling as an Accelerated Stress Test for PBI-Based High-Temperature PEM Fuel Cells—Effect of Humidification
- 145 Downloads
In the present work, high-temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells were subjected to accelerated stress tests of 30,000 potential cycles between 0.6 and 1.0 V at 160 °C (133 h cycling time). The effect that humidity has on the catalyst durability was studied by testing either with or without humidification of the nitrogen that was used as cathode gas during cycling segments. Pronounced degradation was seen from the polarization curves in both cases, though permanent only in the humidified case. In the unhumidified case, the performance loss was more or less recoverable following 24 h of operation at 200 mA cm−2. A difference in degradation behavior was verified with electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The strong effect of humidification is explained by drying of the phosphoric acid that is in the catalyst layer(s) versus maintaining humidification of this region. Catalyst degradation due to platinum dissolution, transport of its ions, and eventual recrystallization is reduced when this portion of the acid dries out. Consequently, catalyst particles are only mildly affected by the potential cycling in the unhumidified case.
KeywordsDurability Accelerated stress test Potential cycling Polymer electrolyte membrane Fuel cell Polybenzimidazole Platinum dissolution
This work has been financially supported by the Danish ForskEL program (DuRaPEM III, no. 2013-1-12064; UPCAT, no. 2015-1-12315; SMARTMEA, no. 2014-1-12218) and by Innovation Fund Denmark (4M Centre, no. 12-132710).
- 7.K. Kinoshita, Carbon: Electrochemical and Physiochemical Properties (Wiley, New York, 1988), pp. 316–334Google Scholar
- 10.V. Atrazhev, S.F. Burlatsky, N.E. Cipollini, D.A. Condit, N. Erikhman, ECS Trans. 1, 239–246 (2006)Google Scholar
- 17.M. Rau, A. Niedergesäß, C. Cremers, S. Alfaro, T. Steenberg, H.A. Hjuler, Fuel Cells 16, 577–583 (2016)Google Scholar
- 21.F.T. Wagner, S.G. Yan, P.T. Yu, in Handbook of Fuel Cells: Fundamentals, Technology and Applications—Volume 5: Advances in Electrocatalysis, Materials, Diagnostics and Durability, ed. by W. Vielstich, H. Yokokawa, H.A. Gasteiger (Wiley, Weinheim, 2009), p. 250–264Google Scholar
- 25.S. Yu, L. Xiao, B.C. Benicewicz, Fuel Cells 8, 165–174 (2008)Google Scholar
- 28.L.N. Cleemann, F. Buazar, Q. Li, J.O. Jensen, C. Pan, T. Steenberg, S. Dai, N.J. Bjerrum, Fuel Cells 13, 822–831 (2013)Google Scholar
- 35.D. Schonvogel, M. Rastedt, P. Wagner, M. Wark, A. Dyck, Fuel Cells 16, 480–489 (2016)Google Scholar
- 37.A. Vassiliev, High Temperature PEM Fuel Cells and Organic Fuels. (PhD thesis, Department of Energy Conversion and Storage, Technical University of Denmark, 2014)Google Scholar
- 47.R. Borup, J. Meyers, B. Pivovar, Y.S. Kim, R. Mukundan, N. Garland, D. Myers, M. Wilson, F. Garzon, D. Wood, P. Zelenay, K. More, K. Stroh, T. Zawodzinski, J. Boncella, J.E. McGrath, M. Inaba, K. Miyatake, M. Hori, K. Ota, Z. Ogumi, S. Miyata, A. Nishikata, Z. Siroma, Y. Uchimoto, K. Yasuda, K.-I. Kimijima, N. Iwashita, Chem. Rev. 107, 3904–3951 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 52.K.E. Gubbins, R.D. Walker Jr., J. Electrochem. Soc. 112, 469–471 (1965)Google Scholar
- 54.F. Gan, D.-T. Chin, J. Appl. Electrochem. 23, 452–455 (1993)Google Scholar