Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Body Mindfulness Questionnaire
- 419 Downloads
The body is central in many mindfulness-based interventions. Body mindfulness has been defined as observing body experiences and as a consequence appreciating body experiences. Since only a few psychometrically sound questionnaires are available to measure the observing aspect of body mindfulness and no scale specifically addresses the appreciating aspect of body mindfulness, the Body Mindfulness Questionnaire (BMQ) was created. This study presents the development and the psychometric evaluation of the BMQ. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses suggested two scales: “Experiencing Body Awareness” and “Appreciating Body Awareness”. Evidence for the reliability (internal consistency and retest reliability), validity (factorial validity and construct validity), and sensitivity to change is reported. The findings suggest that the BMQ is a valid and reliable instrument that allows assessment of essential facets of body mindfulness.
KeywordsMindfulness Body Assessment Embodiment
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
All authors declare no conflicts of interests.
All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Research Ethics Committee of the German Psychological Association approved the trial on MBCT and CBASP for chronically depressed patients (JM072009).
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
The trial on MBCT and CBASP for chronic depression was funded by the German Science Foundation (Mi 700/4-1).
- Analayo, B. (2003). Satipaṭṭhāna. The direct path to realization. Birmingham: Windhorse Publications.Google Scholar
- Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-Fuenf-Faktoren Inventar (NEO-FFI) nach Costa und McCrae. Goettingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
- Brown, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five factor inventory: professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- Ehlers, A., & Margraf, J. (1993). Fragebogen zu körperbezogenen Ängsten, Kognitionen und Vermeidung. Beltz Test: Weinheim.Google Scholar
- First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. (1996). Structured clinical interview for the DSM-IV axis I disorders.Google Scholar
- Forkmann, T., Brakemeier, E. L., Teismann, T., Schramm, E., & Michalak, J. (2016). The effects of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy added to treatment as usual on suicidal ideation in chronic depression: results of a randomized-clinical trial. Journal of Affective Disorders, 200, 51–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hautzinger, M., & Bailer, M. (1993). ADS. Allgemeine Depressions Skala. Göttingen: Beltz Test.Google Scholar
- Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: the program of the stress reduction Clinic at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center. New York: Delta.Google Scholar
- Kabat-Zinn, J. (2005). Coming to our senses. Healing ourselves and the world through mindfulness. New York: Hyperion.Google Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press: New York.Google Scholar
- Kuehner, C., Huffziger, S., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2007). Response Styles Questionnaire—German version (RSQ-D). Goettingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
- Leutbecher, M. (1998). Subjektive Belastung pflegender Angehoeriger. Entwicklung einer Selbstbeurteilungsskala und empirische Prüfung. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universität Erlangen-Nuernberg.Google Scholar
- McCullough, J. P. (2000). Treatment for chronic depression: Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Michalak, J., Schultze, M., Heidenreich, T., & Schramm, E. (2015). A randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and a group version of cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy for chronically depressed patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83, 951–963.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Michalak, J., Probst, T., Heidenreich, T., Bissantz, N., & Schramm, E. (2016). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and a group version of cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy for chronic depression: follow-up data of a randomized controlled trial and the moderating role of childhood adversities. Psychotherapy & Psychosomatics, 85, 378–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide (Fifth ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Olkin, J. (1967). Correlations revisited. In J. C. Stanley (Ed.), Improving experimental design and statistical analysis. Chicago: Rand McNalley.Google Scholar
- Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2002). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression—a new approach to preventing relapse. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Spitzer, C., Stieglitz, R.-D., & Freyberger, H. J. (2005). Fragebogen zu Dissoziativen Symptomen: Ein Selbstbeurteilungsverfahren zur syndromalen Diagnostik dissoziativer Phänomene. Goettingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
- Tanay, G., & Bernstein, A. (2013). State Mindfulness Scale (SMS): Development and initial validation. Psychological Assessment, 25, 1286-1299.Google Scholar
- Thich Nhat Hanh. (1974). The miracle of mindfulness. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar