Mindfulness

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 603–614 | Cite as

A Pilot RCT of a Values-Based Mindfulness Group Intervention with Jail Inmates: Evidence for Reduction in Post-Release Risk Behavior

  • Elizabeth T. Malouf
  • Kerstin Youman
  • Jeffrey Stuewig
  • Edward A. Witt
  • June P. Tangney
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

This study pilot-tested a values and mindfulness-based intervention (Re-Entry Values and Mindfulness Program: REVAMP) in a sample of male jail inmates. REVAMP aimed to reduce post-release risky behavior by targeting dimensions of mindfulness (e.g., willingness/acceptance) and associated proximal outcomes/ mechanisms of action (emotion regulation, self-control, shame/guilt). Inmates were randomly assigned to REVAMP (n = 21) or treatment as usual (TAU, n = 19). Attendance and feedback supported REVAMP’s feasibility and acceptability. At post-treatment, ANCOVAs showed that the REVAMP group increased more on willingness/acceptance, self-judgment, and shame relative to TAU. Relative increases in willingness/acceptance persisted at 3-month post-release. Criminal activity was assessed by self-report at 3 months post-release and official criminal records at 3 years post-release. At both time points, there was a marginally statistically significant trend of medium effect size for lower criminal recidivism in the REVAMP group compared to TAU. There were no statistically significant differences in self-reported post-release substance misuse. This pilot RCT indicated mindfulness-based interventions may hold promise for reducing inmates’ post-release risky behavior and encourages future research in this area.

Keywords

Mindfulness Criminal behavior Substance abuse Jail inmates Values 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All participants underwent a process of informed consent, which stressed the voluntary nature of participation and the confidentiality of data. Data are protected by a Certificate of Confidentiality from Department of Health and Human Services. All research procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board at the researchers’ university. This research was supported by a grant from the Center for Consciousness and Transformation (CCT) at George Mason University and by two grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA): #R01 DA14694 to June P. Tangney and #F31DA029397 to Elizabeth Malouf. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R. F., Gailliot, M., DeWall, C. N., & Oaten, M. (2006). Self-regulation and personality: how interventions increase regulatory success, and how depletion moderates the effects of traits on behavior. Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1773–1801.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowen, S., Witkiewitz, K., Dillworth, T. M., Chawla, N., Simpson, T. L., Ostafin, B. D., Larimer, M. E., Blume, A. W., Parks, G. A., & Marlatt, G. A. (2006). Mindfulness meditation and substance use in an incarcerated population. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors: Journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 20, 343–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowen, S., Chawla, N., & Marlatt, G. A. (2010). Mindfulness-based relapse prevention for addictive behaviors: a clinician’s guide. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  6. Bowlin, S. L., & Baer, R. A. (2012). Relationships between mindfulness, self-control, and psychological functioning. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 411–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chambers, R., Gullone, E., & Allen, N. B. (2009). Mindful emotion regulation: an integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 560–572.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  9. Dafoe, T., & Stermac, L. (2013). Mindfulness meditation as an adjunct approach to treatment within the correctional system. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 52, 198–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gausel, N., & Leach, C. W. (2011). Concern for self-image and social image in the management of moral failure: rethinking shame. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 468–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harty, L., Youman, K., Malouf, E., Appel, M., Hall, S., Pilafova, A., & Tangney, J. P. (2009). Mindfulness inventory: nine dimensions (MI:ND). Fairfax: George Mason University.Google Scholar
  12. Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. W., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., & Strosahl, K. (1996). Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: a functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(6), 1152–1168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: model processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hodgins, H. S., & Adair, K. C. (2010). Attentional processes and meditation. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 872–878.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Leach, C. W., & Cidam, A. (2015). When is shame linked to constructive approach orientation? A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 983–1002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee, K., Bowen, S., & An-Fu, B. A. I. (2011). Psychosocial outcomes of mindfulness-based relapse prevention in incarcerated substance abusers in Taiwan: a preliminary study. Journal of Substance Use, 16, 476–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leonard, N. R., Jha, A. P., Casarjian, B., Goolsarran, M., Garcia, C., Cleland, C. M., Gwadz, M. V., & Massey, Z. (2013). Mindfulness training improves attention task performance in incarcerated youth: a group randomized controlled intervention trial. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 792–802.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Lewis, H. B. (1971). Shame and guilt in neurosis. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  19. Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  20. Malouf, E. T., Youman, K., Harty, L., Schaefer, K., & Tangney, J. P. (2013). Accepting guilt and abandoning shame: a positive approach addressing moral emotions among high-risk, multi-need individuals. In T. B. Kashdan & J. Ciarrochi (Eds.), Mindfulness, acceptance, and positive psychology: the seven foundations of well-being (pp. 215–239). Oakland: New Harbinger.Google Scholar
  21. Malouf, E. T., Schaefer, K. E., Witt, E. A., Moore, K. E., Stuewig, J., & Tangney, J. P. (2014). The brief self-control scale predicts jail inmates’ recidivism, substance dependence, and post-release adjustment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 334–347.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Malouf, E.T., Witt, E.A., Monfort, S., Yarbro, J., Youman, K., Harty, L., Nightingale, V., Stuewig, J., & Tangney, J.P., (2016). Reliability, validity, and predictive utility of the Mindfulness Inventory: Nine Dimensions (MIND). Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  23. Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: how ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Masicampo, E. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2007). Relating mindfulness and self-regulatory processes. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 255–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Minton, T. D. (2011). Jail inmates at midyear 2010—statistical tables (NCJ 233431). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from http://bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=2375.
  26. Morey, L. C. (1991). The personality assessment inventory professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  27. Shonin, E., Van Gordon, W., Slade, K., & Griffiths, M. D. (2013). Mindfulness and other Buddhist-derived interventions in correctional settings: a systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Simpson, D. D., & Knight, K. (1998). Texas Christian University data collection forms for correctional residential treatment. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University, Institute of Behavioral Research.Google Scholar
  29. Sumter, M. T., Monk-Turner, E., & Turner, C. (2009). The benefits of meditation practice in the correctional setting. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 15, 47–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York: Guilford Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–324.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., Krishnan, S., Youman, K., Appel, M., Roop, L., & Durbin, K. M. (2008). The test of self-conscious affect—version 4 (TOSCA-4). Fairfax: George Mason University.Google Scholar
  33. Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., Mashek, D., & Hastings, M. (2011). Assessing jail inmates’ proneness to shame and guilt: feeling bad about the behavior or the self? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 710–734.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Martinez, A. G. (2014). Two faces of shame: understanding shame and guilt in the prediction of jail inmates’ recidivism. Psychological Science, 25, 799–805.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. West, H. C., Sabol, W. J., & Greenman, S. J. (2010). Prisoners in 2009 (NCJ 231675). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/p09.pdf.
  36. Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2001). The five factor model and impulsivity: using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 669–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2003). Understanding the role of impulsivity and externalizing psychopathology in alcohol abuse: application of the UPPS impulsive behavior scale. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11, 210–217.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Youman, K., Malouf, E., Tangney, J. P., & Harty, L. (2010). REVAMP: The re-entry values and mindfulness program manual. George Mason University.Google Scholar
  39. Zamble, E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1997). The criminal recidivism process. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zarling, A., Lawrence, E., & Marchman, J. (2015). A randomized controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy for aggressive behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(1), 199–212.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth T. Malouf
    • 1
  • Kerstin Youman
    • 2
  • Jeffrey Stuewig
    • 1
  • Edward A. Witt
    • 3
  • June P. Tangney
    • 1
  1. 1.George Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.Regional Institute for Children and AdolescentsRockvilleUSA
  3. 3.Kantar HealthPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations