Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Pilot RCT of a Values-Based Mindfulness Group Intervention with Jail Inmates: Evidence for Reduction in Post-Release Risk Behavior

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Mindfulness Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study pilot-tested a values and mindfulness-based intervention (Re-Entry Values and Mindfulness Program: REVAMP) in a sample of male jail inmates. REVAMP aimed to reduce post-release risky behavior by targeting dimensions of mindfulness (e.g., willingness/acceptance) and associated proximal outcomes/ mechanisms of action (emotion regulation, self-control, shame/guilt). Inmates were randomly assigned to REVAMP (n = 21) or treatment as usual (TAU, n = 19). Attendance and feedback supported REVAMP’s feasibility and acceptability. At post-treatment, ANCOVAs showed that the REVAMP group increased more on willingness/acceptance, self-judgment, and shame relative to TAU. Relative increases in willingness/acceptance persisted at 3-month post-release. Criminal activity was assessed by self-report at 3 months post-release and official criminal records at 3 years post-release. At both time points, there was a marginally statistically significant trend of medium effect size for lower criminal recidivism in the REVAMP group compared to TAU. There were no statistically significant differences in self-reported post-release substance misuse. This pilot RCT indicated mindfulness-based interventions may hold promise for reducing inmates’ post-release risky behavior and encourages future research in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: Author.

  • Baumeister, R. F., Gailliot, M., DeWall, C. N., & Oaten, M. (2006). Self-regulation and personality: how interventions increase regulatory success, and how depletion moderates the effects of traits on behavior. Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1773–1801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, S., Witkiewitz, K., Dillworth, T. M., Chawla, N., Simpson, T. L., Ostafin, B. D., Larimer, M. E., Blume, A. W., Parks, G. A., & Marlatt, G. A. (2006). Mindfulness meditation and substance use in an incarcerated population. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors: Journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 20, 343–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, S., Chawla, N., & Marlatt, G. A. (2010). Mindfulness-based relapse prevention for addictive behaviors: a clinician’s guide. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlin, S. L., & Baer, R. A. (2012). Relationships between mindfulness, self-control, and psychological functioning. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 411–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., Gullone, E., & Allen, N. B. (2009). Mindful emotion regulation: an integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 560–572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dafoe, T., & Stermac, L. (2013). Mindfulness meditation as an adjunct approach to treatment within the correctional system. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 52, 198–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gausel, N., & Leach, C. W. (2011). Concern for self-image and social image in the management of moral failure: rethinking shame. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 468–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harty, L., Youman, K., Malouf, E., Appel, M., Hall, S., Pilafova, A., & Tangney, J. P. (2009). Mindfulness inventory: nine dimensions (MI:ND). Fairfax: George Mason University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. W., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., & Strosahl, K. (1996). Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: a functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(6), 1152–1168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: model processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgins, H. S., & Adair, K. C. (2010). Attentional processes and meditation. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 872–878.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, C. W., & Cidam, A. (2015). When is shame linked to constructive approach orientation? A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 983–1002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Bowen, S., & An-Fu, B. A. I. (2011). Psychosocial outcomes of mindfulness-based relapse prevention in incarcerated substance abusers in Taiwan: a preliminary study. Journal of Substance Use, 16, 476–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, N. R., Jha, A. P., Casarjian, B., Goolsarran, M., Garcia, C., Cleland, C. M., Gwadz, M. V., & Massey, Z. (2013). Mindfulness training improves attention task performance in incarcerated youth: a group randomized controlled intervention trial. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 792–802.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, H. B. (1971). Shame and guilt in neurosis. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malouf, E. T., Youman, K., Harty, L., Schaefer, K., & Tangney, J. P. (2013). Accepting guilt and abandoning shame: a positive approach addressing moral emotions among high-risk, multi-need individuals. In T. B. Kashdan & J. Ciarrochi (Eds.), Mindfulness, acceptance, and positive psychology: the seven foundations of well-being (pp. 215–239). Oakland: New Harbinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malouf, E. T., Schaefer, K. E., Witt, E. A., Moore, K. E., Stuewig, J., & Tangney, J. P. (2014). The brief self-control scale predicts jail inmates’ recidivism, substance dependence, and post-release adjustment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 334–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malouf, E.T., Witt, E.A., Monfort, S., Yarbro, J., Youman, K., Harty, L., Nightingale, V., Stuewig, J., & Tangney, J.P., (2016). Reliability, validity, and predictive utility of the Mindfulness Inventory: Nine Dimensions (MIND). Manuscript in preparation.

  • Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: how ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Masicampo, E. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2007). Relating mindfulness and self-regulatory processes. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 255–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minton, T. D. (2011). Jail inmates at midyear 2010—statistical tables (NCJ 233431). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from http://bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=2375.

  • Morey, L. C. (1991). The personality assessment inventory professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shonin, E., Van Gordon, W., Slade, K., & Griffiths, M. D. (2013). Mindfulness and other Buddhist-derived interventions in correctional settings: a systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 365–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, D. D., & Knight, K. (1998). Texas Christian University data collection forms for correctional residential treatment. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University, Institute of Behavioral Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumter, M. T., Monk-Turner, E., & Turner, C. (2009). The benefits of meditation practice in the correctional setting. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 15, 47–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York: Guilford Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., Krishnan, S., Youman, K., Appel, M., Roop, L., & Durbin, K. M. (2008). The test of self-conscious affect—version 4 (TOSCA-4). Fairfax: George Mason University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., Mashek, D., & Hastings, M. (2011). Assessing jail inmates’ proneness to shame and guilt: feeling bad about the behavior or the self? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 710–734.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Martinez, A. G. (2014). Two faces of shame: understanding shame and guilt in the prediction of jail inmates’ recidivism. Psychological Science, 25, 799–805.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • West, H. C., Sabol, W. J., & Greenman, S. J. (2010). Prisoners in 2009 (NCJ 231675). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/p09.pdf.

  • Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2001). The five factor model and impulsivity: using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 669–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2003). Understanding the role of impulsivity and externalizing psychopathology in alcohol abuse: application of the UPPS impulsive behavior scale. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11, 210–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Youman, K., Malouf, E., Tangney, J. P., & Harty, L. (2010). REVAMP: The re-entry values and mindfulness program manual. George Mason University.

  • Zamble, E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1997). The criminal recidivism process. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zarling, A., Lawrence, E., & Marchman, J. (2015). A randomized controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy for aggressive behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(1), 199–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth T. Malouf.

Ethics declarations

All participants underwent a process of informed consent, which stressed the voluntary nature of participation and the confidentiality of data. Data are protected by a Certificate of Confidentiality from Department of Health and Human Services. All research procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board at the researchers’ university. This research was supported by a grant from the Center for Consciousness and Transformation (CCT) at George Mason University and by two grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA): #R01 DA14694 to June P. Tangney and #F31DA029397 to Elizabeth Malouf. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malouf, E.T., Youman, K., Stuewig, J. et al. A Pilot RCT of a Values-Based Mindfulness Group Intervention with Jail Inmates: Evidence for Reduction in Post-Release Risk Behavior. Mindfulness 8, 603–614 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0636-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0636-3

Keywords

Navigation