Weather or not? Welfare impacts of natural gas pipeline expansion in the northeastern U.S.
- 1 Downloads
With the rapid development of new natural gas resources in the United States has come a number of proposals for new natural gas transmission infrastructure. We use a unique and fine-grained data set on natural gas spot pricing and gas transmission operations to model how a local pipeline expansion connecting a Marcellus Shale producing area to the main Transco pipeline system would affect flow patterns and zonal gas pricing across the Transco. Our modeling approach is based on arbitrage cost models for constrained energy networks, accounting for the effects of zonal gas transmission rates as mandated by the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Application of our model to a data set of daily gas market outcomes and operating conditions on the Transco between 2012 and mid 2014 suggests that the modeled pipeline expansion would increase overall economic welfare in the spot market for Transco deliveries by $1.7 billion and have positive net social benefits of about $0.4 billion. However, more than 80% of this estimated welfare gain occurs in one season (winter 2014) featuring high gas demand due to colder weather. Thus, the spot market efficiency gains associated with pipeline projects in the Marcellus region may be limited by the frequency of extreme cold weather conditions. To examine the sensitivity of our estimates of welfare gains to different weather conditions, we calculate the expected benefits of the pipeline expansion in terms of historical temperatures from 1992 to 2011, and find that Atlantic Sunrise would have increased welfare by approximately $1.8 billion over a two and half year period, on average.
KeywordsNatural gas pipelines Pipeline expansion Welfare Arbitrage cost model Total surplus
JEL ClassificationL95 P18 Q02 Q31 R40
- 1.Bent, R., Blumsack, S., van Hentenryck, P., Borraz Sanchez, C., Backhaus, S.: Joint expansion planning for electric and gas transmission with endogenous market feedbacks. In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 2595-2605 (2018)Google Scholar
- 10.Energy Information Administration (EIA): Reduced form energy model elasticities from EIA’s regional short-term energy model (2006). http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/steo/special/pdf/elasticities.pdf. Accessed 9 June 2018
- 11.Energy Information Administration (EIA): Fuel competition in power generation and elasticities of substitution (2012). https://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/fuelelasticities/pdf/eia-fuelelasticities.pdf. Accessed 9 June 2018
- 12.Energy Information Administration (EIA): Natural gas gross withdrawals and production by U.S. State, (2017). http://www.eia.gov/naturalgas/data.cfm. Accessed 9 June 2018
- 16.Hausman, C., Kellogg, R.: Welfare and distributional implications of shale gas, NBER Working Paper 21115 (2015)Google Scholar
- 18.Joutz, F., Trost, R., Shin, D., McDowell, B.: Estimating regional short-run and long-run price elasticities of residential natural gas demand in the U.S., Social Science Research Paper August 6, (2009). http://ssrn.com/abstract=1444927
- 21.Kleit, A.N., Lo Prete, C., Blumsack, S., Guo, N.: Weather or not? Welfare impacts of natural gas pipeline expansion in the Northeastern U.S. Social Science Research Paper, July 31 (2015). http://ssrn.com/abstract=2638445
- 25.PJM Interconnection, LLC: Analysis of operational events and market impacts during the January 2014 cold weather events, May 8, 2014, http://www.pjm.com/~/media/documents/reports/20140509-analysis-of-operational-events-and-market-impacts-during-the-jan-2014-cold-weather-events.ashx
- 26.Rosendahl, K.E., Sagen, E.L.: The global natural gas market: will transport cost reductions lead to lower prices? Energy J. 30(2), 17–39 (2009)Google Scholar
- 29.Williams, Transco 1Line Portal. http://www.1line.williams.com/Transco/index.html. Accessed 9 June 2018
- 30.Zwart, G.T.J.: European natural gas markets: resource constraints and market power. Energy J. 30, 151–165 (2009) (Special Issue: “World Natural Gas Markets and Trade: a Multi-Modeling Perspective”)Google Scholar