Advertisement

Energy Systems

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 343–359 | Cite as

Combined operation, modeling and life cycle assessment of a generic hybrid power system installed in Crete

  • Nektarios Arnaoutakis
  • Fotis Kanellos
  • Spiros Papaefthimiou
Original Paper
  • 98 Downloads

Abstract

In this work the energy modeling and the life cycle analysis of a generic hybrid power system (HPS) installed in the island of Crete, Greece is presented. The studied system comprises a cogeneration system (CG), photovoltaics (PV) and wind turbines (WT). Two cases (i.e. autonomous or grid-connected operation) have been examined, while the life time operation period of the system was assumed to 25 years. The main aim of this study is to determine the optimal sizing of this generic HPS aiming at the highest performance and the lowest environmental impacts and operating costs. A second objective is to analyze the life cycle of the HPS in order to highlight the anticipated environmental impacts throughout its lifetime and to draw general conclusions for the viability of such systems especially in islands. The energy performance of the studied HPS was modeled using HOMER while the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was implemented in SimaPro.

Keywords

Generic hybrid power system Cogeneration system Photovoltaics Wind turbines Life cycle assessment (LCA) 

References

  1. 1.
    Lins, C., Musolino, E., Petrichenko, K., Rickerson, W., Sawin, J.L., Seyboth, K., Skeen, J., Sovacool, B., Sverrisson, F., Williamson, L.E.: Renewables 2015: global status report. Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century, Paris (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kelemeris, Y.: Rising to the challenge:the growth of wind powergeneration in Greece. 1 October 2008 (Online). http://www.kelemenis.com/pdf/pub11.pdf. Accessed 7 Dec 2015
  3. 3.
    Hittinger, E., Whitacre, J., Apt, J.: Compensating for wind variability using co-located natural gas generation and energy storage. Energy Syst. 1, 417–439 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nor, E.M.R., Sharifah, R.W.A., Zainnuddin, A.M., Jiri, J.K., Mohammad, Y.H.: Process integration of hybrid power systems with energy losses considerations. Energy 55, 38–45 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Katsigiannis, Y.A., Kanellos, F.D., Papaefthimiou, S.: A software tool for capacity optimization of hybrid power systems including renewable energy technologies based on a hybrid genetic algorithm–tabu search optimization methodology. Energy Syst. 7, 33–48 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mondal, M.A.H., Denich, M.: Assessment of renewable energy resources potential for electricity generation in Bangladesh. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14, 2401–2413 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Amin, M.M., Moussa, H.B., Mohammed, O.A.: Wide area measurement system for smart grid applications involving hybrid energy sources. Energy Syst. 3, 3–21 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu, P., Zhou, W., Sun, H., Bai, J., Liu, J., Liu, Y.: A new pattern wind power suppression system based on hybrid energy storage techniques. Energy Syst. 4, 1–24 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ghazi, Z., Doustmohammadi, A.: Fault detection and power distribution optimization of smart grids based on hybrid Petri net. Energy Syst. 1–29 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Okido, S., Takeda, A.: Economic and environmental analysis of photovoltaic energy systems via robust optimization. Energy Syst. 4, 239–266 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cihan, G., Dursun, B.: A comprehensive economical and environmental analysis of the renewable power generating systems for Kırklareli University, Turkey. Energy Build. 64, 249–257 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Demiroren, A., Yilmaz, U.: Analysis of change in electric energy cost with using renewable energy sources in G\(\ddot{{\rm o}}\)kceada, Turkey: An island example. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14, 323–333 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Giannoulis, E., Haralambopoulos, D.: Distributed Generation in an isolated grid: Methodology of case study for Lesvos - Greece. Appl. Energy 88, 2530–2540 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hafez, O., Bhattacharya, K.: Optimal planning and design of a renewable energy based supply system for microgrids. Renew. Energy 45, 7–15 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Setiawan, A.A., Zhao, Y., Nayar, C.V.: Design, economic analysis and environmental considerations of mini-grid hybrid power system with reverse osmosis desalination plant for remote areas. Renew. Energy 34, 374–383 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aly, A.M.: Dynamic modeling and power management for stand-alone AC-coupled photovoltaic system. Energy Syst. 7, 529–547 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chong, L., Xinfeng, G., Yuan, Z., Chang, X., Yan, R., Chenguang, S., Chunxia, Y.: Techno-economic feasibility study of autonomous hybrid wind/PV/battery power system for household in Urumpi, China. Energy 55, 263–272 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dhaker, A., Andre, M., Gerard, C.: Life cycle cost, empodied energy and loss of power supply probability for the optimal design of hybrid power systems. Math. Comput. Simul. 98, 46–62 (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mahlia, T.M., Chan, P.L.: Life cycle cost analysis of fuel cell based cogeneration system for residential application in Malaysia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15, 416–426 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Khan, M.J., Iqbal, M.T.: Pre-feasibility study of stand-alone hybrid energy systems for applications in Newfoundland. Renew. Energy 30, 835–854 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Iqbal, M.T.: Pre-feasibility study of a wind-diesel system for St. Brendan’s, Newfoundland. Wind Eng. 27, 39–51 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Prodromidis, G.N., Coutelieris, F.A.: A comparative feasibility study of stand-alone and grid connected RES-based systems in several Greek Islands. Renew. Energy 36, 1957–1963 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dalton, G., Lockington, D., Baldock, T.: Case study feasibility analysis of renewable energy supply options for small to medium-sized tourist accommodations. Renew. Energy 34, 1134–1144 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Türkay, B.E., Telli, A.Y.: Economic analysis of standalone and grid connected hybrid energy systems. Renew. Energy 36, 1931–1943 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Karakoulidis, K., Mavridis, K., Bandekas, D., Adoniadis, P., Potolias, C., Vordos, N.: Techno-economic analysis of a stand-alone hybrid photovoltaic-dieselebattery-fuel cell power system. Renew. Energy 36, 2238–2244 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zoulias, E., Lymberopoulos, N.: Techno-economic analysis of the integration of hydrogen energy technologies in renewable energy-based stand-alone power systems. Renew. Energy 32, 680–696 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Himri, Y., Stambouli, A.B., Draoui, B., Himri, S.: Techno-economical study of hybrid power system for a remote village in Algeria. Energy 33, 1128–1136 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fantidis, J.G., Bandekas, D.V., Potolias, C., Vordos, N.: The effect of the financial crisis on electricity cost for remote consumers: case study Samothrace (Greece). Int. J. Renew. Energy Res. 1, 281–289 (2011)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Evert, N.: Methodology for the Life-Cycle Assessment of Energy Technologies: First Interim Report, vol. 1. Department of Science, Technology and Society of the Utrecht University, Utrecht (1994)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tuomas, S.: A Textbook on Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 3. Finnish Association of Graduate Engineers TEK, Helsinki (1997)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    ISO, ISO 14040: The International Organisation for Standardisation (2006)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    ISO, ISO 14044: The International Organisation for Standardisation (2006)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    PreConsultans.: SimaPro Software and Sustainability Consulting. 1 October 2015 (Online). https://www.pre-sustainability.com/. Accessed 7 Dec 2015
  34. 34.
    Ecoinvent.: ecoinvent version 3. 30 November 2016 (Online). http://www.ecoinvent.org/. Accessed 7 Dec 2016
  35. 35.
    PreConsultans.: Eco-indicator 99, Manual for Designers (Online). (2000). https://www.pre-sustainability.com/download/EI99_Manual.pdf. Accessed 2016
  36. 36.
    Chow, T.T., Ji, J.: Environmental life-cycle analysis of hybrid solar photovoltaic/thermal systems for use in Hong Kong. Int. J. Photoenergy 9 (2012)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fthenakis, V.M., Kim, H.C.: Photovoltaics: life-cycle analyses. Solar Energy 85, 1609–1628 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fthenakis, V.M., Kim, H.C.: Life cycle assessment of high-concentration photovoltaic systems. Wiley, p 10 (2011)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gallardo, J.P.P., Astier, S., Azzaro-pantel, C., Pibouleau, L., Domenech, S.: Multiobjective optimization of large scale photovoltaic (PV) systems design: technico-economic and life-cycle assessment considerations. Chem. Eng. Trans. 25, 483–488 (2011)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Marimuthu, C., Kirubakaran, V.: Carbon pay back period for solar and wind energy project installed in India: a critical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 23, 80–90 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhong, Z.W., Song, B., Zaki, M.B.M.: Life-cycle assessment of flash pyrolysis of wood waste. J. Clean. Prod. 18, 1177–1183 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tremeac, B., Meunier, F.: Life cycle analysis of 4.5 MW and 250 W wind turbines. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13, 2104–2110 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Guezuraga, B., Zauner, R., Polz, W.: Life cycle assessment of two different 2 MW class wind turbines. Renew. Energy 37, 37–44 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Maraver, D., Sin, A., Sebastian, F., Royo, J.: Environmental assessment of CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) systems based on biomass combustion in comparison to conventional generation. Energy 57, 17–23 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    HOMER. HOMER Energy LLC. http://www.homerenergy.com (2016)
  46. 46.
    Dalton, G., Lockington, D., Baldock, T.: Feasibility analysis of renewable energy supply options for a grid-connected large hotel. Renew. Energy 34, 955–964 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Askari, B., Ameri, M.: Techno-economic feasibility analysis of stand-alone renewable energy systems (PV/bat, Wind/bat and Hybrid PV/wind/bat) in Kerman, Iran. Energy Sour. 7, 45–60 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Beccali, M., Brunone, S., Cellura, M., Franzitta, V.: Energy, economic and environmental analysis on RET-hydrogen systems in residential buildings. Renew. Energy 33, 366–382 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Raslter, D., Akhil, A., Gauntlett, D., Cutter, E.: Energy storage system cost 2011 update executive summary. Electric Power Research Institute, Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, California (2011)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    TCG. Technical Chamber of Greece, 1 March 2010 (Online). http://portal.tee.gr/portal/page/portal/tptee/totee/TOTEE-20701-3-Diefkiniseis-3-2011-Final.pdf. Accessed 7 Dec 2016
  51. 51.
    Spath, P.L., Mann, M.K.: Life Cycle Assessment of a Natural Gas Combined-Cycle Power Generation System. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Colorado (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Jungbluth, N., Stucki, M., Flury, K.: Life Cycle Inventories of Photovoltaics. ESU-services Ltd, Uster (2012)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Jungbluth, N., Bauer, C., Donesand, R., Frischknecht, R.: Life cycle assessment for emerging technologies: case studies for photovoltaic and wind power. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 10, 24–34 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mohammad Rozali, N.E., Wan Alwi, S.R., Abdul Manan, Z., Klemes, J.J., Hassan, M.Y.: Process integration of hybrid power systems with energy losses considerations. Energy 55, 38–45 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Production Engineering and ManagementTechnical University of CreteChaniaGreece

Personalised recommendations