Advertisement

Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals

, Volume 70, Issue 10, pp 2547–2553 | Cite as

Analysis and Simulation of Parallel Tubular Channel Angular Pressing of Al 5083 Tube

Technical Paper

Abstract

Severe plastic deformation (SPD) is divided to a number of branches. One of the most important branches of SPD of tube materials is parallel tubular channel angular pressing (PTCAP). The PTCAP process is more complicated than another SPD process for metal tubes. The PTCAP process includes two half cycles for obtaining the desired product. There are some factors, which affect the PTCAP process. For instance, deformation ratio, clamping force, channel angles, and curvature angles. In this paper, the PTCAP process for aluminum alloy (Al 5083) was simulated through the finite element ABAQUS software in order to investigate the effect of die parameters. Thus, the influences of deformation ratio, channel angles, and curvature angles on the PTCAP process were examined numerically. In addition, to verify the finite element method (FEM) results, the PTCAP process was done experimentally. To some extent, good conformity was observed between the FEM calculations and experimental results.

Keywords

Simulation Severe plastic deformation Tube Design Experiment 

References

  1. 1.
    Yoon S C, Horita Z, and Kim H S, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 201 (2008) 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abrinia K, and Mirnia M, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 46 (2010) 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee S, Saito Y, Tsuji N, Utsunomiya H, and Sakai T, Scr. Mater. 46 (2002) 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Faraji G, Mashhadi M M, and Kim H S, Mater. Lett. 65 (2011) 3009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Faraji G, Mashhadi M, Abrinia K, and Kim H, Appl. Phys. A 107 (2012) 819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Faraji G, Mosavi M M, and Seop K H, Mater. Trans. 53 (2012) 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Segal V M, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 197 (1995) 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Richert J, Richert M, Zasadziński J, and Korbel A, Patent PL (1979), no. 123026.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zu-de Z, Qiang C, Yan-bin W, and Da-yu S, Trans. Nonferrous Metals Soc. China 19 (2009) 535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhu Y T, Jiang H, Huang J, and Lowe T C, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 32 (2001) 1559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Faraji G, Mashhadi M, Dizadji A, and Hamdi M, J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 26 (2012) 3463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Faraji G, Babaei A, Mashhadi M M, and Abrinia K, Mater. Lett. 77 (2012) 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Faraji G, Bushroa A, Babaei A, Mashhadi M, and Hamdi M, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 563 (2013) 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nagasekhar A V, Yoon S C, TickHon Y, and Kim H S, Comput. Mater. Sci. 46 (2009) 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xu C, Furukawa M, Horita Z, and Langdon T G, Acta Mater. 51 (2003) 6139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Torabzadeh H, Faraji G, and Zalnezhad E, Trans. Indian Inst. Metals 69 (2016) 1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Afrasiab M, Faraji G, Tavakkoli V, Mashhadi M M, and Dehghani K, Trans. Indian Inst. Metals 68 (2015) 873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Metals Test Methods and Analytical Procedures, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM-E8 and ASTM-E517, West Conshohocken, PA Vol 03.01, 2000.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Indian Institute of Metals - IIM 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringIran University of Science and TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations