Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals

, Volume 70, Issue 10, pp 2575–2589 | Cite as

Modelling Corrosion Behavior of Friction Stir Processed Aluminium Alloy 5083 Using Polynomial: Radial Basis Function

Technical Paper


Aluminium alloy 5083, widely used in marine applications, undergoes accelerated corrosion in sea water due to the aggressive reaction of chloride ions with the secondary phase particles and other intermetallics present in the alloy matrix. The corrosion rate of the alloy is also influenced by the temperature difference between the alloy and its environment. Friction stir processing (FSP) is a recent solid state processing technique for improving the surface properties of metals and alloys. In this study, an attempt has been made to explore the possibility of improving the corrosion resistance of AA5083 by FSP. FSP trials were performed by varying the tool rotation speed, tool traverse speed and shoulder diameter of the tool, as per face centered central composite design. The corrosion potential and the corrosion rate of friction stir processed AA5083 was studied using potentiodynamic polarization studies, at three different temperatures. Mathematical models based on polynomial—radial basis function were developed and used to study the effect of process parameters on the corrosion potential and the corrosion rate of friction stir processed AA5083. FSP resulted in refinement of the grain structure, dispersion and partial dissolution of secondary phase particles in the matrix, which increased the corrosion resistance of the alloy.


Aluminium alloy Corrosion Friction stir processing Design of experiments Radial basis function 


  1. 1.
    Bailey J C, Porter F C, Pearson A W, and Jarman R A, 4.1 - Aluminium and Aluminium Alloys, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (1994).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jafarzadeh K, Shahrabi T, Hadavi S M M, and Hosseini M G, Anti-Corros Methods Mater 56 (2009) 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mishra R S, Ma Z, and Charit I, Mater Sci Eng A 341 (2003) 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mishra R S, and Ma Z, Mater Sci Eng R 50 (2005) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cui G, Ma Z, and Li S, Acta Mater 57 (2009) 5718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ma Z, Metall Mater Trans A 39 (2008) 642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Padmanaban R, V Ratna Kishore, and Balusamy V, Procedia Eng 97 (2014) 854. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Padmanaban R, Balusamy V, and Nouranga K N, J Eng Sci Tech 10 (2015) 790.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vaira Vignesh R, Padmanaban R, Arivarasu M, Karthick K, Sundar A A, Gokulachandran J, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing (2016), p 012136.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vignesh R V, Padmanaban R, Arivarasu M, Karthick K P, Sundar A A, and Gokulachandran J, in International Conference on Advances in Materials and Manufacturing Applications, Bengaluru IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 149 (2016).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smolej A, Klobčar D, Skaza B, Nagode A, Slaček E, Dragojević V, and Smolej S, Mater Sci Eng A 590 (2014) 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fuller C B, and Mahoney M W, Metall Mater Trans A 37 (2006) 3605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Santos T G, Lopes N, Machado M, Vilaça P, and Miranda R M, J Mater Process Technol 216 (2015) 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sharma V, Gupta Y, Kumar B V M, and Prakash U, Mater Manuf Process 31 (2016) 1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yuvaraj N, Aravindan S, Vipin, J Mater Res Technol 4 (2015) 398. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2015.02.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johannes L B, Charit I, Mishra R S, and Verma R, Mater Sci Eng A 464 (2007) 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hayashi J T, Menon S K, Su J Q, and McNelley T R, Key Eng Mater 443 (2010) 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tan L, and Allen T R, Corros Sci 52 (2010) 548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rahimi H, Mozaffarinia R, Hojjati Najafabadi A, J Mater Sci Technol 29 (2013) 603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mars G F, Corrosion Engineering, Mc Graw-Hill Book Company, New York (2010).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Davis J R, Corrosion of Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys, A S M International, United States of America (1999).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mishra R S, De P S, and Kumar N, Fundamental Physical Metallurgy Background for FSW/P, Springer International Publishing, Cham (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vaira Vignesh R, Padmanaban R, Arivarasu M, Thirumalini S, Gokulachandran J, Ram M S S S, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing (2016), p 012208.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Indian Institute of Metals - IIM 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amrita School of EngineeringAmrita Vishwa Viduyapeetham, Amrita UniversityCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations