Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Continuous and Pulsed Current GTA Welding on the Performance of Dissimilar Welds Involving Aerospace Grade Alloys

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dissimilar joints involving Inconel 718 and the martensitic grade stainless steel AISI 416 have been employed in gas turbine applications. In the present study, an attempt has been made to compare the effect of continuous current and pulsed current gas tungsten arc welding of this dissimilar joint. These dissimilar alloys were welded using a low cost, Nb free stainless steel filler, with a view of controlling or eliminating the deleterious Laves phase. Microstructure studies performed at the fusion zones of both CCGTA and PCGTA weldments revealed the formation of martensite at the cap zones. The unmixed zone containing Nb rich phases, observed at the weld interface of Inconel 718 was found to be lower for PCGTA weldments. Tensile failures were experienced at the parent metal of AISI 416 for both the cases. Impact toughness of the weldments were lower than that of parent metals employed in the study. High temperature corrosion studies were performed on the weld coupons by exposing them to an aggressive molten salt environment containing K2SO4 − 60% NaCl at 650 °C. Owing to the recrystallization and grain refinement, the PCGTA weldments experienced better corrosion resistance compared to the CCGTA weldments. Surface analytical techniques were employed to determine the hot corroded species formed and attempts have been made to establish the corrosion kinetics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sun Z, and Karppi R, J Mater Process Technol 59 (1996) 257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McLean M, Webster G A, Nabarro F R, and Cottrell A, Philos Trans R Soc Lond 351 (1995) 419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mortensen K S, Jensen C G, Conrad L C, and Losee F, Weld Res Suppl 1 (2001) 268.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ram G J, Reddy A V, Rao K P, and Reddy G M, Sci Technol Weld Join 9 (2013) 390.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ramkumar K D, Patel S D, Praveen S S, Choudhury D J, Prabaharan P, Arivazhagan N, and Xavior M A, Mater Des 62 (2014) 175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Manikandan S G, Sivakumar D, Rao K P, and Kamaraj M, J Mater Process Technol 214 (2014) 358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eliaz N, Shemesh G, and Latanision R M, Eng Fail Anal 9 (2002) 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rapp R A, Corros Sci 44 (2002) 209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mahobia G S, Paulose N, and Singh V, J Mater Eng Perform 22 (2013) 2418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu E, Zheng Z, Guan X, Tong J, Ning L, and Yu Y, J Mater Sci Technol 26 (2010) 895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramkumar K D, Dev S, Saxena V, Choudhary A, Arivazhagan N, and Narayanan S, Mater Des 87 (2015) 663.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lundin C D, Liu W, Zhou G, and Qiao C Y, Weld Res Counc Bull 428 (1998) 98.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bilmes P D, Solari M, and Llorente C L, Mater Charact 46 (2001) 285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Davis J R, Stainless Steel-ASM Specialty Handbook, ASM International, New York (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lancaster J F, Metallurgy of Welding. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge (1999).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. John L, and Damian J K, Welding Metallurgy and Weldability of Stainless Steels, Wiley, Hoboken (2005) p 61.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Iamboliev T, Weld Mater Test 4 (2015) 3.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Raman R S, Metall Mater Trans A 29 (1998) 577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Arivazhagan N, Singh S, Prakash S, and Reddy G M, Corros Eng Sci Technol 44 (2009) 369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hiramatsu N, Uematsu Y, Tanaka T, Kinugasa M, Mater Sci Eng A 120 (1989) 319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank the Aeronautical Research & Development Board (AR&DB) [ARDB/01/2031754/M/I] for funding the project. The funding provided by DST-FIST for Instron Universal Testing Machine at our VIT University is gratefully acknowledged. The authors sincerely thank Mr. Arul Maximus Rabel, Scientist, Sathyabama University and Mr. G. Selvakumar, Assistant Professor (Research), PSG Center for Excellence for Industrial and Home Textiles for helping us in the SEM/EDAX analysis. The authors wish to thank Mr. Aditya Chandrasekhar for proof reading the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sidharth Dev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dev, S., Ramkumar, K.D., Arivazhagan, N. et al. Effect of Continuous and Pulsed Current GTA Welding on the Performance of Dissimilar Welds Involving Aerospace Grade Alloys. Trans Indian Inst Met 70, 729–739 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-017-1085-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-017-1085-y

Keywords

Navigation