Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals

, Volume 70, Issue 5, pp 1285–1294 | Cite as

Effect of Short Glass Fiber Loading on the Mechanical Behaviour of PA66/PTFE Blend Composites

Technical Paper


The polymer blend of Polyamide66 and Polytetrafluroethylene (PA66/PTFE) (80/20 wt.%) were selected for the study. These blends were reinforced with 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 wt.% of silane treated short glass fibers (SGF) and were prepared by using melt mixing method with the help of twin screw extruder. The mechanical properties such as tensile strength, flexural strength, impact strength were studied in addition to hardness of the blend composites as per ASTM. The results revealed that the addition of SGF into PA66/PTFE blend greatly enhanced the mechanical properties of the polymer blend. The tensile strength and the flexural strength of the blend was almost double than that of the neat blend after reinforcing 30 wt.% of SGF. The addition of SGF into the blend greatly improved the flexural modulus and also the hardness of the blend. The impact strength of the blend decreased initially and then increased after the SGF addition into the blend. The density of PA66/PTFE blend increased after SGF addition. The strain at break almost remained constant but deflection due to bending decreased with the addition of SGF into the studied polyblend. However, the effect of higher loading of SGF on the mechanical behavior of PA66/PTFE blend was greatly appreciable. The fractured surfaces of the specimens were examined by using Scanning Electron Microscope photographs (SEM).


Mechanical PA66/PTFE Short glass fibers Blends Flexure Hardness 


  1. 1.
    Pascoe M W, Tribology 6 (1973) 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Richardson G C, and Sauer J A, Polym Eng Sci 16 (1976) 252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Palabiyik M, and Bahadur S, Wear 253 (2002) 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yuqin T, and Junlong H, J Appl Mech Mater 182–183 (2012) 135.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen Z, Liu X, Lu R, and Li T, J Appl Polym Sci 105 (2007) 602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen Z, Liu X, Lu R, and Li T, J Appl Polym Sci 102 (2006) 523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gullu A, Ozdemir A, and Ozdemir E, Mater Des 27 (2006) 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jian Li, and Tao S, J Thermoplast Compos Mater 21 (2012) 1.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cao S, Liu H, Ge S, and Wu G, J Reinforced Plast Compos 30 (2011) 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumar M, Singh R K, Shekhar H, and Poomalai P, J Food Technol 1 (2013) 062.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fua S Y, Laukeb B, Maderb E, Yuea C Y, and Hua X, Composites 31 (2000) 117.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yuan Q, Bateman S A, Shen S, Gloria-Esparza C, and Xia K, J Thermoplast Compos Mater 26 (2011) 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hartikainen J, Hine P, Szabo J S, Linder M, Harmia T, Duckett R A, and Friedrich K, Compos Sci Technol 65 (2005) 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bijwe J, Sen S, and Ghosh A, Wear 258 (2005) 1536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Indian Institute of Metals - IIM 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringGovernment Engineering CollegeKrishnarajpeteIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringBangalore Institute of TechnologyBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations