Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals

, Volume 70, Issue 5, pp 1209–1214 | Cite as

Salt Bath Nitriding of Fe3Al Based Intermetallic Compound

Technical Paper
  • 183 Downloads

Abstract

Iron aluminide Fe3Al was produced in a vacuum arc melting furnace. The alloy was heat treated by salt bath nitriding at 580 °C for durations of 3, 6, and 9 h. The nitride layers formed on the surface were characterized with light optical microscopy (LOM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) equipped with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and micro hardness measurements. The results showed that the nitride layer thickness increased with an increase in nitriding duration, while the layer hardness did not vary. The nitride layers were composed chiefly of iron nitride and aluminum nitride phases. The dry sliding friction and wear behaviors of nitrided iron aluminides were determined. The results revealed that the wear resistance decreased with increase in the length of nitriding.

Keywords

Intermetallic compounds based on Fe3Al Nitriding Scanning electron microscopy X-ray mapping Wear 

References

  1. 1.
    Kim Y S, and Kim Y H, Mater Sci Eng A 258 (2010) 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cahn R W, International Symposium on Nickel and Iron Aluminides: Processing, Properties, and Applications, ASM International, Ohio (1997).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu C T, and Kumar K S, J Mater Sci (1993) 38.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guan X, Iwasaki K, Kishi K, Yamamoto R, and Tanaka M, Mater Sci Eng A 366 (2004) 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Celikyurek I, Torun O, and Baksan B, Mater Sci Eng A 528 (2011) 8530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Balasubramaniam R, J Alloy Compd 330-332 (2002) 506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Basu A, Majumdar J D, Alphonsa J, Mukherjee S, and Manna I, Mater Lett 62 (2008) 3117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yun-tao X, Dao-xin L, and Dong H, Appl Surf Sci 254 (2008) 5953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Skolek-Stefaniszyn E, Kaminski J, Sobczak J, and Wierzchon T, Vacuum 85 (2010) 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sirin S Y, Sirin K, and Kulac E, Mater Charact 59 (2008) 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Munoz Riofano R M, Casteletti L C, Canale L C F, and Totten G E, Wear 265 (2008) 57.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang J, Xiong J, Peng Q, Fan H, Wang Y, Li G, and Shen B, Mater Charact 60 (2009) 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Castro G, Fernandez-Vicente A, and Cid J, Wear 263 (2007) 1375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Terres M A, Ben Mohamed S, and Sidhom H. Int J Fatigue 32 (2010) 1795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wen D C, Appl Surf Sci 256 (2009) 797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Celikyurek I, Baksan B, Torun O, and Gurler R, Intermetallics 14 (2006) 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ekmekçiler E, Polat A, and Usta M, Surf Coat Technol 202 (2008) 6011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yu L G, Khor K A, and Sundararajan G, Surf Coat Technol 157 (2002) 226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ucisik A H, and Bindal C, Surf Coat Technol 91-95 (1997) 561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Indian Institute of Metals - IIM 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Metallurgical and Materials Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and ArchitectureEskişehir Osmangazi UniversityEskişehirTurkey

Personalised recommendations