Radioactive investigation of the impact the Kostomuksha Mining Enterprise on the radioecological state of adjacent areas, the Republic of Karelia, the Russian Federation

  • Georgy P. Kiselev
  • Evgeny Y. Yakovlev
  • Sergey V. Druzhinin
  • Sergey B. Zykov
  • Irina M. Kiseleva
  • Alexander V. Bagenov
Original Article
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

This article presents the results of radioecological studies on the territory of the Kostomuksha iron ore deposit (the Republic of Karelia, the Russian Federation, 64°38′55.0″N 30°44′58.1″E). Solution of the geoecological issues caused by the environmental pollution during the development, extraction, and enrichment of iron ore in large quantities has been shown by the example of the Kostomuksha Mining Enterprise, one of the largest in northwest Russia. The task solution was based on radioisotope methods. It has been determined that the concentration of naturally occurring radioactive isotopes is within the abundance percentage across the entire Kostomuksha Deposit. We found that some ore types have an increased potassium concentration. In the process of ore enrichment, radiopotassium migrates to the tailings dam of the Lake of Kostomuksha, resulting in pollution of the Kenti–Kento lake system with potassium-enriched sediments.

Keywords

Environmental radioactivity Kostomuksha iron ore deposit Man-caused impact Bottom sediments Natural radioactive elements Technogenic cesium-137 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by Russian Academy of Sciences (Grant No. 0409-2014-0132).

References

  1. AMPLITUDE (2016) Method for measuring the activity of radionuclides using a scintillation gamma spectrometer with the “Progress” software. Scientific and Technical Center “AMPLITUDE”, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  2. Atlasov PP (1993) Aerospace monitoring of geological environment in the mining and processing industries of Karelia (1990–1993). Aerogeology, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  3. Avdonin VV, Boytsov VE, Grigoriev VM (1998) Deposits of metallic minerals. Geoinformmark, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  4. Bronder L, Solokhina A, Verevkina E, Nikiforov V (2014) Report of the Bellona Association “Industrial pollution of territories of Russian part of the Barents region”. EOC Bellona, St. PetersburgGoogle Scholar
  5. Chalov PI (1991) Methodological guide to uranium-isotopic modeling of groundwater dynamics in conditions of active water exchange. Ilim, BishkekGoogle Scholar
  6. Fedorets NG (2001) Soil local monitoring in zone of action of the Kostomuksha Mining Enterprise. Proc KRC RAS 2:75–181Google Scholar
  7. Fedorets NG, Solodovnikov AN (2013) Influence of emissions of the Kostomuksha Mining Enterprise on forest litter of pine forests in the North taiga subarea of Karelia. Proc KRC RAS 6:143–152Google Scholar
  8. Fedorets NG, Bakhmet ON, Medvedeva MV (2015) Heavy metals in soils of Karelia. KRC RAS, PetrozavodskGoogle Scholar
  9. Gorkin AP (2006) Kostomuksha iron ore deposit. Geography. Rosmen, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  10. Gorkovets VY, Rayevskaya MB (1997) Geology of the Kostomuksha Nature Reserve. Finland Environment Institute, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  11. Gorkovets VY, Sharov NV (2015) Kostomuksha ore region (geology, deep structure and mineralogy). KSC RAS, PetrozavodskGoogle Scholar
  12. Gorkovets VY, Maksimovish LA, Rayevskaya MB (2011) Kostomuksha—is the largest complex ore province of the Republic of Karelia. KSC RAS, PetrozavodskGoogle Scholar
  13. Grzymko TJ, Marcantonio BA, McKee CM (2007) Temporal variability of uranium concentrations and 234U/238U activity ratios in the Mississippi River and its tributaries. Chem Geol 243:344–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kiselev GP (1999) Even isotopes of uranium in geosphere. UB RAS, EkaterinburgGoogle Scholar
  15. Kiselev GP, Druzhinin SV, Bazhenov AV, Zykova EN, Kiseleva IM (2015) Radiological research in the Kostomukshsky Nature Reserve. Proc Kostomukshsky State Nat Reserve 1:172–182Google Scholar
  16. Kolomytsev VA, Shiltsova GV (1998) Integrated environmental monitoring in Karelia (concept, program, methods, results 1992–1996). Forest Institute, PetrozavodskGoogle Scholar
  17. Konstantinov AK, Mashkovtsev GA, Miguta AK (2010) Uranium of Russian interior. VIMS, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  18. Krasilnikov PV (1995) Soil map of Karelia of medium scale: concept and methods. Ecol Geogr Soils Karelia 2:102–106Google Scholar
  19. Krutov VI (1997) Influence of gas-dust emissions the JSC “Karelsky Okatysh” on phytosanitary condition of pine forests. Probl For Phytopathol Mycol 1:41–43Google Scholar
  20. Lazareva NP, Kuchko AA, Kravchenko AB (1992) Influence of aerotechnogenic pollution on the state of pine forests of northern Karelia. KSC RAS, PetrozavodskGoogle Scholar
  21. Litinsky PY (1996) Assessment of forest degradation in the impact zone of Kostomuksha Mining Enterprise emissions by remote methods. KSC RAS, PetrozavodskGoogle Scholar
  22. Luo S, Ku T, Roback R (2000) In-situ radionuclide transport and preferential groundwater flows at INEEL (Idaho): decay-series disequilibrium studies. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 64(5):867–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maher K, DePaolo JC, Christensen JN (2006) U-Sr isotopic speedometer: fluid flow and chemical weathering rates in aquifers. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 70:4417–4435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Malov AI, Kiselev GP (2008) Uranium in underground waters of the Mezen syneclise. UB RAS, EkaterinburgGoogle Scholar
  25. Ministry of Nature Management and Ecology of the Karelia Republic (2015) State report on the environment of the Karelia Republic in 2014. Verso, PetrozavodskGoogle Scholar
  26. Novikov SG (2015) Heavy metals in the soils of Karelia. KSC RAS, PetrozavodskGoogle Scholar
  27. Novikov SG (2016) The content of heavy metals in soils of Kostomuksha city. Mod Probl Sci Educ 5:1–8Google Scholar
  28. Opekunova MG, Senkin OV (2001) Ecological monitoring of the Kostomukshsky Reserve and adjacent territories. SPBU, St. PetersburgGoogle Scholar
  29. Osmond JK, Rydell HS, Kaufman MI (1968) Uranium disequilibrium in groundwater: an isotope dilution approach in hydrologic investigations. Science 162:997–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Panteleeva YG (2006a) Assessment of environment state of Kostomuksha region of Karelia Republic on the basis of ecological and geochemical research. Notes Min Inst 1:26–28Google Scholar
  31. Panteleeva YG (2006b) Environmentally hazardous elements and minerals in raw materials, products and wastes of JSC Karelsky Okatysh and levels of accumulation of pollutants in environment. Geol Miner Geoecol North-West Russia 1:236–238Google Scholar
  32. Panteleeva YG (2007) Geochemical research of the influence of the iron-ore mining company “Karelsky Okatysh” on environment. Freib Forsch 516:68–72Google Scholar
  33. Panteleeva YG (2009a) Ecological and geochemical monitoring in the zone of action of the iron ore enterprise «Karelsky Okatysh». SPBU, St. PetersburgGoogle Scholar
  34. Panteleeva YG (2009b) Geochemical changes in environment in zone of influence of the JSC Karelsky Okatysh mining complex (Kostomuksha, Karelia Republic). PhD Thesis, St. Petersburg Mining University, St. PetersburgGoogle Scholar
  35. Perelman AI (1989) Geochemistry. High School, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  36. Potakhin SB (2007) Atlas of Karelian ASSR. PETRSU, PetrozavodskGoogle Scholar
  37. Riotte J, Chabaux F (1999) 234U/238U activity ratios in freshwaters as tracers of hydrological processes: the Strengbach Watershed (Vosges, France). Geochim Cosmochim Acta 63(9):1263–1275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Roback RC, Johnson TM, McLing TL (2001) Uranium isotopic evidence for groundwater chemical evolution and flow patterns in the Eastern Snake River plain aquifer, Idaho. Geol Soc Am Bull 9:1133–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. RSI (2016) RS-700 Mobile Radiation Monitoring System. Radiation Solutions Inc., Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  40. SanPiN 2.6.1.2523-09 (2009) Norms of radiation safety NRB-99/2009. MoscowGoogle Scholar
  41. Sapozhnikov YA, Aliev RA, Kalmykov SN (2006) Radioactivity of environment. Theory and practice, BINOM, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  42. Sharov NV (2014) Opening and exploration of the Kostomuksha iron ore deposit. PETRSU Publishing house, PetrozavodskGoogle Scholar
  43. Smyslov AA (1974) Uranium and thorium in the Earth’s crust. Nedra, LiningradGoogle Scholar
  44. Smyslov AA, Moiseenko UI, Chadovich TZ (1979) Thermal regime and radioactivity of the Earth. Nedra, LiningradGoogle Scholar
  45. Tikhonov AI (2009) Nonequilibrium uranium in conditions of active water exchange and its use in geology and hydrogeology. Naumov Publishing House, CheboksaryGoogle Scholar
  46. VIMS (2013) Method for measuring the volumetric activity of uranium isotopes (238U, 234U, 235U) in samples of natural (fresh and mineralized), process and waste water using alpha-spectrometric method with radiochemical preparation. VIMS, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  47. Yakovlev EY (2016) The use of isotope-radiogeochemical methods for diamond deposits prospecting in Arkhangelsk diamondiferous province. PhD Thesis, MGRI-RGGRU, MoscowGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georgy P. Kiselev
    • 1
  • Evgeny Y. Yakovlev
    • 1
  • Sergey V. Druzhinin
    • 1
  • Sergey B. Zykov
    • 1
  • Irina M. Kiseleva
    • 1
  • Alexander V. Bagenov
    • 1
  1. 1.N. Laverov Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research (FCIARctic), SevernoyArkhangelskRussia

Personalised recommendations