Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Seismic piezocone interpretation for shear wave velocity (V S) determination in the Persian Gulf

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shear wave velocity is one of the important factors representing the dynamic characteristics of soil layers. Hence, many researchers have focused their studies on determining shear wave velocity by direct field measurements or expressions developed by other soil parameters. The shear module and damping ratio of the soil layers also play a similar role in the majority of dynamic soil response analyses. Nevertheless, since they have to be measured in the laboratory by resonant column or cyclic triaxial tests on undisturbed samples, the possibility of preparing such samples and the reliability of the obtained results are of great concerns. In the present study, great effort has been made to determine the above dynamic factors by means of field data obtained from a versatile instrument, namely the seismic piezocone (SPCTU), and to derive expressions correlating them with some parameters obtainable by much simpler instruments. The reliability of laboratory measurements on undisturbed samples is also evaluated. The seismic piezocone test apparatus has been employed to evaluate the soil properties at 1-m depth intervals by means of measuring tip resistance, sleeve resistance, pore pressure and shear wave velocity. The shear module and the damping ratio are calculated using field data. Meanwhile, in order to assess the laboratory measurements of these parameters, some resonant column tests and cyclic triaxial tests on undisturbed samples of the same soil layers have been carried out. In order to compare the field results of shear modulus and damping ratios with those obtained from laboratory tests, the influences of the soil nature and sample disturbance on the conventional laboratory methods are evaluated and discussed. The shear wave velocity is correlated to overburden pressure and the corrected tip resistance for two groups of fine soils, namely silty clays and carbonate clayey silts, which mainly cover the areas under study in this project, are located in southern parts of Iran near the Persian Gulf. According to the results of the present study, there are narrow limits of shear modulus regarding soils for which the laboratory tests and the field measurements yield approximately the same shear modulus. This limit of shear modulus is about 30–50(MPa) for clay deposits and 70–100 (MPa) for sandy deposits. Also the shear wave velocity can be calculated by a simple expression from total overburden pressure and the tip resistance of simple cone penetration test results conventionally available in many soil explorations prior to engineering practices. However, if the pore pressure inside the saturated soil deposits can be measured by a piezocone apparatus, the shear wave velocity may be calculated using another suggested equation in terms of effective overburden pressure in the present study. Regarding the shear module and the damping ratio, due to the disturbances of the stiff deposits in the sampling process and great deviations of laboratory results from field results, the laboratory measurements of these parameters out of the above limits are not recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrus RD, Stokoe KH (2000) Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 126(11):1015–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D4373 (1984) Standard test method for calcium carbonate content of soils

  • ASTM D422 (1990) Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils

  • ASTM D3999 (1991) Standard test method for the determination of the modulus and damping properties of soils using the cyclic triaxial apparatus

  • ASTM D4015 (1992) Standard test method for modulus and damping of soils by the resonant-column method

  • ASTM D5778 (1995) Standard test method for performing electronic friction cone and piezocone penetration testing of soils

  • ASTM D2487 (1990) Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system)

  • Baldi G, Bellotti R, Ghionna V, Jamiolkowski M, Pasqualini E (1982) Design parameters for sand from CPT. In: Proceedings of 2nd European symposium on penetration testing, ESOPT II, vol 2. Balkema, Amsterdam, pp 425–432

  • Baldi G, Bellotti R, Ghionna V, Jamiolkowski M, Lo Presti DFC (1989) Modulus of sand from CPTs and DMTs. In: Proceedings of 12th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vol 1. Balkema, Rio de Janeiro, pp 165–170

  • Burns SE, Mayne PW (1999) Pore pressure dissipation behavior surrounding driven piles and cone penetrometers. Transportation research record, no. 1675. National Academy Press, Washington, pp 17–23

  • Burns SE, Mayne PW (2002a) Analytical cavity expansion-critical state model for Piezocone dissipation in fine-grained soils. Soil Found 42(2):131–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns SE, Mayne PW (2002b) Interpretation of seismic Piezocone results for the evaluation of hydraulic conductivity in clays. ASTM Geotech Test J 25(3):333–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Campanella RG (1994) Field methods for dynamic geotechnical testing. Dynamic geotechnical testing II (STP1213), ASTM, West Conshohochen, PA, pp 3–23

  • Campanella RG, Robertson PK, Gillespie D (1986) A seismic cone penetrometer for offshore application. In: Proceedings of oceanology international ‘86, international conference: advances in underwater technology, ocean science and offshore engineering, vol 6, chap 51. Brighton, UK

  • Crooks JHA, Been K, Becker DE, Jefferies MG (1988) CPT interpretation in clays. Penetration testing, vol 2 (ISOPT-1). Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 715–722

  • Gomberg J, Waldron B, Schweig E, Hwang H, Webbers A, VanArsdale R, Tucker K, Williams R, Street R, Mayne PW, Stephenson W, Odum J, Cramer C, Updike R, Hutson S, Bradley M (2003) Lithology and shear wave velocity in Memphis, Tennessee. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93(3):986–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajimohammadi A, Ghalandarzadeh A, Cheshomi A, Kazeminejad SM (2007) Determination of shear modulus (G0) of a calcareous soil by means of SCPTU and resonant columns tests. 4th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece

  • Hajimohammadi A, Cheshomi A, Habibi M, Mirhosseini M (2008) A comparison between soil shear modulus values using seismic cone and resonant column test in a calcareous soil (a case study). 3rd international soil characterization conference, Taiwan (China Taipei)

  • Hardin BO (1978) The nature of stress-strain behavior for soils. In: Proceedings, earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, vol 1. ASCE Conference, Pasadana, CA, pp 3–90

  • Ishihara K (1996) Soil behaviour in earthquake geotechnics. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jadi H, Luna R, Hoffman D, Mayne PW (2004) Site characterization of paleoliquefaction features in Missouri. Geotechnical and geophysical site characterization, vol 2 (Proceeding ISC-2, Porto). Millpress, Rotterdam, pp 1131–1138

  • Jamiolkowski M, Lancellotta R, LoPresti DCF, Pallara O (1994) Stiffness of Toyoura sand at small and intermediate strain. In: Proceedings of 13th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vol 1. New Delhi, pp 169–172

  • Kokusho T, Yoshida Y, Tanaka Y (1995) Shear wave velocity in gravelly soils with different particle grading. In: Evans MD, Fragaszy RJ (eds) Static and dynamic properties of gravelly soil. Geotechnical Spec. Publ. No. 56, ASCE, New York, pp 92–106

  • Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao T, Mayne PW (2005) Cone penetrometer measurements during Mississippi embayment seismic excitation experiment. In: Proceeding, geofrontiers, ASCE GSP, Austin, TX, 24–26 January 2005

  • Liao T, Mayne PW, Tuttle MP, Schweig ES, Van Arsdale RB (2002) CPT site characterization for seismic hazards in the new Madrid seismic zone. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22:943–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CP, Chang CJ, Lin JE (2002) The application of shear wave velocity to the liquefaction assessment in Central Taiwan. In: Proceeding of conference on the liquefaction potential of Central Taiwan

  • Lunne T, Robertson PK, Powell JJM (2002) Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice. Spon Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher A, Bennert T, Gucunski N (2002) Evaluation of geotechnical design parameters using the seismic Piezocone. Report no. FHWA 2001–032

  • Mayne PW (2000) Enhanced geotechnical site characterization by seismic piezocone penetration tests. Invited lecture, fourth international geotechnical conference, Cairo University, pp 95–120

  • Mayne PW (2004a) CPT-DMT interrelationships in piedmont residuum. Geotechnical and geophysical site characterization, vol 1 (Proceeding ISC-2, Porto). Millpress, Rotterdam, pp 345–350

  • Mayne PW (2004b) Lateral drilled shaft response from dilatometer tests. GeoSupport 2004, GSP No. 124, ASCE, Reston, VA, pp 415–428

  • Mayne PW, Poulos HG (1999) Approximate displacement influence factors for elastic shallow foundation systems. ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 125(6):453–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayne PW, Rix GJ (1993) Gmax − qc relationships for clays. Geotech Test J 16(1):54–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayne PW, Rix GJ (1995) Correlations between shear wave velocity and cone tip resistance in natural clays. Soils Found 35(2):107–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayne PW, Schneider JA (2001) Evaluating drilled shaft response by seismic cone. Foundation and ground improvement, GSP No. 113, ASCE, Reston, VA, pp 655–669

  • Mayne PW, Schneider JA, Martin GK (1999) Small- and high-strain soil properties from seismic flat dilatometer tests. Pre-failure deformation characteristics of geomaterials, vol 1. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 419–426

  • McGillivray A, Mayne PW (2004) Seismic Piezocone and seismic flat dilatometer tests at Treporti. Geotechnical & geophysical site characterization, vol 2 (Proceeding ISC-2, Porto). Millpress, Rotterdam, pp 1695–1700

  • McGillivray A, Casey T, Mayne PW, Schneider JA (2000) An electro-vibrocone for site-specific evaluation of soil liquefaction potential. Innovations & applications in geotechnical site characterization (GSP 97), ASCE, Reston, pp 106–117

  • Robertson PK (1998) An applications guide for the CPT. ConeTec Investigations Ltd, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PK, Sasitharan S, Cunning JC, Sego DC (1995) Shear-wave velocity to evaluate in-situ state of Ottawa sand. J Geotech Eng 121(3):262–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollins KM, Evans MD, Diehl NB, Daily WD (1998) Shear modulus and damping relationships for gravels. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 124(5):396–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider JA, Mayne PW (2000a) Ground improvement assessment using SCPTu and Crosshole data. Innovations & applications in geotechnical site characterization (GSP 97), ASCE, Reston, pp 169–180

  • Schneider JA, Mayne PW (2000b) Liquefaction response of soils in mid-America evaluated by seismic cone tests. Innovations & applications in geotechnical site characterization (GSP 97), ASCE, Reston, pp 1–16

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1970) Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic analysis. Report No. EERC 70-10, University of California, Berkeley

  • Tatsuoka F, Jardine RJ, LoPresti DCF, DiBenedetto H, Kodaka T (1997) Characterizing the pre-failure deformation properties of geomaterials. In: Proceedings, 14th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vol 4. Hamburg, p 35

  • Vucetic M, Dobry R (1991) Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. J Geotech Eng 117:89–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods RG (1994) Laboratory measurement of dynamic soil properties. Dynamic geotechnical testing II (STP1213). ASTM, West Conshohocken, pp 165–190

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda S, Yamaguchi I (1985) Dynamic shear modulus obtained in the laboratory and in situ. In: Proceedings of the symposium on evaluation of deformation and strength of sandy grounds. Japanese society of soil mechanics and foundation engineering, pp 115–118

  • Yokota K, Konno M (1985) Comparison of soil constants obtained from laboratory tests and in situ tests. In: Proceedings of the symposium on evaluation of deformation and strength of sandy grounds. Japanese society of soil mechanics and foundation engineering, pp 111–114

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to “SAHEL Consulting Engineers Institute” in sharing their compilations of case history data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

    Aliakbar Hajimohammadi & Seyed Majdeddin Mir Mohammad Hosseini

  2. Department of Geology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    Akbar Cheshomi

Authors
  1. Aliakbar Hajimohammadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seyed Majdeddin Mir Mohammad Hosseini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Akbar Cheshomi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Majdeddin Mir Mohammad Hosseini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hajimohammadi, A., Mir Mohammad Hosseini, S.M. & Cheshomi, A. Seismic piezocone interpretation for shear wave velocity (V S) determination in the Persian Gulf. Environ Earth Sci 61, 813–820 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0393-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0393-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation