Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A prospective study to evaluate the role of duodenal bulb biopsy in the diagnosis of celiac disease

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Celiac disease (CeD) requires a biopsy from the small intestine to confirm the diagnosis. Conventionally, duodenal bulb (D1) was avoided as a biopsy site due to histological confounding factors at this site. However, sometimes, the bulb mucosa is the only affected site. The aim of the present study was to assess changes in duodenal bulb histology and compare it to distal duodenal histology and to analyze whether the addition of duodenal bulb biopsy increases the diagnostic yield of the CeD.

Methods

It was a prospective study comprising of 98 patients of CeD who were symptomatic clinically and had positive anti tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody. Endoscopically four mucosal biopsies were taken, two each from the bulb and distal duodenum, and morphology was graded as per modified Marsh grade.

Results

Iron deficiency anemia (40%) was a most common clinical presentation followed by chronic diarrhea (30%). Sixty patients showed same Marsh grade and 38 showed different Marsh grade at both sites. Patients who were showing the difference in the Marsh grade at the two biopsy sites, in place of; descending duodenum showed higher grade in 24 patients while higher mucosal atrophy was documented in the bulb in 14 patients. No patient of CeD had isolated D1 involvement. In eight patients, the correct diagnosis of CeD could be made only because of bulb biopsy.

Conclusion

Majority of the patients had no classical symptoms. Different Marsh grade at the two biopsy sites was documented demonstrating the patchy distribution of CeD. Combining biopsy from both bulb and descending duodenum maximizes the diagnostic yield of the CeD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Green PHR, Cellier C. Celiac disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1731–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ludvigsson JF, Rubio-Tapia A, van Dyke CT, et al. Increasing incidence of celiac disease in a North American population. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:818–24.

  3. Mustalahti K, Catassi C, Reunanen A, et al. The prevalence of celiac disease in Europe: results of a centralized, international mass screening project. Ann Med. 2010;42:587–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sanders DS, Patel D, Stephenson TJ, et al. A primary care cross-sectional study of undiagnosed adult coeliac disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;15:407–13.

  5. Sood A, Midha V, Sood N, Avasthi G, Sehgal A. Prevalence of celiac disease among school children in Punjab, North India. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:1622–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhattacharya M, Dubey AP, Mathur NB. Prevalence of celiac disease in North Indian children. Indian Pediatr. 2009;46:415–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramakrishna BS, Makharia GK, Chetri K, Dutta S. Prevalence of adult celiac disease in India: regional variations and associations. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:115–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. West J, Fleming KM, Tata LJ, Card TR, Crooks CJ. Incidence and prevalence of celiac disease and dermatitis herpetiformis in the UK over two decades: population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:757–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hopper AD, Cross SS, Sanders DS. Patchy villous atrophy in adult patients with suspected gluten-sensitive enteropathy: is a multiple duodenal biopsy strategy appropriate? Endoscopy. 2008;40:219–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lundin KE, Sollid LM. Advances in coeliac disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2014;30:154–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gonzalez S, Gupta A, Cheng J, et al. Prospective study of the role of duodenal bulb biopsies in the diagnosis of celiac disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:758–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vogelsang H, Hanel S, Steiner B, et al. Diagnostic duodenal bulb biopsy in celiac disease. Endoscopy. 2001;33:336–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ravelli A, Bolognini S, Gambarotti M, Villanacci V. Variability of histologic lesions in relation to biopsy site in gluten-sensitive enteropathy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:177–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mooney PD, Kurien M, Evans KE, et al. Clinical and immunologic features of ultra-short celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:1125–34.

  15. Oberhuber G, Granditsch G, Vogelsang H. The histopathology of coeliac disease: time for a standardized report scheme for pathologists. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;11:1185–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Walia BNS, Sidhu JK, Tandon BN, Ghai OP, Bhargava S. Celiac disease in North Indian children. Br Med J. 1966;2:1233–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Misra RC, Kasthuri D, Chuttani HK. Adult coeliac disease in tropics. Br Med J. 1966;2:1230–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Farrell RJ, Kelly CP. Celiac disease and refractory celiac disease. In: Feldman M, Freidman LS, Brandt LJ. Ed. Sleisenger and Fordtran’s Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease, Philadelphia, Saunders Elsevier, 2010; pp1797–820. 9th Edition.

  19. Mohindra S, Yachha SK, Srivastava A, et al. Coeliac disease in Indian children: assessment of clinical, nutritional and pathologic characteristics. J Health Popul Nutr. 2001;19:204–8.

  20. Poddar U, Thapa BR, Nain CK, Prasad A, Singh K. Celiac disease in India: are they true cases of celiac disease? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2002;35:508–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Poddar U, Thapa BR, Singh K. Clinical features of celiac disease in Indian children: are they different from west? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006;43:313–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhattacharya M, Kapoor S, Dubey AP. Celiac disease presentation in a tertiary referral centre in India. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2013;32:98–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Makharia GK, Baba CS, Khadgawat R, Lal S. Celiac disease: variations of presentations in adults. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2007;26:162–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tapia AR, Hill ID, Kelly CP, Calderwood AH, Murray JA. ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:656–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Achkar E, Carey WD, Petras R, et al. Comparison of suction capsule and endoscopic biopsy of small bowel mucosa. Gastrointest Endosc. 1986;32:278–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gottrand F, Turck D, Mitchell V, et al. Comparison of fiberendoscopy and Watson capsule for small intestinal biopsy in infants and children. Acta Paediatr. 1992;81:399–401.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mangiavillano B, Masci E, Parma B, et al. Bulb biopsy for the diagnosis of celiac disease in paediatric patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:564–8.

  28. Levinson-Castiel R, Hartman C, Morgenstern S, et al. Role of duodenal bulb biopsy in the diagnosis of celiac disease in children. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45:26–9.

  29. Bonamico M, Thanasi E, Mariani P,et al. Duodenal bulb biopsies in celiac disease: a multicenter study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008;47:618–22.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, Sawai Man Singh Medical College, J L N Marg, Jaipur, 302 004, India

    Bhanwar Singh Dhandhu, Gaurav Kumar Gupta, Shashank J. Wanjari & Sandeep Nijhawan

  2. Department of Pathology, Sawai Man Singh Medical College, J L N Marg, Jaipur, 302 004, India

    Nidhi Sharma

Authors
  1. Bhanwar Singh Dhandhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gaurav Kumar Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shashank J. Wanjari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nidhi Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sandeep Nijhawan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandeep Nijhawan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

BSD, GKG, SJW, NS, and SN declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics statement

The authors declare that the study was performed in a manner conforming to the Helsinki declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 and 2008 concerning human and animal rights, and the authors followed the policy concerning informed consent as shown on Springer.com.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dhandhu, B.S., Gupta, G.K., Wanjari, S.J. et al. A prospective study to evaluate the role of duodenal bulb biopsy in the diagnosis of celiac disease. Indian J Gastroenterol 37, 98–102 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-018-0821-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-018-0821-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation